LC Final Insult Teaser !110001!!1

Haha, I bet it'll have none of their ''evidence'' so that we can't get to work on it already :D
 
Will this teaser include Do Over riding ATVs and watching his plasma TV?

What's that you say? It's not that kind of teaser?
 
Not to worry, JAStewart, it's already prebunked. The Twoofers have no new claims. They have no new evidence. They most likely are going to lean hard on the ISI connection and other such vague, shadowy "isn't THAT interesting?" kinds of things.

I've never seen a really good debunking of that, by the way. I know it's based on one article in the Indian press, which isn't the world's most reliable source (especially for anything re: Pakistan), and I've seen Chussodovsky's (sp?) work criticized pretty harshly, but not a slam-dunk, shut-yer-mouth kind of debunking. Anybody got one?
 
Dear Mr. Avery and followers/worshippers:


I've stated this before, but it certainly warrants iteration, especially considering all of the ignorant expectations you seem to display on the Loose Change forum.

Magnolia Pictures (http://www.magpictures.com/) is not going to take LCFC "global". Mmm K? They are a distributor of minor, independent and expiremental films. You'll be lucky to have it shown in rag-tag movie houses in a few major cities. Movies produced and distributed by Columbia/Tri-Star, Paramount, Time/Warner, MGM, Fox, etc, go global. Loose Change does not. Even if it did go global, it would not have a shred of the impact you foolishly believe it would. You must remember, the greater portion of the human race are beings that think thoughtfully, logically, critically and discriminately. They do not allow themselves to be duped into believing a mythological creation such as Loose Change is anything but fabrication and speculative muse. You should be ashamed of yourselves for being so naive.

Carry on.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Not to worry, JAStewart, it's already prebunked. The Twoofers have no new claims. They have no new evidence. They most likely are going to lean hard on the ISI connection and other such vague, shadowy "isn't THAT interesting?" kinds of things.

I've never seen a really good debunking of that, by the way. I know it's based on one article in the Indian press, which isn't the world's most reliable source (especially for anything re: Pakistan), and I've seen Chussodovsky's (sp?) work criticized pretty harshly, but not a slam-dunk, shut-yer-mouth kind of debunking. Anybody got one?
Click to expand...



The best slam dunk for the ISI claim is "so"?

Until a truther can explain how a single ISI staff member supporting Al Qaeda is evidence that the US Government orchestrated 9/11, the claim is meaningless.

I am sure there are plenty of members of the ISI who support Al Qaeda. But the ISI is a Pakistani agency, not an American one. In the words of Forrest Gump, "It's this whole other country".

-Gumboot
 
I doubt there will be an announcement. Avery is a liar. Isn't it funny though how we are all anxiously awaiting the announcement of what will be one of the worst films mankind has ever produced?
 
Dylan said in a thread the other day that he's hoping to screen it at the Toronto Film Festival in September.

A couple of months ago the die hard twoofers were promising that it would be rivaling Spidy3 this summer as the "must see" movie.

His final farewell won't even make a ripple much less a splash.
 
Quad4_72 said:
I doubt there will be an announcement. Avery is a liar. Isn't it funny though how we are all anxiously awaiting the announcement of what will be one of the worst films mankind has ever produced?
Click to expand...


You obviously haven't seen Spectres of the Spectrum.

-Gumboot
 
Mince said:
You must remember, the greater portion of the human race are beings that think thoughtfully, logically, critically and discriminately. They do not allow themselves to be duped into believing a mythological creation such as Loose Change is anything but fabrication and speculative muse. You should be ashamed of yourselves for being so naive.
Click to expand...









 
Oh, and Dylan was really proud of the LC2/Virgin thing. He said,

"Well, Virgin signed a contract, so essentially, they paid us for the rights to NOT screen Loose Change 2.

Us: 1.
Haters: 0.

Tim and Korey were actually making jokes yesterday about how long it was going to take to be pulled..."


Is he not smart enough to know that CAN'T be a good thing? In the future when he's trying to peddle his snake oil, how will prospective suitors view this?
 
Calcas said:
Oh, and Dylan was really proud of the LC2/Virgin thing. He said,

"Well, Virgin signed a contract, so essentially, they paid us for the rights to NOT screen Loose Change 2.

Us: 1.
Haters: 0.

Tim and Korey were actually making jokes yesterday about how long it was going to take to be pulled..."


Is he not smart enough to know that CAN'T be a good thing? In the future when he's trying to peddle his snake oil, how will prospective suitors view this?
Click to expand...


That is exactly my perspective. Avery got paid one time, and now the video is tainted, just ahead of the Final Cut's release, no less.

Dylan, you're not likely to get paid again for screening rights to Second Edition. Your franchise horse dropped dead out of the gate. How are you ahead 1-0? You got paid one time. You're laughing because you limited your franchising of Second Edition to one payment. I recommend you learn a little about the film industry and economics. People who are not drinking your Kool-Aid (Loose Change forum subscribers) are laughing at you. Leastwise, I am.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom