The testimony of Pentagon police officers SGT Lagasse and SGT Brooks.

Lyte Trip said:
Lagasse has ALWAYS placed the plane on the north side which is really the only relevant detail to our "smoking gun" claim.
Click to expand...

despite that you haven't interviewed anyone else that places the plane where it actually was?

You can't take only one part of their testimony and ignore the rest
 
Lyte Trip said:
They have marginalized and ignored every other report of discrepancies in the official story.

We did not think it would be different this time.
Click to expand...

Thats funny. I remember asking you to "mark my words" some time ago when I said your little video would be nothing more than a blip on the radar, go nowhere, and result in nothing like the indictments and arrests you were claiming. I also recall you guaranteeing we would have to apologize...havent seen anyone do it yet.

So I was correct, and you were wrong on the impact of your video...correct?

TAM:)
 
Hyperviolet said:
Lyte,

While your video puts the official flight path into question, it is completely illogical to assume that the eye witness testimony is valid when it suits your pre- determined point of view and ignore it when they state that, without doubt, they saw the plane strike the building.
Click to expand...
Lyte: Hyperviolet is one your guys, please respond to his very logical question.

Hyper: Very good question.
 
Lyte Trip said:
It is a logical fallacy to suggest that he is incorrect about his placement of the plane because he was incorrect about his placement of the cab especially since this is a minor detail in comparison.
Click to expand...

He also moved the light poles. The fact that he had to move the poles and the cab hundreds of feet north in order for his memory to make sense should tell you that he was mistaken.
 
Lyte: did your witnesseses see the plane fly OVER or INTO the Pentagon?
 
BECAUSE YOU LIE AND ABUSE WITNESS ACCOUNTS OF A HORRIBLE AND TRAGIC EVENT, CATDUCK WILL GET YOU WHEN YOU ARE SLEEPING.

8790460af3ea17b8a.jpg
 
Lyte Trip said:
They have marginalized and ignored every other report of discrepancies in the official story.

We did not think it would be different this time.
Click to expand...

That's what happens in criminal investigations, the testimonies that don't fit with the others are usually discarded.
 
Lyte Trip said:
They have marginalized and ignored every other report of discrepancies in the official story.

We did not think it would be different this time.
Click to expand...

Thats because most people are smart enough to realize that eyewitness reports are often full of discrepancies, and rely on physical evidence instead.

The ones that aren't smart enough to realize that, end up becoming truthers.

If there weren't discrepancies in the eyewitness reports, I might worry.
 
Hyperviolet said:
Lyte,

While your video puts the official flight path into question, it is completely illogical to assume that the eye witness testimony is valid when it suits your pre- determined point of view and ignore it when they state that, without doubt, they saw the plane strike the building.
Click to expand...
Please respond to Hyperviolet's comment.
 
CHF said:
It's a simple question Lyte: did your witnesseses see the plane fly OVER or INTO the Pentagon?
Click to expand...


Neither.

They ALL saw a plane on the north side of the station and then witnessed a big fireball that concealed the impact/flyover.

Like this:

Flyover.gif
 
Lyte trip - December 5th, 2006:

I have obtained extremely compelling evidence, and compiling it, and will present it to the world including the authorities.

But since of course the 9/11 movement has been marginalized as "nuts" and the implications of this don't sit too well with people in position of "authority" it is necessary to make sure that it becomes as public information as possible.

So we are preparing to make that a reality so the authorities will have no choice but to address it.
Click to expand...

so which authorities have you given the evidence to as of now Lyte?

TAM:)
 
DavidJames said:
Please respond to Hyperviolet's comment.
Click to expand...

It was addressed in detail in the OP.

None of them saw the impact.....they saw the fireball.

ALL of them saw the plane on the north side.

It is impossible for the plane to have caused the physical damage if it was on the north side.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Neither.

They ALL saw a plane on the north side of the station and then witnessed a big fireball that concealed the impact/flyover.
Click to expand...

The "impact/flyover?"

In other words you don't even know what your own theory is??? Maybe it hit, maybe it didn't?

You gotta be kidding me.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Lagasse has ALWAYS placed the plane on the north side which is really the only relevant detail to our "smoking gun" claim.

What "differences" are you talking about?
Click to expand...

Im not sure, its been awhile since I listened to his statement from 2002, but I do remember him saying he actually saw the plane hit the Pentagon, and I even think he said he saw "American Airlines" on it.

Not sure though. I'll try to look it up.

/S
 
Lyte Trip said:
It was addressed in detail in the OP.

None of them saw the impact.....they saw the fireball.

ALL of them saw the plane on the north side.

It is impossible for the plane to have caused the physical damage if it was on the north side.
Click to expand...
So when they say something you like, you believe them, when they say something you don't like, you dismiss it.

woo woo.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Neither.

They ALL saw a plane on the north side of the station and then witnessed a big fireball that concealed the impact/flyover.
Click to expand...

as stated to you, a fly over would have affected the fireball, even long after a fly over was done. and anyone with a brain could tell you, that the point at which you indicate a "pull up" would have been noticed
by your own witnesses

the witnesses to the south of the pentagon on the freeway
the witnesses on the other side of the impact site
the witnesses to the north.

Yet none have come forward about seeing a fly over.

your animation just proves what you wanted it to prove.
 
Lyte Trip said:
It was addressed in detail in the OP.

None of them saw the impact.....they saw the fireball.

ALL of them saw the plane on the north side.

It is impossible for the plane to have caused the physical damage if it was on the north side.
Click to expand...

Then the physical damage was faked?

By the way did anybody actually see the plane at the other side of the Pentagon? You know after the fly over.
 
T.A.M. said:
i think the location of a static object (a stopped cab) would be easier to remember than that of an object travelling overhead at 500 mph...but thats just my opinion...

TAM:)
Click to expand...

You aren't thinking logically.

The plane flying by was likely one of the most memorable and significant events of SGT Lagasse's life.

He could not have seen it at all if it was on the opposite side of the station.

Did you watch the testimony?

Will you please at least view the 8 minute clip linked in the OP?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom