April 2007 Stundie Nominations

[gumboot]

According to Iraq Body Count it's only 60 - 66,000.

-Gumboot

 

[CHF]

According to Iraq Body Count it's only 60 - 66,000.

That is, however, only the stuff that gets reported by the media.

The real figure of Iraq war dead is probably in the area of 150,000+, IMO.

 

[gumboot]

That is, however, only the stuff that gets reported by the media.

The real figure of Iraq war dead is probably in the area of 150,000+, IMO.

I think it's more an issue of it only being deaths as a direct result of coalition action... Arabs killing other Arabs doesn't count towards their total.

(Although I wonder how they deal with Iraqi government troops fighting).

The deaths in Iraq are actually surprisingly well documented by the media. Perhaps not mainstream American media... but there's certainly a number of international news agencies keeping track of the incidents and gleefully publishing any time civilians get butchered by suicide bombers of another handful of coalition troops get killed.

Frankly it's rather sickening. The media coverage of the Iraq War, from day one, has turned me eternally against them.

What is more interesting is the demographics of the Iraq Body Count statistics, which are overwhelmingly adult males - suggesting the coalition are actually killing very few civilians at all.

-Gumboot

 

[The Doc]

If we're talking about Iraqi deaths as a result of US troops, I can imagine the number would be very small indeed.

If we're talking about Iraqi deaths as a result of insurgents... well that's a whole different story.

 

[gumboot]

If we're talking about Iraqi deaths as a result of insurgents... well that's a whole different story.

Obviously, but you can hardly claim the US Administration killed those Arabs...

The eagerness with which they exterminate each other wasn't spontaneously brought into being by the US invasion of Iraq.

-Gumboot

 

[The Doc]

Obviously, but you can hardly claim the US Administration killed those Arabs...

The eagerness with which they exterminate each other wasn't spontaneously brought into being by the US invasion of Iraq.

-Gumboot

I completely agree

 

[gumboot]

I just realised this is the stundie thread... oops...

No more comments from me...

-Gumboot

 

[Oliver]

Loose Change Magnolia And Halifaxion (Pages 1 2 3 )

People like you really puzzle me. You sit on an internet forum and make both demands and accusations without ANY knowledge of what is actually happening behind the scenes.

...for example: "9/11 was an inside job!".
"We don't know why, but it was!". "Period!".




Sheeple.

 

[uk_dave]

8bitagent:
I believe there was obvious Satanic influence on the overall 9/11 plot NO MATTER who carried it out..."al Qaeda", Mossad, whatever. I also believe the UFO phenomenon fits into the globalist scheme at some level.
However its clear to me real hijackers and real people were on those planes.

Mark Wahlberg, and Family Guy creator Seth Mcfarlane were spose to be on those planes.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7129&st=50&#last

Oh well, that settles it for me then. Definately satanism.

 

[defaultdotxbe]

chipmunk stew:

I'm gonna break my self-imposed ban on answering your posts for the 2nd time today:

That's a TERRIFIC graphic. It's worth a million words I wish I had room to post it on my website!

in reply to:

Hmm... Where have I heard that before...?

[URL]http://fcit.usf.edu/holocaust/arts/PROPAGAN/octopus.JPG[/URL]

for those who do not know, the image is a bit of nazi propaganda from 1938, and godsend is praising it as being "terrific"

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

Ignogance?

Ignarrogance?

 

[Elizabeth I]

GodSend in "The Great Conspiracy! (Not just a Theory)" on this very board:

Yeah, I prefer 'non-actual' thoughts The more 'non-actual', the better Why don't you post one of your 'non-actual' thoughts and I'll SEE what I can do with it

[NOTE: Don't know how to post a screen shot - if someone will tell me, I'll give it a shot.]

 

[defaultdotxbe]

GodSend in "The Great Conspiracy! (Not just a Theory)" on this very board:



[NOTE: Don't know how to post a screen shot - if someone will tell me, I'll give it a shot.]

screen shots arent really necessary for threads here, its mainly for LCF where threads have a habit of vanishing without a trace, a link should be fine

 

[Cl1mh4224rd]

GodSend in "The Great Conspiracy! (Not just a Theory)" on this very board:

Yeah, I prefer 'non-actual' thoughts The more 'non-actual', the better Why don't you post one of your 'non-actual' thoughts and I'll SEE what I can do with it

Oh dear... I can't stop giggling about that...

"dippity der duh do fler guh spee-oooooo...!"

 

[uk_dave]

Cover your eyes ladies, we're talking Masons here......

BTDRTR:
The phallus is also a symbol of their's. The Washington monument being just one example. Supposedly the apron is symbolized to "cover" the phallus, which to them, represents male power over the female. As opposed to the perfect harmony (yin yang) of the male and female. Their ideology is a 180 degree perversion of what *should* be, or what really is.
If they had the slightest shred of dignity or courage at all, they wouldn't hide the underside of the apron.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7162&st=0&#last

Shocking!

 

[gumboot]

Can't have ladies showing the underside of their aprons... it's a slippery slope, showing undersides of aprons. We let smut like that in our streets and next thing you know they'll be parading their ankles like shameless hussies!

-Gumboot

 

[Mobyseven]

To all involved in The Stundies.

While it may not be necessary to say this, I am going to remind people of two of the 'trial rules' for The Stundies. Namely:

Stundie nominations should 'stand alone'. Do not over-embellish introductions, but do provide comments. Do not use any blatant ad hominem attacks.

...and...​

Please post the nomination under the real screenname of the nominee, and not under a slightly altered name (e.g. Killclown, Roxpup, Do-over).

I post this in response to Darat's warning to the regular users of the CT sub-forum.

Make sure that nominations are being posted because of the arguments or claims being put forward and not simply because you dislike the person.

This isn't to say that Killtown, Dylan, etc, aren't fair game (just as HeyLeroy is ), it's just a reminder that not everything they post is Stundie-material, and it could sometimes be considered an ad hominem to post said material here, just because of a spelling error, or a rant, or similar.

Be advised too that even if you do post such nominations here, they won't make it through to the final vote. If that means once filtering is complete we end up with only five choices, so be it. But I will not let ad hominems slip through, as I did not with March.

Peace Out

Mobyseven

 

[Belz...]

Oh yeah, you're really socking it to her...with your cliché strawmen.

Please, my Gullible Dubya loveing ,Arab hating bastids.

Yep. That'll show them.

So, if you kill one million Arabs, you are not a Arab hater?

I don't hate flies. But I kill lots of 'em.

Which of us is "Dubya loving"? Evidence?
Which of us is "Arab hating"? Evidence?
Which of us is "warmongering"? Evidence?

Fact: Americans have made war on the Arabs and killed xxx xxx If that isn't hate? What is?

Ah! Good. Then all the NON-americans here are scott-free ?

 

[apathoid]

Probably not Stundie worthy, but funny nonetheless..

i dont believe that these aliens are all nice lil green men either. these global elites are slaves themselves. they've pretty much traded their "souls" in return for power and wealth on earth. in return they are charged with the task of having the vast majority of the human race to give total control to the elite and return us all back to what we were meant to be to them ... slaves

Link.

have you ever wondered about the so called "missing link"? as far as the connection from homo erectus to homo sapien. i personally think that homo sapiens were created by these "fallen angels." you're an advanced civilization ... traveling to a planet to mine ... you find this primitive beings .. and think .. cheap labor .. but they're stupid and dont follow orders very well. so they then manipulate the dna of homo erectus for a more intellegent commandable being.

Link.

i DO NOT have evidence that the passengers from the flights on 9/11 were given to aliens. i only entertain the idea as a slight possibility. as i said before .. i have virtually no evidence. so please dont get all bunched up like i'm wearing a tin foil hat here.

Link.

 

[tacodaemon]

I like this one because it just captures the essence of people like skepticalcriticalguy who never met a conspiracy theory they didn't believe:

ERich, around here most still believe Oswald killed JFK, and Osama did 9/11. You won't convince anybody the moon landings were faked.