All 9/11 ideas welcomed here

israelside said:
Well the building was next to wtc 7, alot of aspestos or whatnot probably got in it and it was hit on the corner and likely it was hit in other places that left it vulnerable. Where does it say how much of a direct impact it took from the wtc 7 collapse itself and not just debris from the towers? You got that handy?
Click to expand...
You're being pretty demanding for someone who uses the term "aspestos and whatnot." Do a little research first, before you dispute a claim. You'll find "aspestos" listed under asbestos.
 
black op's are real and A-Q's involvement in world affairs could be one, We are at war with nothing. Nick Rockefeller said the war on terrorism is a hoax, I will believe him over you anyday!
 
gumboot said:
:hb:

There's a four lane road between WTC7 and 30 West Broadway. As I have told you repeatedly. Answer me honestly, do you ever read any of the replies people provide you with?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

ok, I do read all the replies, but no one replies to me. I keep saying that I want to see a video of the building falling over to 1 side (30 w broadway), but it is entirely plausible for the building to have been a CD, brought straight down, and then the building layed over a tad towards 30 w broad....this was a 47 story building remember, the biggest chunk of siding i see in broadway is 10-15 stories tall and most of it looks twisted up as if it fell in on itself lol....are you blind? What portion of the building leaned? What was the highest portion that leaned? Where is it located? But even this isn't good enough because once the material fell onto itself no telling where it could have slid off to! I hope this is clear...
 
israelside said:
black op's are real and A-Q's involvement in world affairs could be one, We are at war with nothing. Nick Rockefeller said the war on terrorism is a hoax, I will believe him over you anyday!
Click to expand...

Do yourself a favor, get off the net, go to a book shop or a library and go to the section marked history. Find a book, a well written, well researched book on the war in Afghanistan. Please read it.

All your questions will be answered in it. If you cannot find a book shop or library or even a book on the subject I will gladly recommend a few that can be bought on line.

Stop trying to gain knowledge off conspiracy web sites, read an independent history book and grow up.
 
israelside said:
ok, I do read all the replies, but no one replies to me. I keep saying that I want to see a video of the building falling over to 1 side (30 w broadway), but it is entirely plausible for the building to have been a CD, brought straight down, and then the building layed over a tad towards 30 w broad....this was a 47 story building remember, the biggest chunk of siding i see in broadway is 10-15 stories tall and most of it looks twisted up as if it fell in on itself lol....are you blind? What portion of the building leaned? What was the highest portion that leaned? Where is it located? But even this isn't good enough because once the material fell onto itself no telling where it could have slid off to! I hope this is clear...
Click to expand...


What's clear is you have no interest whatsoever in uncovering truth, but only in reinforcing your blind convictions, which you cling to like a limpet.

Read this entire PDF, all 18 pages.

It is a professional assessment from the best Demolition experts in the entire United States. They categorically state that an explosive demolition of WTC7 under the conditions found at Ground Zero on 9/11 was impossible.

-Gumboot
 
gumboot said:
You might want to refrain from personal attacks.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

I think it was in reference to my avatar actually( That is not a picture of me israelside ). I take you will not be taking my advice and reading a book then israelside?

Oh well best of luck in your future life of lies and distortions, continually trying to make it all fit together. Oh but those pesky facts just get in the way all the time.
 
I think we're dealing with a direct offspring of this guy.....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_von_Sacher-Masoch

Israelside, you're like one of those inflatable clowns with the sand in the bottom that no matter how many times you hit them, they bounce back up into position so you can boink 'em on the nose again. I have to give a gruding admiration to someone who can keep coming back and totally ignore the fact that he's getting the living crap beat out of himself, and yet offer nothing in the way of counter-argument in six pages, other than a lot of "I know you are but what am I".

I'm curious as to just where you take this back to like our other twoofer buddies to claim victory? You're getting your butt handed to you, son. The only thing I can think is you go back to some S&M site and giggle 'cuz you got everyone to stomp all over you. (Mods: Metaphor Alert! Metaphor Alert! Poetic License! I'm not actually making accusations, here!)

I can really see no other explanation for your behaviour.

You need to take a break, get some rest, organize your thoughts into a coherent whole (or several coherent parts) and decide just what it is you're debating. Thus far, you're like a runaway train crossed with a loose cannon on deck and a bull in a chinashop.
 
stateofgrace said:
I think it was in reference to my avatar actually( That is not a picture of me israelside ). I take you will not be taking my advice and reading a book then israelside?

Oh well best of luck in your future life of lies and distortions, continually trying to make it all fit together. Oh but those pesky facts just get in the way all the time.
Click to expand...

Israelside,
Don't you believe him, son! That's really stateofgrace! I know, 'cuz David Griffin checked with our Sumerian Overlords and they confirmed it.
 
israelside said:
I have read history books and all sorts of books, maybe more than you, but from your replies we can tell you ignore alot of the issues I have talked about inturn for your rude attacks on my maturity...listen foolish glasses wearing dumb looking dog person, the only person that is immature is the one who is stupid on the issues and speaks as if they know alot about it, I ask more questions than I give...but the things i DO know, I DO speak...unlike youself!
Click to expand...

So, you KNOW that WTC7 was a CD? How did they do it? How much time did it take to wire? Where were the signs of explosives? How much talller was WTC7 than the world record CD? How did they get to the structural columns to plant the explosives?
 
israelside said:
I have read history books and all sorts of books, maybe more than you, but from your replies we can tell you ignore alot of the issues I have talked about inturn for your rude attacks on my maturity...listen foolish glasses wearing dumb looking dog person, the only person that is immature is the one who is stupid on the issues and speaks as if they know alot about it, I ask more questions than I give...but the things i DO know, I DO speak...unlike youself!
Click to expand...

Spoken with the rock-solid, unshakable conviction that only a true ideologue could have.
 
israelside said:
black op's are real and A-Q's involvement in world affairs could be one, We are at war with nothing. Nick Rockefeller said the war on terrorism is a hoax, I will believe him over you anyday!
Click to expand...

Good morning israelside. I'm curious, what do you find compelling about Nicholas Rockefeller's claims? Also, why do you believe him to be a credible source?
 
israelside said:
wtc 7, from video evidence (4 angles that I know of) show the building falling in a pretty much straight down fashion
Click to expand...

Then you admit it wasn't straight down ?

, some of the siding could have struct nearby buildings, but at no measure can anyone say it was a total lopsided collapse, because the bulk of the rubble is on top of itself (in it's own footprint).
Click to expand...

The bulk, yes, like most collapses, controlled or otherwise.

I am no expert, but I have eyes and sense of a smart person, to some degree atleast!
Click to expand...

That is irrelevant. The fact that you have no knowledge of how these things work leads you to believe things based on your ignorance. That can't ever be good.

there was alot of general threats, but how much do we not know of that is classified, that's the thing...we hear about the broad range issues, no details for the public remember...taking that into account what did the agencies know prior 911? No one really knows, not even you gumboot...heaven forbid!
Click to expand...

Ignorance is not evidence.

The terrorists are the global elite, the ones who pull the strings in this world, the ones who did 911...that's who is to blame,
Click to expand...

You have no evidence, only speculation. Tell me, when you see a doctor, do you want to be treated on a hunch ? Me neither.

and I will always believe that!
Click to expand...

Are you saying that no amount of reality will dislodge your fantasy ? That is a dangerous mode of thinking.

more evidence, conclusive evidence, unbiased 100% proof!!!!...
Click to expand...

That is unreasonable, because it is so vague you could always claim not to have it, no matter what. What, precisely, would convince you ?

black op's are real
Click to expand...

Ham sandwitches are real, too; but it doesn't mean I'm eating one right now.

Nick Rockefeller said the war on terrorism is a hoax, I will believe him over you anyday!
Click to expand...

Again, how does this relate to 9/11 ?
 
Israelside,

Just a hint. Drop the constant use of exclamation marks dude.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom