Warning: Jackchit threatens Gravy!

Status
Not open for further replies.
HyJinX said:
Would it be in poor taste (no pun intended) to send Mr. Chit a box of this? This way he can add a little water...make his own Gravy...and yell at it in his own kitchen. Whatcha think?
Click to expand...
i wouldnt be surprised if it provokes him to post a picture of it skewered on a large knife
 
Mobyseven said:
You cannot reasonably expect people who are legitimately worried about the welfare of children in the care of their biological father to not at least make enquiries about it. There is no moral high ground in leaving children in a potentially dangerous situation simply because it would be frowned upon to be a 'busybody'.
Click to expand...

Of course not. My question is to the legitimacy of the concerns in this case, which I find to be exceedingly illegitimate. The way I see it, a couple of people decided to stir up a pot of [rule8] for no good reason, the pot of [rule8] was well and thoroughly stirred, and now some people don't like me pointing out who had spoons in their hands.
 
Mobyseven said:
You cannot reasonably expect people who are legitimately worried about the welfare of children in the care of their biological father to not at least make enquiries about it. There is no moral high ground in leaving children in a potentially dangerous situation simply because it would be frowned upon to be a 'busybody'.
Click to expand...
You have leapt to a number of conclusions. I've flamed people for less, on forums, for making such leaps of assumption about something casually thrown out in a forum conversation.

I think you were a big guy to admit a mistake and apologize for part of some of the misunderstandings -- tip of the cap to you -- but I find your stance as internet psychologist to be a load of bollocks.

That Jackchit posts in the mode of mentally useless isn't significant of much. Perry Logan posted like a deranged maroon, but I'd not consider that a sign that he does not, or would not, love his kids.

DR
 
Last edited:
pagan said:
What is the matter with you guys?

One of the kooks in the truth movement makes some internet threats against one of your heroes. And you make a big deal out of it?
Click to expand...

I can only speak for myself, but who the threat was made against is not the issue. If some "kook" had made a similar threat against Dylan Avery, Alex Jones or any other CTist, I would be equally concerned. I suspect I would not be the only one on this board that feels this way.
 
Let's all just remember how seriously some people take their online incidents...

The "theft" of virtual items in games has led to real people being murdered.

I think there is a mentality of thinking things online aren't significant or serious. I totally disagree. Do people think it's not a big deal if an adult make chats in a sexual manner with a young female online? Of course it's a big deal. It's a massive deal.

Yet, while "sexual grooming" is seen as serious, for some reason expressing intentions of murder is not? What is with that?

Were this nutjob to actually carry out his threat, Dylan Avery would be arrested and likely imprisoned as an accessory to murder. That is NOT a small deal.

Providing an information or material that can aid a person in an expressed desire to commit murder is a serious crime, and Dylan Avery has committed it. Such behaviour is absolutely 100% unacceptable.

Once again we have to remind the 9/11 CTer children, THIS IS NOT A GAME. This is real life. We are talking about real living breathing human beings.

-Gumboot
 
Darth Rotor said:
That Jackchit posts in the mode of mentally useless isn't significant of much. Perry Logan posted like a deranged maroon, but I'd not consider that a sign that he does not, or would not, love his kids.
Click to expand...



I don't see how that's even remotely relevant.

Parents have murdered their children out of "love" before.

The question anyone investigating child abuse asks is "is this child safe?" not "is this child loved?".

-Gumboot
 
boloboffin said:
Of course not. My question is to the legitimacy of the concerns in this case, which I find to be exceedingly illegitimate. The way I see it, a couple of people decided to stir up a pot of [rule8] for no good reason, the pot of [rule8] was well and thoroughly stirred, and now some people don't like me pointing out who had spoons in their hands.
Click to expand...

The post that started all this was one where Jackchit expressed his belief that God killed his wife to remove an obstacle in his path and so that he could raise his children in the manner he sees fit.

Sure, he seems to love them, but that it appears he wasn't granted custody in the first place sets the scene for me. That he sees the death of his wife as an act of God allowing to continue his 9/11 research unhindered sets off alarm bells in my head.

Even if you thought it was not good cause to do so, there are many people here who were genuinely concerned.

As it is, Jackchit now says that he has been visited by social services. In response to this, he has made a death threat against a man who was hardly involved in the issue at all, and has made clear an intention to travel to NYC already now has another purpose.

Does this not set off more alarm bells? Does it not seem as though the original concern may have been justified?
 
Mobyseven said:
And Mark, I doubt you have anything to be worried about. But be careful nonetheless.
Click to expand...
Thanks for your concern. Unlike the truther al Qaeda apologists, when someone says they're going to harm me I take the threat seriously. But since the matter is in the hands of the appropriate people, there really isn't anything to be careful about. There's little I can do if a determined crackpot wants to off me. Luckily for mankind most crackpots aren't that determined.
 
Quote from Jackchit

"BTW if any of the j-ref from the uk are man enough to face the person they accuse then e-mail me admin@beckhamcoverup.com and we can dance...."



I dunno....

Me, personally, would rather have a good ol' fight...

But hey...each to their own...

DB
 
This from the loose change forum

jack chit said:
As for my own situation I have just visited NYC and as it was my first visit I have enjoyed myself greatly, the people were friendly, the food great and the sights fantastic. However the best part was when I sought and confronted Mark Roberts tour guide, like I told him he knew my eyes when they met his gaze but the best sight was him wetting himself without me having to say a word, his last words to me suggested i wouldn't get out of manhatten, well marky I did and now i'm back in Britain... I suggest you are being set up by your operatives because they clearly don't give a **** about you. ha ha ha...... now try to be a big girl and don't make me come back for you.
Click to expand...

Any of this true? I mean aside from the food/people bit?
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8003
 
Last edited:
I think even the 'truthers' realise that jackchit is an embarassing fantasist.

Note how the three posts after jackchits do not reference what he said about gravy. They don't believe him any more than we do.

It's sad but strangely compelling to watch someones mental illness played out for all to see.
 
8den said:
This from the loose change forum



Any of this true? I mean aside from the food/people bit?
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=8003
Click to expand...

I'm gonna go out on a limb and throw the BS flag on this due to the fact that IF JC sacked up and did it.

1. He wouldn't bring his children.
2. If he's 1/2 the parent he clams he wouldn't leave the country without his kids so soon after social services visited to investigate him.
3. The drama queen that he is, he would have taped the encounter and dashed to an internet cafe to put it online before he left America.
4. He made no mention of going to ground zero with "Dylan and the troof crew".
 
Redtail said:
I'm gonna go out on a limb and throw the BS flag on this due to the fact that IF JC sacked up and did it.

1. He wouldn't bring his children.
2. If he's 1/2 the parent he clams he wouldn't leave the country without his kids so soon after social services visited to investigate him.
3. The drama queen that he is, he would have taped the encounter and dashed to an internet cafe to put it online before he left America.
4. He made no mention of going to ground zero with "Dylan and the troof crew".
Click to expand...
Nor did Gravy mention this most likely fictional encounter.

ETA - Besides, didn't our NWO buddies put Jason on the no fly list?
 
I have neither met Jason Holmes nor communicated with him except for a couple of emails a couple of months ago, regarding his homophobic Mark Roberts Gay Spy Myspace page. The only time I've seen truthers at Ground Zero recently was on April 11. Mr. Holmes was not there (I'd know him from his photo on his website).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom