PS Audio Noise Harvester

I don't use a primitive form of communication as my native language. Where I come from we don't use 5 senses for communication, we use only 1. If we were talking in my language everyone in this thread would have already known the truth.

Are you serious? What sort of drugs do you use?
 
<snippage by TjW>

MP3 isn't properly done if people can hear the difference.


Almost every single tweak I have done makes a bigger difference than MP3 vs WAV. The tweaks properly show the information that is already there.



I don't do live concerts because the sound waves bounche all over the place.

You didn't answer my question.
 
Humans have two ears you know? Multichannel is for newbie audiophiles. True audiophiles eventually switch back to stereo, and then they switch to MP3 when their narrow-minded phobia is gone. Then after a few years of tweaking they switch back to WAV because their system needs it.

Oh, I forgot that we can't hear things behind us.
 
That corporate gibberish generator is spiffy!

We here at ExtremeSkeptic realize that it is better to streamline strategically than to unleash interactively. The interactive, front-end granular data hygiene factor can be summed up in one word: 60/60/24/7/365. Our technology takes the best features of Apache and CSS. If all of this seems confounding to you, that's because it is! We think that most killer web applications use far too much J2EE, and not enough RDF. We will embrace the term "customized". Without angel investors, you will lack schemas. We apply the proverb "He who hesitates is lost" not only to our returns-on-investment but our capability to incubate. We always seize B2C development. That is a terrific achievement when you consider this quarter's cycle! Think strategic. Think clicks-and-mortar. Think extensible. But don't think all three at the same time.
 
Good reading for showing Logical fallacy

http://www.theness.com/articles.asp?id=38

This is only a small segment from the above site,

Ad ignorantum
The argument from ignorance basically states that a specific belief is true because we don't know that it isn't true. Defenders of extrasensory perception, for example, will often overemphasize how much we do not know about the human brain. It is therefore possible, they argue, that the brain may be capable of transmitting signals at a distance.
UFO proponents are probably the most frequent violators of this fallacy. Almost all UFO eyewitness evidence is ultimately an argument from ignorance – lights or objects sighted in the sky are unknown, and therefore they are alien spacecraft.

Intelligent design is almost entirely based upon this fallacy. The core argument for intelligent design is that there are biological structures that have not been fully explained by evolutionary theory, therefore a powerful intelligent designer must have created them.


Confusing absence of evidence with evidence of absence
This fallacy cuts both ways. In other words, one might assume that absence of evidence is a compelling argument against the reality of a claim or phenomenon. On the other hand, however, one might dismiss the absence of evidence as having no significance – as not being evidence of absence.

In reality, the absence of evidence can only be properly considered in the context of how likely it is that evidence should exist. You must therefore consider how thoroughly evidence has been looked for, and if the tools and techniques employed are capable of finding evidence. For example, if you dredge the bottom of a sea with a net that has one inch holes in order to survey the life living in that sea, you will likely not come up with any creatures smaller than one inch in size. It would not be logical to then conclude that there are no fish smaller than one inch living in that sea.

This fallacy is central to the Bigfoot debate. Believers in Bigfoot claim that the absence of hard evidence of Bigfoot is not evidence that Bigfoot does not exist. Skeptics, however, argue that a population of large mammals living in North America should produce some evidence, such as the occasional corpse.


Paul

:) :) :)
 
Last edited:
But Paul. isn't ES using advanced skepticism to show how we, merely being ordinary skeptics, are just plain wrong? :D

Well this is a quote from him;

ExtremeSkeptic said:
Like I said before, I don't believe in anything, I don't trust anyone

Let us just take that to its logical conclusion, he doesn't trust himself, if you don't believe in anything, and be human is a thing, you don't believe in yourself, and you can't trust yourself. So all that playing with paper is done by someone he doesn't trust and can't believe in, so by default we win the argument that the paper is woo-woo and doesn’t work. And if that doesn’t make sense, well he doesn’t either.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Hey I was poking around and look what I came across:

Buzzing problems with dimmers
Each good dimmer has a filter choke inside. Those chokes help to filter out electrical noise that often causes hum to be picked up in sound system and musical instrument pick-ups. The slower the current rise is, the less noise is picked by sound system.
 
ES, you scare me. I find it hard to believe that it is possible to be this ignorant of basic facts.

Oh and BTW, if you wrap some ERS paper around your biceps I'm sure you'd be able to lift even more. Try it, you'll be surprised how well that works!
 
Somehow ES reminds me of something Adam Savage in the Mythbusters said: "I reject your reality and substitute my own".
 
Somehow ES reminds me of something Adam Savage in the Mythbusters said: "I reject your reality and substitute my own".
Skeptics here are 'Bullshlt!' and 'Mythbusters' wannabees. They want to do the same thing because they want to feel special, they want to be saviours, but they don't realize what they are doing is pointless because they lack the proper intelligence to do so. It's the same as a kid who watches Superman on TV and buys himself a suit because he thinks he can make a difference. People in this forum are the same, but they can't admit it.

MAT10163.jpg
 
We don't buy into his BS, and he shows only a great lack of knowledge and we are the ones a fault.

Paul

:) :) :)
 
Let me see if I can translate:
JREF forum members like to help people make fewer mistakes.
But we're too stupid to realize that it's pointless, other people cannot be helped.
And too egotistical to admit that no one can be helped.

I'm sorry, I have to disagree.
 
Let me see if I can translate:
JREF forum members like to help people make fewer mistakes.
But we're too stupid to realize that it's pointless, other people cannot be helped.
And too egotistical to admit that no one can be helped.

I'm sorry, I have to disagree.
Yes, there is no point in changing the truth to fit your own needs so you can live in an ignorant dream world. All possibilities already exist and will always exist. If an audiophile lives in placebo there is no point in converting him because someone else will just take his place. It's like in a ranking list in a sport, if you remove the #1 on the list what do you think will happen? You will keep going on forever until the sport is dead. You need to know the end result before you try to convert someone. Since there is no end in existence it's an eternal waste of time.

Skeptics only try to convert someone to make themselves happy, they are selfish.
Everyone are selfish; doing something for someone else only to feel better about yourself is still selfish. Nobody wants to do something that harms yourself, unless that makes you feel better later on...

I have entered the cave of the trolls to keep them busy with me instead of letting them out to harass the other people. That way they will have time to find the truth on their own instead of being forced by the evil trolls.
 

Back
Top Bottom