When you prove that the truth movement uses "Pseudo Science" to support it's arguments, I'll look into this.
The thread was started to link to an article about pseudoscience from quackwatch. How does Lord Tsukasa react?
When you prove that the truth movement uses "Pseudo Science" to support it's arguments, I'll look into this.
I wasn't that off. I already knew the excuses somewhat and I still don't buy them though. It's based off my personal incredulity so don't bother too much with it.
So far, they're ridiculously wrong and jumping to unfounded conclusions and the movie isn't even out.
if its at LCF screenshots are preferred, stuff gets disappeared a lot over therenicepants:
You're new, so I'll give you a grace period.
You have to post a link to that quote, or a screenshot though, or else it can't be considered for the finals.
M7
Atta was a crazed, cocained-up, drug-smuggling, terrorist/hijacker. Maybe even a federal agent.

Dylan Avery @ LCF said:Everything in the Final Cut will be factual. No speculation, no wild conclusions.
We've learned alot, I've learned alot and grown up since April 2005.
The Residue Vid is nothing more than a tour of the hangar they keep (kept?) the WTC ruins at. The other 2 are about as boring as gumboot makin' WAFFLES!! /Shreck Quote
I'm not sure if this quote belongs in the "Stundies"...but it certainly made me gasp and giggle.
Raise your hand if you think this quote will come back to haunt Mr. Avery.
Screen Cap:
Only the 720's final flight – the crash flight – was unmanned. While takeoffs, landings, and approaches were done under remote control, the flights had pilots ready to take over the controls in case of problems. And in fact in the final test the remote pilot was unable to properly control the plane.Hey, remember that time Screw Loose Change made a huge post about how I say the Boeing 720 made 10 take-offs and 13 landings? And remember when I proved them wrong by pointing out the simple fact that they were un-manned? Something which would have taken two minutes of research?
But hey, JamesB is ALWAYS right, according to himself.
Does it surprise anyone that Avery can only find a single, completely inconsequential issue to rub in his critics' faces, and he can't quite get that right either?During the preparations for the crash flight at Dryden, 14 flights of the Boeing 720 aircraft with crews were flown, with Dryden providing superlative efforts to develop the remote piloting techniques necessary for the 720 to fly as a drone aircraft. The 14 flights had 9 takeoffs, 13 landings, and approximately 69 approaches to about 150 ft above the prepared crash site under remote control.
http://oea.larc.nasa.gov/PAIS/Concept2Reality/crashworthiness.html
Dylan Avery @ LCF, referring to members of the SLC forum who made criticisms of material that will be in LCFC.
The quote describes Dylan perfectly, he just needs to replace "they're" with "I'm".
Forgot the link (Thanks Mobyseven)
[qimg]http://www.husseh.com/911/images/dyl1.png[/qimg]
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8351&st=450&#lastAvenger @ LCF:
The North Tower spire dropped straight down, instead of toppling. Have you ever seen a tree just sink into the Earth like that? Solid bedrock does not just suddenly turn into thin air.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8351&st=450&#last
It's enough to make you weep.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8351&st=450&#last
It's enough to make you weep.
Bedrock can not vanish into thin air. So how does the spire come straight down? When a tree falls, does it come straight down or does it topple? It's a very simple question.
Sheesh! What is it with twoofers and trees?