On JREF, LC and Criticism

[The Doc]

Alex Jones takes this approach to his movies I've noticed.

He doesn't really make enough specific claims to warrant any kind of specific debunking.

 

[Obviousman]

I'm reminded of the recent posts about how we sometimes pay out on the LC'ers because... well, we can. That being said, I have to agree with some of the things said. Two aspects particularly arise for me:

1. People are indeed right when they point to many "conspiracy" forums that will ban you for a dissenting view.

2. If this 'Final Cut' (Pink Floyd should sue IMO...) is as airtight as they believe, then why not mount legal action with it? If there is undeniable proof, then seek justice through the judicial system. Isn't that the way things go?

 

[TraitorBasher]

Something worth remember...

A conspiracy involves a group of people secretly planning together to commit an ILLEGAL act. Simply secretly planning something as a group is not a conspiracy, though we might use the word, for example "My family conspired to give my sister a surprise birthday party". While the word is used in this way, that example is not, in fact, a conspiracy.

-Gumboot

There are many definitions of conspiracy, you are just giving the legal one

con·spir·a·cy (kn-spîr-s)
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
2. A group of conspirators.
3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.
4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design: a conspiracy of wind and tide that devastated coastal areas.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/conspiracy

 

[gumboot]

There are many definitions of conspiracy, you are just giving the legal one

Given the nature of conspiracy theories, I think the legal one is the only one of real value.

-Gumboot