• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jim Ritter & The Ntsb Animation

rearnakedchoke

Banned
R
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
150
The NTSB says the impact is at 09:37:45 as signed by Jim Ritter (Chief of Vehicle Performance) in the Flight Path Study.
1. Does the NTSB animation show the aircraft too high to hit the light poles at 09:37:44.. yes or no.
2. Does the csv file provided by the NTSB show the aircraft too high to hit the light poles at 09:37:44 .yes or no...
3. If trends are continued based on vertical speed in the csv file or animation through 09:37:45, will the aircraft hit the pentagon.. yes or no.
4. The raw data JDX claims to be decoded showing 273 feet Radar Altitude at 09:37:47, is that to high to hit the pentagon.. yes or no.
5. Does the flight path shown in the animation corroborate with pentagon police officers at the Citgo Gas station... yes or no...

6. Have any of you emailed JDX to set up a time/date for proper debate? Yes or no...
Just answer YES OR NO... do not want excuses.. or 'possible error'. Just YES OR NO!
just as would be in a court of law
Dont confuse the subject.

BTW!
did anyone see that John Lear. .Son Of the Learjet" is with P4T now?http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Trut...?showtopic=5394
 
rearnakedchoke said:
6. Have any of you emailed JDX to set up a time/date for proper debate? Yes or no...
Click to expand...
Who gives a flying **** about a debate. Has JDX contacted any authorities with his "evidence, Yes or no?

This is serious ****, why is he debating on an Internet forum, making DVD's and issuing self promoting "press releases" instead of banging down the doors of the police, district attorney's, lawyers, insurance investigators, etc.?
 
yawn....we have seen all of this, weeks ago...get with it rnc.

and NO, to your question re JDX, with a "not gonna" added.

TAM:)
 
Can someone define what a "proper debate" is, in regards to talking to someone like JDX?
 
rearnakedchoke said:
6. Have any of you emailed JDX to set up a time/date for proper debate? Yes or no...
Click to expand...
Yes. Mr. Balsamo initially accepted my debate challenge, then declined and called for my execution. You know, as in murder. That's your leader. You must be very proud of him.

I tried again, and he again declined, with several excuses IIRC: no time, doesn't want anything in writing, he needed to assemble a team including FBI and NTSB agents in order to debate me. I then put the challenge out to all members of P4T&PVLIC

How about you, rearnaked? Your evidence that flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon against mine that it did. Simple internet debate for all to see. Do you agree?

Yes or no?
 
Last edited:
rearnakedchoke said:
The NTSB says the impact is at 09:37:45 as signed by Jim Ritter (Chief of Vehicle Performance) in the Flight Path Study.
1. Does the NTSB animation show the aircraft too high to hit the light poles at 09:37:44.. yes or no.
2. Does the csv file provided by the NTSB show the aircraft too high to hit the light poles at 09:37:44 .yes or no...
3. If trends are continued based on vertical speed in the csv file or animation through 09:37:45, will the aircraft hit the pentagon.. yes or no.
4. The raw data JDX claims to be decoded showing 273 feet Radar Altitude at 09:37:47, is that to high to hit the pentagon.. yes or no.
5. Does the flight path shown in the animation corroborate with pentagon police officers at the Citgo Gas station... yes or no...

6. Have any of you emailed JDX to set up a time/date for proper debate? Yes or no...
Just answer YES OR NO... do not want excuses.. or 'possible error'. Just YES OR NO!
just as would be in a court of law
Dont confuse the subject.

BTW!
did anyone see that John Lear. .Son Of the Learjet" is with P4T now?http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Trut...?showtopic=5394
Click to expand...

Options.

1. Take it to the authorities, yes/no.
2. Take it to the families, yes/no.
3. Take it to the main stream press, yes/no.
4. Take it to a lawyer,yes/no.
5. Post on internet forum, yes/no.
6. Run away and make DVD, yes/no.
 
No reply to my debate challenge from Mr. naked? That's the second 9/11 denier tonight who suddenly remembered a cake in the oven as soon as I challenged him to a debate.

Afraid of the truth, "truth" movement? Stop cowering and face the facts, won't you? You'll find that you are not magically transported to a FEMA death camp for being wrong.
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
No reply to my debate challenge from Mr. naked? That's the second 9/11 denier who suddenly remembered a cake in the oven as soon as I challenged him to a debate.

Afraid of the truth, "truth" movement? Stop cowering and face the facts, won't you? You'll find that you are not magically transported to a FEMA death camp for being wrong.
Click to expand...

Thats a pretty lonely thread you started for TC as well Gravy. Making its way slowly down the thread list. I'd bump it...but what good would it do.

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Thats a pretty lonely thread you started for TC as well Gravy. Making its way slowly down the thread list. I'd bump it...but what good would it do.

TAM:)
Click to expand...
Have I mentioned in what low regard I hold people who lie about 9/11 and then run away? Can't they pick another subject to lie about? How about Spain? Why don't they lie about Spain?
 
Everyone lies about Spain, lol. They want to carve their own path.

TAM:)
 
rearnakedchoke said:
The NTSB blah blah blah <removed repetitive crap previously posted by rear naked choke>
Click to expand...

Rear Naked Choke

I am not even going to begin to speculate about the possible connections between your status as a D'oh Boy messenger and your choice of user ID.

I am simply going to ask you why on earth you started three new threads on the same subject today, including one that is a repeat of one you posted a while back.

So? Why is that?
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
Have I mentioned in what low regard I hold people who lie about 9/11 and then run away? Can't they pick another subject to lie about? How about Spain? Why don't they lie about Spain?
Click to expand...

They don't want to face the Spanish Inquisition!

But I agree with you 100%. These lowlifes lie and lie and run away over and over. It's despicable.
 
rearnakedchoke said:
The NTSB says the impact is at 09:37:45 as signed by Jim Ritter (Chief of Vehicle Performance) in the Flight Path Study.
1. Does the NTSB animation show the aircraft too high to hit the light poles at 09:37:44.. yes or no.
2. Does the csv file provided by the NTSB show the aircraft too high to hit the light poles at 09:37:44 .yes or no...
3. If trends are continued based on vertical speed in the csv file or animation through 09:37:45, will the aircraft hit the pentagon.. yes or no.
4. The raw data JDX claims to be decoded showing 273 feet Radar Altitude at 09:37:47, is that to high to hit the pentagon.. yes or no.
5. Does the flight path shown in the animation corroborate with pentagon police officers at the Citgo Gas station... yes or no...

6. Have any of you emailed JDX to set up a time/date for proper debate? Yes or no...
Just answer YES OR NO... do not want excuses.. or 'possible error'. Just YES OR NO!
just as would be in a court of law
Dont confuse the subject.

BTW!
did anyone see that John Lear. .Son Of the Learjet" is with P4T now?http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Trut...?showtopic=5394
Click to expand...
Oh no, john lear, How did you fall for my sock? Does John Lear fall for nut case ideas too? I do not care if you get Chuck Yeager, JDX still does not have a clue about 9/11 and 77.

1. No, flight 77 is not close to the Pentagon yet on the data JDX has to check the heading and the DME. Plus it hit the Pentagon, bad question. Dumb question. Your teacher was wrong, there are dumb questions.

2. Flight 77 was not over the light posts at 44. next

3. JDX team only has second 44, they have do not have a clue how to put the frames to time. NEXT

4. When the radar altimeter reads 273 (is that slant range?) JDX has no idea where 77 is! Not a single idea! BTW, 77 can not be north of the CITGO station with 273 and a MSL of 400 plus feet. JDX can tell you why but it would ruin his whole MOVIE. Surprise! JDX lies!

5. NO< the policemen were interviewed in 2001, and they both said 77 hit the pentagon. One of them saw 77 hit the lamp posts. You know the lamp post on the ground on a track of about 61.2 degrees into the impact point they said 77 did on 9/11. Sorry your witnesses are on the record FIVE (5) years ago. DO OVER! You guys should research your witnesses in a court of law they would impeach themselves. Sorry you have bad data and only a bad researcher would be this bad at research. See I can do a little Yogi too.

6. It is now, hurry back! OOPS you were banned for lack of facts JDX. You do not play well with others. Sorry you were banned. Bet you type too slow to be any threat in a typing debate anyway. What is this phone fetish you have?

Are you JDX's drone? YES or NO?
 
Gravy said:
Yes. Mr. Balsamo initially accepted my debate challenge, then declined and called for my execution. You know, as in murder. That's your leader. You must be very proud of him.

I tried again, and he again declined, with several excuses IIRC: no time, doesn't want anything in writing, he needed to assemble a team including FBI and NTSB agents in order to debate me. I then put the challenge out to all members of P4T&PVLIC

How about you, rearnaked? Your evidence that flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon against mine that it did. Simple internet debate for all to see. Do you agree?

Yes or no?
Click to expand...

no need for debate, ive seen russell pickerings sight, and why a debate? isnt everything i need to know in the unbiased 9/11 commissions report?
 
beachnut said:
I do not care if you get Chuck Yeager, JDX still does not have a clue about 9/11 and 77.
Click to expand...


I'd care. It would be sad to see such evidence of a well-respected hero falling to Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's just sucks!
 
Gravy said:
Can't they pick another subject to lie about? How about Spain? Why don't they lie about Spain?
Click to expand...



Did you know Spain is the largest consumer of fine Scotches in the world? They use it to wash their feet!

It's true! :)
 
rearnakedchoke;2463139Just answer YES OR NO... do not want excuses.. or 'possible error'. Just [SIZE=4 said:
YES OR NO!
[/SIZE]just as would be in a court of law
Click to expand...



That's not how it works in court, either.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom