Totovader
Game Warden
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2007
- Messages
- 3,321
It's was not for a wind effecttest , but for an impact test.
My point is really simple, but believers(the people who always insult peeps who don't believe what they believe) can't understand it.
NIST model is theory, speculation based on simulation and "law of physics" not fact or proof.
And powder and little rocks don't bring down building.
People can't understand it because you continue to contradict yourself. It's difficult to take people seriously and follow their train of thought when they contradict themselves. I believe, therefore, that the lack of understanding is solely your fault.
Theory and speculation are two completely different things- and if you are trying to claim that the application of the laws of physics are not fact or proof, then you are miles away from having a valid point.
Powder and little rocks didn't bring down the building- that is a strawman. The "powder and little rocks" are a result of the building being brought down.