Nother LCF psychotic

[Mobyseven]

No, mobyseven, what you are genuinely worried about is using this mans kids as weapons against him in the 9/11 debunker vs. truther fight.

You are a despicable human being.

I honestly don't care what you think about me, though if you attack me personally again I will report you - which would be ironic considering.

If any debunker stated that they believed God killed their ex-wife who had custody of their children so that they would be able to better fight against the 9/11 truth movement and raise their kids as such, I would also be worried about that.

Now, have you reported me yet as you said you would?

Or will you concede that I have a point?

And has somebody contacted the authorities yet, so that we can stop debating this here and let the people who make the decisions, make the decision?

 

[Orphia Nay]

He was putting his children first by checking to see if there was anything suspect that he wouldn't want them to see.

Are you seriously suggesting social services should investigate him because he tried to make some money selling a story to a paper?

Your level of misunderstanding is so great it's probably pointless to respond to that but for the sake of your edification I will do so.

Yes, he 'was putting his children first by checking to see if there was anything suspect' on the computer. That's. Not. The. Point. He let the children's computer be taken away for no good reason.

Are you seriously suggesting social services should investigate him because he tried to make some money selling a story to a paper?[/

No. Don't try putting words in my mouth. Didn't you read the start of my post where I said "it's not evidence of abuse"?

It's not reason to start to investigate him, but if social services have other information they may find it useful. How do we know whether the children needed the computer for schoolwork or not? We don't. How do we know whether jackchit's computer is unsafe for them to use or not? We don't. As I said, social services may find it useful, or they may not. But the possibility that they might means that it is worth mentioning.

 

[tonicblue]

I honestly don't care what you think about me, though if you attack me personally again I will report you - which would be ironic considering.

If any debunker stated that they believed God killed their ex-wife who had custody of their children so that they would be able to better fight against the 9/11 truth movement and raise their kids as such, I would also be worried about that.

Now, have you reported me yet as you said you would?

Or will you concede that I have a point?

And has somebody contacted the authorities yet, so that we can stop debating this here and let the people who make the decisions, make the decision?

I am sure you have heard people say much worse on the internet, I know I have.

This is simply your revenge for the altercations you had with Jackchit. It is totally despicable. I hope you report me and draw moderator attention to this thread.

I have gone one better than reporting this thread. Now, if I were you, I would go back to flaming.

 

[Mobyseven]

I am sure you have heard people say much worse on the internet, I know I have.

This is simply your revenge for the altercations you had with Jackchit. It is totally despicable. I hope you report me and draw moderator attention to this thread.

I have gone one better than reporting this thread. Now, if I were you, I would go back to flaming.

This is in no way 'revenge', as you would put it. This is not about my interests, or Jackchit. It is about a third party - his children. Unless you are employed as a liason officer by social services, I'd say now is the time for you to weigh out of this conversation. It is not your decision to make. It is theirs.

Your accusations of flaming will get you nowhere, by the way. As I'm sure others here will attest to, I am one of the active members here least likely to insult for no good reason.

Now, how exactly does out go, "one better than reporting this thread," hmm?

 

[chillzero]

Well then, hopefully the concerns of posters here are unfounded.

Someone please notify authorities soon about this if they haven't already been notified. The sooner the responsibility is passed to those who should be making the decisions the better.

Can I just point out that I am not advocating action in this case.

I am not endeared to this jackchit character from what I have read here, but I don't know him, and I don't know if anything posted by / about him is true.

My point was that I feel a public forum like this is completely the wrong place for this kind of discussion. Worst case scenario - those calling for social services involvement are correct, and the first thing we in the UK know about it is front page tabloid fodder about some maniac driving his kids off a cliff to protect them from the evil government forces that were being sent against him in his campaign to protect the world from 911 shills - which he found out about right here.

The information I see here makes me uncomfortable, but it could be wrong, it could be out of proportion, and it could be that he made the comments about his wife in some weird attempt to project a certain image of himself to his peers (fearless and worthy fighter for justice).

No one has the full story here - perhaps not even Jackchit, who may have a warped view of his wife's reasons for taking his children away. I would suggest we stop personal speculation about this, and if anyone sees fit to contact authorities, then do so, privately. If not, then just drop it.

 

[Mobyseven]

I agree with Chillzero about stopping this discussion. I am, however, not a citizen of the UK. I implore someone here to put this in the hands of the authorities.

 

[gumboot]

How do we know he even has a wife or children?

Well... he doesn't have a wife anymore obviously... but you get my point.

-Gumboot

 

[~enigma~]

The above quote is simply mind blowing.

Question for you...are you jackchit?

 

[Calcas]

Mobeyseven, I shouldn't laugh at your avatar but I do. LOL is right.

Also, do you have a link to the quote of Lyte's in your sig? Funny stuff.

 

[Mobyseven]

I've been thinking of changing the avatar recently, not sure to what though. My LC ban badge may be a placeholder for a little bit...

As for the Lyte Trip quote, I don't have the link myself, but I believe that if you check out either the top truther quotes for 2006, or the January Stundies, you'll find the link. It wasn't a recent one.

Again, thinking of changing that quote too.

 

[Calcas]

I've been thinking of changing the avatar recently, not sure to what though. My LC ban badge may be a placeholder for a little bit...

As for the Lyte Trip quote, I don't have the link myself, but I believe that if you check out either the top truther quotes for 2006, or the January Stundies, you'll find the link. It wasn't a recent one.

Again, thinking of changing that quote too.

Yeah, change is good once in awhile. One of my favorites from Lyte was, "My see-saw analogy makes any need for calculations moot." This, of course, was accompanied by his drawing of a see-saw.

 

[Rawkarma]

I really think I have said enough on this, but seeing as you have quoted me Tonic, I will reply. Know that I have no issue in you disagreeing with me, in fact I welcome debate here. Just try and keep it civil.

Originally Posted by Rawkarma
You are also negating the fact that if this is a man that is consumed in a world of imaginary conspiracies, then he is likely to be unemployed, or have a poor and broken work record; using some form of substance abuse and in general poor health.

The above quote is simply mind blowing.

Really? Interesting you should cherry pick that, out of all of what I and JC has allegedly said. Its just my opinion, and if you don't agree then that's fine. I think, even in light of how you seem very sensitive about it, calling that mind blowing is alil too fanciful. I may be wrong, and I have made no bones about it; however, it is my opinion that if someone spends most of their time in a world of nonexistent conspiracies, it will likely impact greatly on other facets of life. They may have a broken or poor work record. They are not spending much, if any time in reality. I did not say it is categorically so, I said imo is it likely.

Its also interesting to note that you don't find JC's comments (there is no more need to keep quoting him) mind blowing, you just jump in this thread and defend a fellow CTer, in spite of what he, allegedly said?

This is simply your revenge for the altercations you had with Jackchit. It is totally despicable. I hope you report me and draw moderator attention to this thread.

Wrong. As far as what I have said here, this is all in reply to what JC said on a public forum. If it's not JC, or it's BS, then I guess you can disregard all this. I have already stated that my OP was on the bases that what JC said was twoo. If it is then JC has some rather large issues, wouldn't you say?

On that note, and again, while I have no issues with you disagreeing with what I or anyone here has said, but where is your denunciation of what JC said, or do you agree with, if true, that which he said?

Also, before you reply with: "you're threatening to take his kids away blah blah" as one person in this thread has already made the mistake of doing, I have not, and have no intention of taking his kids away. I just believe JC, and to be honest anyone that is consumed with conspiracy nonsense to that degree, would not provide an environment for kids that I think is healthy.

I wouldn't want my kids brainwashed with that bs; the God killing his wife is a clear sign that, if true, JC is extremely unbalanced and irrational.

ETA: You are quoted as saying in this thread here:

Call me fussy, but I take what is said on internet forums with a large pinch of salt.

In light of your words in this thread, I find that kinda mind blowing.

 

[Mobyseven]

Rawkarma, I should probably point out that when tonicblue talks about 'altercations with Jackchit', he is talking to me.

I became one of the targets on Jackchit's MRGS site when it still existed.

 

[LashL]

Really?

At least no one here is making unfounded claims that jackchit actually killed his wife. I mean, he obviously had a motive (PNAC) and could have allowed it to happen by not maintaining the car properly (LIHOP) or even tampered with the breaks (MIHOP) but he has admitted to have benefitted from her death (Silverstein) and he now has custody of the children (Iraq)......

But then we have no evidence to suggest Jackchit was responsible. And we're not CTers.

See the difference?

Brilliant, that.

 

[tonicblue]

Rawkarma I just found it incredible that you connect people who are immersed in conspiracies with unemployment.

If you look at all the really hardcore theorists like Fetzer and A Jones and S Jones etc, they are all anything but unemployed or having a poor work history.

I agree that people who post constantly on internet forums are likely unemployed (eg killtown) but that isnt even necessarily true.