You're right Mr. Jonny, Russo is the only account, credible or not...if anyone finds anymore evidence please let us know. Let's get Nick on CNN
So you have basically no reason to leap to any conclusions based on what he said at all. So why don't you provide:
1) Evidence Nick Rockefeller said
any of what Aaron Russo claims he did, not counting Aaron Russo
claiming he said those things without evidence.
2) Evidence the Rockefellers are an "Illuminati family"
Go on, you must have
something. Documents. Letters. Testimony by disgruntled insiders. Some kind of hard evidence. If not, why are you talking about the Rockefellers being an "Illuminati family?"
I see reasons to suspect Russo may not be the best, least biased source right off. I can see how the image of the tyrannical Rockefellers plays very well into his anti-Federal Reserve, taxation-is-illegal worldview. His views on these matters seem to prevent him from seeing the situation as anything
but a deep-
seated conspiracy.
Consider this, israelside:
The world is not ruled by evil masters bent on domination of the "sheeple." In fact, the world is not really ruled by anyone. Governments are held together by fragile, corruptable social contracts that can and do crumble into dust for the smallest of reasons.
Our economic system is built on the unsteady foundation of mutual consent. The market, through all its technical complexity, is simply a product of the people that make it up and their mutual wants and needs. It can be modelled and studied, but tends to resist attempts at controlling it in the most confounding ways.
Currency is worth nothing. Gold is worth nothing.
Nothing is worth
anything but what another person is willing to pay for it. There are no grand societies that rule through time and space, only groups of men and women trying to hold onto their fragile wealth in a changing, dangerous world.
The real world is one where a group of religious fanatics with sufficient resources and a few lucky breaks can snuff our a few thousand lives forever. The real world is one where a rogue leader could wield the power to wipe an entire city from the face of the Earth.
To say that 9/11 was caused by this evil cabal, or that the Illuminati manipulate history is to say "at least
someone was in control!" All we need to do is remove them from power, then life will be fine.
Too bad that's not reality. The reality is that there will probably
always be those who are willing to destroy others because of their fanatical beliefs. There is no global elite to fight against, no corporate masters that can be toppled to magically fix the world. There is only the true believer, waiting in the dark, sharpening his box-cutter, looking for an opportunity to strike against something he hates.
To say that 9/11 was
not an inside job requires a measure courage. It requires that one admit that the world is chaotic, and sometime ◊◊◊◊ happens for no good reason. The "they" of the conspiracy theorist is a nice, warm, safe blanket against the real world. "They" might be horrible, but least "they" are predictable, and can be readily fought against.
Too bad it's not like that in the real world.
You don't even know my position on things...strawman! I am not saying Rockefeller's statement are CT driven because 911 was an inside job. I'm saying if he had motivations behind 911 (or other big wigs) then it would prove the theory, but don't be saying that you blindly collect evidence and base your opinion based on that evidence without atleast theorizing first...we all do and so do great scientists! Evolution is a theory and people look at apes to try and prove it...or creationists try to point out God's hand in the world to prove their theory...that is not a fallacy, it is proving your theory (based no little evidence) by collecting more evidence! But we should not be blind to contrary evidence either (contrary to our theory)!
