The Loose Change forum

Yeah, I've had a look around, some interesting stuff here. The paranormal and conspiracy theories probably interest me less than the actual people who believe in them. As a rational person, I can't actually get my head around a mindset where you accept that lizards rule the world, or that Derek Acorah (a UK medium) can speak with the "spirit world", or that a spirit world even exists.

Anyway, I'm dragging this off topic. Err, that Killtown eh? He's quite something isn't he?
 
Sergio Agüero said:
Anyway, I'm dragging this off topic. Err, that Killtown eh? He's quite something isn't he?
Click to expand...
Killtown is a lot of fun at times. He's like the annoying baby that when he doesn't get what he wants, he'll cry, bang his hands and feet on the floor and call you a shill! Then there are other times that he shows something, is debunked, and keeps asking it over and over again ("But isn't it POSSIBLE for there to be no plane?")...

Killtown has the potential of being a great, self-deprecating, comedian!
 
The Silver Shadow said:
Killtown has the potential of being a great, self-deprecating, comedian!
Click to expand...



I don't think KT has enough self-awarenes to be self-deprecating. He's like an idiot savant of good questions - he can sometimes ask a really good one, but then completely misses the answer.

There was one time on LCF, and the no-planers were arguing with the CDers, and KT, in an attempt to mock those who believe actual planes were used at the WTC, asked, "Would you fly a fully loaded plane into a building you had wired with explosives?"

Of course, the answer is no, so there were no explosives. He came up with, no, so there are no planes!
 
self-deprecating comedian, and he wouldn't even know it! If he could go on a radio show or something and debate with one of us, I would like to see how long it would take for him to contradict his statements...
 
interesting the constitution and the bill of rights are not in pencil nor in blood -- but the sure have cost us the
people who fight the wars for these "they" people.
Click to expand...
Mixed metaphor overload. Help me!!!!!!!!!!
 
sleepy2k16 said:
Mark Koernke will be up in 2 hours at 5pm EST to talk about this here:
http://www.live365.com/stations/edtheak47

Stop and consider this all you 911 'truthseekers' out there.
THREE buildings were wired for CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
TWO were hit by planes. The third was SUPPOSED to be as well!

The third, building #7 was where the operation was being run FROM and the Illuminists planned to take OUT their helpers.
But something went WRONG with their plans and so they concocted another FAIRY tale saying Flight #77 was headed for the White House.

Mark voiced this on Friday's show and it makes PERFECT SENSE!

The globalists were fully planning on betraying those who helped STAGE 911 and MURDER THEM AS WELL!
Click to expand...

LCF Thread
Proxy

Sleepy is still not getting enough it would seem.

So now the conspirators are conspiring to kill the conspirators.

Again the notion of islamic terrorists hijacking and flying planes into buildings and their subsequent collapse is seen as outlandish to Cters, but they bang out this kind of lunacy and it, "makes PERFECT SENSE"?

I got banned for asking for evidence to support the claim for remote-controlled planes. If they need to ban people from LCF, surely its the ones that keep churning out this crap.
 
Sleepy @ LC
But something went WRONG with their plans and so they concocted another FAIRY tale saying Flight #77 was headed for the White House.
Click to expand...

a) I have never heard anyone say Flight 77 was headed for the White House
b) Flight 77 hit the Pentagon...
 
The Doc said:
a) I have never heard anyone say Flight 77 was headed for the White House
b) Flight 77 hit the Pentagon...
Click to expand...
:)

Ok, sleepy2k16 isn't the best researcher in the world, not even among truthers. Probably they mean flight 93.
(Not that that makes sense ...)

Someone actually makes a logical remark:
Shoestring@LCF said:
I really don't think that WTC 7 was an intended target for any plane. Surely if it had been, it would have been wired up to implode starting near the top, like the twin towers did. Instead, its demolition began at the bottom, just like a typical controlled demolition.
Click to expand...
To which, sadly, our own einsteen answers:
einsteen@LCF said:
That's only a matter of a sequence, probably they could start it at each point they wanted. Maybe they used advanced remote controlled charges.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
einstein @ LCF said:
That's only a matter of a sequence, probably they could start it at each point they wanted. Maybe they used advanced remote controlled charges.
Click to expand...
Emphasis mine.

Wow. That sounds like some solid evidence :rolleyes:.
 
The Doc said:
a) I have never heard anyone say Flight 77 was headed for the White House
b) Flight 77 hit the Pentagon...
Click to expand...

I noticed that, but like Fire I thought sleepy was referring to flight 93.

I was most likely giving sleepy too much credit on that, considering how baffling that entire post was.
 
alexvegas (possibly the only poster there who isn't involved in the movie, a JREFer, an NWO fearing surivalist or an anti-semite) at LCF:

I know I don't. I would describe myself as a sceptic, which is what JREFers are SUPPOSED to be.

I question things, and base my opinions on what I find. That is why I am an atheist. It is why I don't believe the world is run by lizards. It is why I know that 9/11 was an inside job.

JREFers form an opinion, and then manipulate the evidence to suit their predetermined outcome. When the evidence is not manipulatable they resort to tactics like yours.

That is not scepticism, it is propaganda peddling.
Click to expand...

Something that I've found interesting about the "truthers" and their opponents is the way that, with a few words switched around, posts like this could be written by someone from the other side.

I know I don't. I would describe myself as a sceptic, which is what truthers are SUPPOSED to be.

I question things, and base my opinions on what I find. That is why I am an atheist. It is why I don't believe the world is run by lizards. It is why I know that 9/11 wasn't an inside job.

Truthers form an opinion, and then manipulate the evidence to suit their predetermined outcome. When the evidence is not manipulatable they resort to tactics like yours.

That is not truth seeking, it is propaganda peddling.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom