Jesus created Sex

Davidjayjordan said:
Because most of you lose focus and concentration, so easily.. allow me to refocus you back to the beginning.

SEX was NOT the original SIN, as is taught in the church system, and yet it was the FIRST COMMANDMENT.

SEE http://www.geocities.com/davidjayjordan/OriginalSinwasNotSex.html

.
Click to expand...

DJJ, you have become nothing but a spamming troll. All you do is insult and link to your webpage countless times.

We all know you changed the dates of your prophecy but refuse to answer our questions about it. We have no choice but to assume you to be a fraud.
 
Hokulele said:
Wrong, juggling is based on skill earned through hard work and practice. There is nothing about chance in juggling.
Click to expand...

I read an interesting article (unfortunately forget where now) that dealt with the combinatorics of juggling. It seems that if you want the balls to stay up the numbers have to come up right. No fudging. I guess perhaps that's why DJJ is no friend of juggling.
 
I'm still waiting for a response, David, or do you admit you are lying?

Here is a link to it, just in case you cannot find it yourself.
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Shame on you for suggesting such a vile thing.

The Lord is hardly impressed with your slandering of Him. I would suggest retracking it now.
Click to expand...

Nope.
1: I am not christian and as such your "lord" have no power over me what so ever.
2: You can only slander a person which actually either have or do exist. I have seen no evidence to support this about your "Lord"
3: Slavery and other such nonsense which requires one to refer to another being as "lord" have been outlawed around here for a couple of centuries
4: The recent years behavior of several clergy in regards to small children seem to suggest that such a precedence in regards to the behavior of your "lord" does indeed exist.
5: your "Lord" is the only one capable of telling anyone if it is indeed slander. should he exist, he is more than welcome to send a couple of lawyers by. With the voyeristic tendencies of him and his family, he should be able to find me quiet easily.
6:I don't know shame.
 
Miss Anthrope said:
Oh look, the guy who altered the dates of his prophecies but has yet to explain it is lecturing us on science again.
Click to expand...

Somebody has to lecture you on true science rather than your priests of luck and chance. And even with prophecy, you are finnally starting to understand the mere BASICS.

It takes time, but even the hard hearted and close minded catch the simpliest of concepts.
 
Hokulele said:
I would suggest that is not all he is using loosely. ;)
Click to expand...

When the Lord told Adam and Eve to be 'Fruitful and Multiply'... brethren, the only way to do that is have sex and make babies. It comes naturally and they obeyed and had children.

Darn. I assumed you guys and gals knew this basic sexual method, rather than me having to tell you.

The first commandment was 'Have Sex'
 
Davidjayjordan said:
When the Lord told Adam and Eve to be 'Fruitful and Multiply'... brethren, the only way to do that is have sex and make babies. It comes naturally and they obeyed and had children.

Darn. I assumed you guys and gals knew this basic sexual method, rather than me having to tell you.

The first commandment was 'Have Sex'
Click to expand...

That is, of course, a loose construction of the word "commandment." In the Bible (remember the bible? That book you like to cite but seem rarely to read with care?) it's not given as a commandment, but as a part of a blessing, involving a number of instructions, of which it is only one. It can be taken as an order or an instruction, but "commandment" is stretching the point.

Now, back to the meat of the subject. You keep dodging mine. Cut the ad hominem junk and the links and the avatar analysis, why not, and address my question, last broached in post number 378 (I'll make it easier for you and give you the link: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2437051&postcount=378 ), a question that can be asked with no reference to skepticism, nihilism, or any other such diversions from the subject, but entirely on the basis of Biblical study and the content of the Apostles' Creed. How about it?
 
Davidjayjordan said:
When the Lord told Adam and Eve to be 'Fruitful and Multiply'
Click to expand...
That so-called god yours told them, not you, them to be sex nuts and not you. You so-called christains just love to transfer things your so-called god said to other so-called people in that book (written by men) to justify your actions. And by the way where to hell did the wifes of so-called Adam and Eve so-called sons come from...................:rolleyes:

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Davidjayjordan said:
Arthur at least you are sane rather than the replies of some of the others.

But NO, Arthur I need no validation from any HERE. People who have found truths, try to share them, that's called love. people without truths or without love try to share nothing and pull down everything.

As for self righteousness that's the athiests religion as they love only themselves and not even the other athiests that much. They relish in their self righteousness just like the scribes and pharisees.

Yet with the Lord, no one is righteous as we are all in the same boat and EQUAL. So there again, you have more fallicies, probably because you have only really studied and believed the religion of atheism.

Its one HELL of a religion, but people get what they want and what they deserve.

Your choice, your responsibility.

Now back to Jesus created Sex
Click to expand...

People that actually KNOW the TRUTH, also know that it does not need to be shared. The only motivation to share, is the human need for validation, and if you need that, you obviously don't know the truth.

You THINK you know the truth and require others to validate it. The easiest way to validate it? Get 'unbelievers' to attack it. Martyrdom makes you think you know the truth.
 
Beerina said:
Sexual reproduction MIGHT very well have started at the single-cell stage, PERHAPS an incomplete split when a cell divided, or PERHAPS two cells that, FOR WHATEVER REASON, were able to exchange some kind of genetic material.

I do NOT know if it happened this way, but a good vector might have been a cell that mildly re-juggled its genetics on every split. "Mating" between cells COULD HAVE BEEN a completely separate development a billion years later.
Click to expand...

Dear Beerina, do come back from dreamland.... with your might have, perhaps, could have, for whatever reason.... non reasoning. For if ever there was evidence that evolutionists totally believe in luck and chance you have provided it for us literally with your words.

You just don;t know, and evolutionists just do NOT know how the sexes developed, even if you try to diefy a cell into magically juggling and re-juggling DNA, as if they had already developed a mind of their own.

I hope you see how insane your little treatise is, and hope you get more scientific in your explanations rather than just providing us with these light moments of laughter.
 
The_Fire said:
Nope.
1: I am not christian and as such your "lord" have no power over me what so ever.
2: You can only slander a person which actually either have or do exist. I have seen no evidence to support this about your "Lord"
3: Slavery and other such nonsense which requires one to refer to another being as "lord" have been outlawed around here for a couple of centuries
4: The recent years behavior of several clergy in regards to small children seem to suggest that such a precedence in regards to the behavior of your "lord" does indeed exist.
5: your "Lord" is the only one capable of telling anyone if it is indeed slander. should he exist, he is more than welcome to send a couple of lawyers by. With the voyeristic tendencies of him and his family, he should be able to find me quiet easily.
6:I don't know shame.
Click to expand...

7. "Retrack"?
 
J. Arthur Hastur said:
People that actually KNOW the TRUTH, also know that it does not need to be shared.
Click to expand...

Truth needs to be experienced, but false skeptics are afraid to go beyond the norm and the status quo and therefore deny that there is anything beyond their safe bounds of nothingness.

And yet some that have experienced truths in real life, out of love, do try and tell the complacent and lazy that there is a whole new world where they could ENTER IN and be part of.


..
 
J. Arthur Hastur said:
He's not here to debate, he's here to be attacked.
Click to expand...

I'm Here to learn and progress, teach what I know and go beyond.

Most false skeptics are HERE to waste time and make themselves feel better about their religion when they see others are also sitting in their pews. And I do mean pews.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom