432 shows harmony of Sun, Moon, Earth Design

I believe a coherent answer can be constructed from Jiri's own words:


Lack of "Knowledge self-evident from the analysis"

"Non-intuitive? That is... ...the Frame. The rest of your remarks are just".

"I hand you the" broken "record".

"It is special because"

"Giorgio de Santillana and Hertha von Dechend wrote a study on it, and... ...misapplied... ...calculations, which accounts for... ...errors."

"And still demonstrably does."

"One false statement follows another in... ...my mis-steps. That's kinf of tiring"
 
Last edited:
Jiri said:
Jiri said:
Well done. This line holder does extrapolate to (it forces) several straight lines. Both of us should produce the same lines based on this lineholder, else we'd have to be blind. Go ahead and show us how it is done, and that you now understand this part of the method.
Atta boy, Belz
Click to expand...
Belz... said:
And now it's YOUR turn. Lineholders, please.
Click to expand...

Once you've seen one, you've seen 'em all.
Your call..:p
Click to expand...

Good. So I can now safely assume you don't have them. Liar it is.
 
Jiri said:
.
The talk was of accuracy. It was accuracy related.
If you aren't familiar with the design idea (Cone & Square), being authoritative is too big a suit for you to wear.
Click to expand...
Coming from someone who seems to think that accuracy can be enhanced by zooming in on a scan of a photocopy of a reproduction of a reproduced image of a cave etching, without knowing exactly how the first image was actually made, that's almost hysterically funny. :rolleyes:

Those bubbles you saw were unit circles:)
Click to expand...
Bubbles? :nope:
 
Björn Toulouse said:
...or have the ability to shoot fire out of your mouth.
Click to expand...

Oh, I can totally do that too. I had a video to prove it, but it was burned up.

Jiri, saying what basically amounts to "the frame is evidence of the frame's meaning" is circular reasoning, unsupported by external evidence. As you have obstinately refused to provide clarification or move beyond ad hominem-level discussion, I'll just have to assume you're a troll here to preach your theory.

If you truly aren't a troll, you could start by addressing the various issues of numerical accuracy and precision brought up in this thread. Moreover, you can explain how Osiris numbers can still be special when the number of days in the precessional cycle is not 25,920, therefore all of your Osiris numbers don't relate to a number that is in any way connected to anything.

What the heck is special about the Zodiac, anyway?

If you're just planning to troll, and don't intend to respond in a meaningful way (e.g. you intend to keep claiming things are "obvious" without additional evidence), could you at least be honest about it so I can move from trying to actually talk about stuff to something more productive, like kitten pictures?
 
Jiri said:
A coffer with no lid is just a big tub. The Pharaoh's tomb will never be oped.



Waiting .................................... waiting
with just a millenium gone what would scrape skies is looking up at daisies, but the pyramid still looks brand new.:p
Click to expand...

They don't look brand new. They visibly show wear and are not brand new looking.
 
Jiri said:
Adapted is the right word, because the omnivorous diet will not kill you instantly, but it will limit your life expectancy compared to eating diet our digestive systems require.
.

.
The first leaf of Genesis contains God's instructions to humans on what to eat. Unfortunately, the moment people started eating meat coincides with the moment they lost their Paradise, the Garden of Eden.
Instructions on what meat to eat, or not to eat cannot come from God. Those words are an obvious addition to the O.T. contradicting God's decrees..

Are you a Paradise drop-out? :)
Click to expand...

Meat has been an important part of Hominid diet since before humans. H. habilis, H. erectus, H. ergaster, H. sapiens neanderthalensis, all had tools to hunt and to butcher animals, as did the earliest examples of H. sapiens sapiens.

What supposed decrees by god do the instructions on eating meat contradict?

And since the bible was not written anywhere near the begining of human existance, how can any of it be an accurate representation of what life was like thousands of years earlier.


In short, humans were eating meat before they were humans.
There is evidence of tools and of butchered animal remains. There is no reason to posit this paradise of soy eating humans you picture, or that the biblical text somehow is representative of a vegan earth.
 
Last edited:
Jiri said:
with just a millenium gone what would scrape skies is looking up at daisies, but the pyramid still looks brand new.
Click to expand...
So many of them aren't little more than heaps of rubble and they all definitely have their limestone coverings then?
 
Jiri said:
Once you've seen one, you've seen 'em all.
Your call..:p
Click to expand...

It was rather inconvenient for you that Belz actually asked for those line-holders, yes? It seems you never counted on that. Evasion duly noted and conclusion that you are being deceptive reached. Thank you for proving to me that your claims are utterly bankrupt so I can now dismiss them as meaningless and get on with my life.
 
Gord_in_Toronto said:
I protest the hijacking of this thread!

DJJ was in the process of explaining how "432 shows harmony of Sun, Moon, Earth Design".

Now I'll never find out. Sniff.
Click to expand...

Indeed, and I was looking forward to discovering who the designer was. I'd like to register a complaint with him/her, there's far too many craters on the Moon for my liking. Makes the sky look untidy.
 
Foster Zygote said:
It was rather inconvenient for you that Belz actually asked for those line-holders, yes?
Click to expand...

It was mildly susrprising that immediately following my description of what is understood by 'line-holders' Belz has asked for yet another description, and so I let it slide since I was comfortable presuming that those with genuine interest had duly noted my explanation of 'line-holders'. After all, 'line-holders' are central to my theory.

It seems you never counted on that. Evasion duly noted and conclusion that you are being deceptive reached. Thank you for proving to me that your claims are utterly bankrupt so I can now dismiss them as meaningless and get on with my life.
Click to expand...

You are welcome. Please, get on with your life. Don't even look at any line-holders you may pass by, they could be detrimental to your mental well-being.
 
Last edited:
ReligionStudent said:
Meat has been an important part of Hominid diet since before humans. H. habilis, H. erectus, H. ergaster, H. sapiens neanderthalensis, all had tools to hunt and to butcher animals, as did the earliest examples of H. sapiens sapiens.

What supposed decrees by god do the instructions on eating meat contradict?
Click to expand...

Sorry, but should you not capitalize the word?
As to the instructions, they are there on the first page. However the O.T. is OT to this thread.
Soon, you will claim that I showed you no line-holders, too. So, tell me, do you know what these darned 'line-holders' might be?

And since the bible was not written anywhere near the begining of human existance, how can any of it be an accurate representation of what life was like thousands of years earlier.

In short, humans were eating meat before they were humans.
There is evidence of tools and of butchered animal remains. There is no reason to posit this paradise of soy eating humans you picture, or that the biblical text somehow is representative of a vegan earth.
Click to expand...

Sure, there are six billion would-be carnivores out there, and I am not going to argue the nature of the human digestive system with them all. The info is in books, etc., whoever wants it can go and get it.
 
Foster Zygote said:
+1

They were once covered in a smooth outer layer. The erosion is plainly evident.
Click to expand...

The above is a good illustration of your dishonesty in debating. You know that the great pyramids had been stripped of their stone mantles, one could say 'skinned alive'.
Until these despiccable acts the pyramids were reported to look still like new. The fact should surprise no one, since high quality limestone, and granite are very durable.
If you can be so dishonest about pyramid-weathering, it follows that you can be just as dishonest, when discussing my discovery of mathematical coding in some ancient images.
****************************************
*******************************************
Meet me at the little place behind Notre Dame tomorrow morning, and bring your pea-shooter. Look out for someone like..
 
Paul said:
So many of them aren't little more than heaps of rubble and they all definitely have their limestone coverings then?
Click to expand...

JonnyFive said:
News to me!
Click to expand...

Jonny, check the fork in your tongue. You amaze me how quickly, you have joined the new game in town: 'Let's pretend that Jiri said that the great pyramids are still covered by their stone mantles"
Strawman , anybody?
See you at the Notre Dame tomorrow morning as well :)
 
Jiri said:
'Let's pretend that Jiri said that the great pyramids are still covered by their stone mantles"
Strawman , anybody?
Click to expand...
How about the truth, you said "the pyramid still looks brand new". Tell us, what did the pyramids look like when they were new?
 
Jiri said:
The above is a good illustration of your dishonesty in debating. You know that the great pyramids had been stripped of their stone mantles, one could say 'skinned alive'.
Click to expand...


Actually, it is a dishonest move coupled with an evasion. Your statement, Jiri, was that the great pyramids looked good as new. They don't. Moreover, the original proposition that the typical skyscraper was more utilitarian than the typical pyramid was countered with your whole "good as new" ruse.

So, you evaded the first issue, and now you are dodging and weaving to cover for your dishonesty now. Is this really the style of argument you wish to present?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom