Close enough, I guess.
Sorry, Edge. I've always counted you as one of the more civil posters from the fundamentalist camp, but even if others have dealt you similar nasties and goaded you into it, some of the comments cited are over the line between very opinionated and bigoted.
Things like that make me angry especially when she, “Kathy" isn't here to defend herself.
The one thing I don't do is talk behind your backs.
Some of the things that you say are insulting, I turn my check once and twice but the third time well then, there a time to fight and a time to win.
Like I said there are friends of mine who don’t believe and I get along with them fine.
You, in my eyes, are in danger.
So I might just be your best friend or just a nuisance to you what ever you think
nails3jesus0
Just the name is An insult, she took what the reverend said about her and turned it on Kathy.
Kathy wasn’t even there.
And why are you crying about this?
Like you all don’t do this every day on here.
Go to the flame war the Atheist started there's your example.
And I'm not perfect that’s why I ask for guidance every day.
And yes I flamed his (_!_) back, it’s called venting!
If I were bigoted I wouldn’t be here.
I can take it so should you.
And if the Christian god did exist, I'd hope I am pushing it. I'd hope I'm pushing every cosmic button he's got.
Whether you like it or not the truth is the truth you can't change that and you are fulfilling a prophecy.
Does this mean that some one who is covered by the cross, but performs occasional unrighteous works is some one you would rather have in your community than one who is uncovered but righteous?
Of course not, would you want to deal with slings X?
People who say they are but are not are in even deeper bullspit.
I would have to beat him up.
