Merged April Gallop / Gallop lawsuit thrown out / Appeal denied

uk_dave

Philosopher
U
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
8,154
Over on LCF Terrorcell is trying to bait Russell Pickering with what is apparently a posting from April Gallop.

Now, I don't know much about this woman, except that she was in the Pentagon at the time of the plane impact.

Terrorcell seems to think that her posting is some kind of endorsement of the 'truth' movement, but let us consider it carefully....


April's response," I CONFESS..I HAVE AN AGENDA" To ensure no life is left behind.

Many injured survivors fell thru the cracks after being devastated.

The real movement started by actual victims and survivors have been splintered by those who have alterior motives...

maybe to make a name for themselves....

maybe to prove they figured out the truth behind 9/11

only God knows their heart's motivation......

At the end of the day, they will gather all this information..and won't be able to do anything (legally) with it..

because they don't have legitimate standing..

My agenda is to bring about a real focus on the issues so we (those who have legal and legitimate standing) to bring about real action.

It is time to gather those who have pure motives to rally around the actual victims and survivors, who won't sell out to bring these unresolved issues to rest, unanswered questions to conclusion, and bring the holes in the official story to closure. agallop@hotmail.com
Click to expand...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7736&view=getnewpost

Is this another case of 'truthers' reading what they want to read into someones statement? It hardly seems to be a ringing endorsement of the 'truth' movement.

April's response," I CONFESS..I HAVE AN AGENDA" To ensure no life is left behind.
Many injured survivors fell thru the cracks after being devastated.
Click to expand...

So her 'agenda' is to work for those injured on 9/11 who have somehow fallen 'thru the cracks'. I assume she means in terms of benefits or conpensation?

The real movement started by actual victims and survivors have been splintered by those who have alterior motives...
Click to expand...

The real movement to get compensation, benefits etc, and perhaps to hold high officials accountable for mistakes made on 9/11?
And she feels this movement has been hijacked by others (Avery? Lyte Trip? Alex Jones?) to further their own agenda.

maybe to make a name for themselves....
maybe to prove they figured out the truth behind 9/11
only God knows their heart's motivation......
Click to expand...

Yep, she hit the nail on the head with the first one.
And by usurping a movement of victims and victims families they hope to attain some kind of respectability.

At the end of the day, they will gather all this information..and won't be able to do anything (legally) with it..
because they don't have legitimate standing..
Click to expand...

That's right, they don't.
They're not professional investigators.
They're not experts in the fields they claim to study.

They don't have a clue.

My agenda is to bring about a real focus on the issues so we (those who have legal and legitimate standing) to bring about real action.
Click to expand...

Real focus? So all the work of the leading lights of the 'truth' movement is unfocused and pointless?

It is time to gather those who have pure motives to rally around the actual victims and survivors, who won't sell out to bring these unresolved issues to rest, unanswered questions to conclusion, and bring the holes in the official story to closure. agallop@hotmail.com
Click to expand...

Oh yes, she loves the 'truth' movement.
 
It doesn't appear that she is too fond of the truth movement at all.

As you said, I think this is another case of conspiracy theorists only seeing what they want to see.
 
What is Russell Pickering's view on the whole 9/11 thing? I get the feeling he doesn't agree with much of the LC stuff.
 
TraitorBasher said:
In that post she says there are holes in the official story. Are you rejecting that bit?
Click to expand...

I am not "rejecting" it. I am simply in disagreement with her.

Just because I agree with one part of her post doesn't mean I have to agree with all of it TB. That is what's known as a False Dilemma.
 
The Doc said:
I am not "rejecting" it. I am simply in disagreement with her.

Just because I agree with one part of her post doesn't mean I have to agree with all of it TB. That is what's known as a False Dilemma.
Click to expand...

So agreeing with Jowenko on 7 doesnt mean I have to agree with him on the towers.

I think the OP is misunderstanding Gallop. She is a truther but she is against the commercial truthers exploiting the situation.
 
TraitorBasher said:
In that post she says there are holes in the official story. Are you rejecting that bit?
Click to expand...
There are holes in the official story of Jebuses' birth in Bethlehem - 4 different versions and details vary. Go check it out!!!!! Big US govt involvement maybe!!!

Troof is out there!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Sorry TB, I don't have to agree with April Gallop on anything.

I posted this because I was amazed (and amused) that terrocell, like so many 'truthers', can read something and spin it as if it's an endorsement of their beliefs.

Ms Gallop does not appear to be saying what Terrocell thinks she's saying.

Just as Silverstein never said what 'truthers' would have you believe he said.

Just as Rumsfeld never said what 'truthers' would have you believe he said.

Just as the coroner at the shanksville crash site never said what the 'truthers' would have you believe he said.

etc etc etc

Ms Gallop mentions that "Many injured survivors fell thru the cracks after being devastated."

Do you agree with this? And if so, what does it mean?

What does she mean by holes in the official account? Are these the same holes the victims have fallen through?

A victim of the 9/11 attack is held aloft by the 'truth movement' as if she is vindication of their efforts. And yet she criticises them for their ulterior motives, their lack of credibility, and their lack of focus on 'the issues'.

I don't have to agree or disagree with April Gallop.

The point is I don't agree with Terrorcell.
 
Keep in mind everytime that Lyte links to that April Gallop endorsement that at one point on the www.pentacon.com website they used to have a blurb about how a cut of the proceedes from sales of the Researchers Edition would go to April Gallop.
She would be a fool not to endorse it given THAT SHE GETS A CUT OF IT!!!!
Lyte has since taken down that wording ever since he put her endorsement up.
I wonder why?
So April is essentially paid off just like Lyte accuses sooo many people of being Paid off to remain silent about 9-11.
I always love it when the truthers use the same tactics that they claim to despise.
 
Someone over at the Loose Change Forum said that Dylan gave April Gallop some money when they visited her about 6 months back. She will apparently be appearing in LCFC, but I suspect it will be along the lines of "the Pentagon was supposed to be the most secure building in America."
 
April Gallop is a 9/11 victim who is permanently physically damaged as a result of this fraudulent attack and she is not afraid to speak out about questions she has regarding the official story.

Now she is financially destitute because she has been denied victim compensation monies promised her and they won't even give her the purple heart that she has been awarded.

Many people in the truth movement including CIT have stepped up to offer her support and help.

For Bobert to accuse her of LYING in regards to her endorsement of our research for financial gain is a direct attack on her integrity and should not be tolerated.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom