• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Question

jackchit said:
So the answer is no then.
Shame I was looking forward to Roberts shutting this guy up.
Oh well the "he's too stupid to debate" excuse runs both ways.
You are beginning to look like cowards and we wouldn't want that to happen so I'll drop the jones issue as its clearly too hot to handle.
BTW I had a good birthday thanks.:)
Click to expand...

No one here speaks on behalf of Mark. It would be his choice if he wants to waste his time debating a lunatic. Hell, as I said before he already has debated him. How about you ask him instead though?
 
T.A.M. said:
I was making a general comment, my opinion. If Mark wants to waste his time debating a loud mouth like jones, who is as illiterate as Fetzer on the real issues, than let him. We could use the entertainment...dance monkey dance, or more like "yell monkey yell" so to speak.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

But on the whole you're not for it?
OK i can see why
 
jackchit said:
But on the whole you're not for it?
OK i can see why
Click to expand...

Can you?

Do you see any point in having a debate with a man who simply yells and screams until everyone who is debating with him shuts up out of annoyance? Do you?

TAM
 
T.A.M. said:
Can you?

Do you see any point in having a debate with a man who simply yells and screams until everyone who is debating with him shuts up out of annoyance? Do you?

TAM
Click to expand...

You can't lose an argument if you are wrong, unless you pick on soft targets like avery and bermas who are young and in-experienced.
Again hypocracy by de-bunkers, if someone is shouting all you have to do is wait for the rant to end then make your points.
If this is too much then heck take the hide option.
 
jackchit said:
You can't lose an argument if you are wrong, unless you pick on soft targets like avery and bermas who are young and in-experienced.
Click to expand...
You can't lose an argument if your wrong???????????????? Have you been drinking?
 
jackchit said:
You can't lose an argument if you are wrong, unless you pick on soft targets like avery and bermas who are young and in-experienced.
Again hypocracy by de-bunkers, if someone is shouting all you have to do is wait for the rant to end then make your points.
If this is too much then heck take the hide option.
Click to expand...

I live in Canada, so even if I wanted to debate him, I cannot.

As for your argument above, if I thought Alex Jones was capable of engaging in a calm, rational manner, I'd say go for it...I doubt he is. As for waiting for the yelling to go down, he would just begin it again with the next word evoked.

TAM:)
 
i've seen a video of mark attempting to debate alex jones. it was irrating. alex didn't make any arguments. he just screamed stupid phrases.

alex jones doesn't debate. he just yells ****. that's not debating. he doesn't make arguments. i'm sure that if alex jones would agree to debate, someone would be willing to debate him. but it would need to be a controlled, moderated debate, where he'd automatically forfeit if he "debated" as we've seen him do so many times.

many here would love to debate him, i'm sure. alex just doesn't know how to debate. that's what it comes down to.
 
jackchit said:
pedantic much?
language issues do not add weight to your featherlight arguments.
Click to expand...
If you're having trouble communicating your thoughts, that doesn't add to "my" argument; it takes away from yours.

Read the sentence of yours I quoted above. Did you say what you meant?
 
Didn't Gravy or some other debunker debate Alex Jones, but he ended up weaseling his way out or something like that?
 
OMGturt1es said:
i've seen a video of mark attempting to debate alex jones. it was irrating. alex didn't make any arguments. he just screamed stupid phrases.

alex jones doesn't debate. he just yells ****. that's not debating. he doesn't make arguments. i'm sure that if alex jones would agree to debate, someone would be willing to debate him. but it would need to be a controlled, moderated debate, where he'd automatically forfeit if he "debated" as we've seen him do so many times.

many here would love to debate him, i'm sure. alex just doesn't know how to debate. that's what it comes down to.
Click to expand...
Agreed but i would still like to see Alex Jones debating roberts, I'm no fan of jones I recently listened to his 9/11/01 show and was appalled by his insinuation that the EU was behind the attacks (amongst others) his net of liability was cast over a very wide area and his rantings, well quite frankly absurd.
I just wondered why everyone avoids him even though he should be easy to de-bunk.
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
If you're having trouble communicating your thoughts, that doesn't add to "my" argument; it takes away from yours.

Read the sentence of yours I quoted above. Did you say what you meant?
Click to expand...

I made a statement then entered a caveat, simple English.
 
jackchit said:
Agreed but i would still like to see Alex Jones debating roberts, I'm no fan of jones I recently listened to his 9/11/01 show and was appalled by his insinuation that the EU was behind the attacks (amongst others) his net of liability was cast over a very wide area and his rantings, well quite frankly absurd.
I just wondered why everyone avoids him even though he should be easy to de-bunk.
Click to expand...
He's easy to debunk, but he doesn't accept that he's been debunked and continues bantering on with the same old crap. He doesn't take a hint, and he has a fanbase which follow him like sheep.

So much for us being sheeple :rolleyes:
 
jackchit said:
I made a statement then entered a caveat, simple English.
Click to expand...
Let's walk through it, shall we?

jackchit said:
You can't lose an argument if you are wrong, unless you pick on soft targets like avery and bermas who are young and in-experienced.
Click to expand...
The first part of this statement says, "You can't lose an argument if you are wrong" (emphasis mine). Now that's is just plain weird. How does this work?

argument + wrong = win!

But then you go on to say, "unless you pick on soft targets".

argument + wrong + soft target = lose!

And yet you're claiming that "we" only won "our" arguments against the Loosers because they are "soft targets".

I believe what you were actually trying to insult us with was, "You can't win an argument if you are wrong, unless you pick on soft targets like avery and bermas who are young and in-experienced."

argument + wrong = lose!
argument + wrong + soft target = win!

Logic and language do go together...
 
The Silver Shadow said:
He's easy to debunk, but he doesn't accept that he's been debunked and continues bantering on with the same old crap. He doesn't take a hint, and he has a fanbase which follow him like sheep.

So much for us being sheeple :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Hehe...isn't insanity doing the same tired thing over and over expecting a different result?
 
Jones should seek to debate, not the other way round.

It doesn't matter much to normal people that Jones makes a living off of gullible 'truthers'.

But if he was serious about his beliefs he would want to confront naysayers and try to convince them with his arguments.

So, where is Alex Jones? Why doesn't he visit here? Why doesn't Alex Jones contact Ronald Weick and ask to come on his show to discuss his beliefs?

He doesn't because away from the controlled environment of his own show he is without the comfort of an audience of believers.

So, instead of asking that question here, why don't you, jackchit, pop over to austin and ask Jones yourself?

I'm sure flights are affordable... £485 on Virgin, if you don't mind economy.
 
jackchit said:
Agreed but i would still like to see Alex Jones debating roberts, I'm no fan of jones I recently listened to his 9/11/01 show and was appalled by his insinuation that the EU was behind the attacks (amongst others) his net of liability was cast over a very wide area and his rantings, well quite frankly absurd.
I just wondered why everyone avoids him even though he should be easy to de-bunk.
Click to expand...

people avoid him because he won't really debate. it's a waste of time.

if, rather than responding to my post, you just typed "911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!" over and over, i would stop responding. everyone would.

that's why no one debates jones; he's undebatable, because he refuses to debate.
 
OMGturt1es said:
people avoid him because he won't really debate. it's a waste of time.

if, rather than responding to my post, you just typed "911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!" over and over, i would stop responding. everyone would.

that's why no one debates jones; he's undebatable, because he refuses to debate.
Click to expand...

Ok why the apparent lack of de-bunking of his work?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom