Stardust Hotel Imploded in Las Vegas

scooby said:
Maybe you've got some questions about it - you could contact the news organisation that filmed it, or maybe try and track down the person who stabilised the video?
Click to expand...
Not necessary. It was explained by NIST several years ago, and it isn't thermite. Do you know what's interesting about that floor?
 
PhantomWolf said:
Keep working on those insults scooby one day you might actually pass the level of annoying gnat.

I'm less than impressed you haven't bother trying to call me a government agent yet, I guess I'll have to just try harder for my points on that.

Still waiting for your demolision sounds on video. What's the matter, can't find one? Why not go and beg Dylan to find you one, cause so far you're proven yourself to have nothing of consquence except handwaving and piss poor insults a 3-year old could better.
Click to expand...

You sound like a 3 year old - why don't you give it a go 'twoofer'? :D
 
Still waiting for that video scooby having trouble finding it? How come, this is your big shot, just think, you could show this entire board that the WTC was demolished with one tiny link. Why are you stalling, posturing and throwing insults? How hard is it to find and post one little video with big booms in it? Surely you can find one, after all you have said that explosives were used, so it should be simple to show it.

Where the Kaboom?

Or are you just a dud?
 
scooby said:
Do you honestly think people are going to read this thread and conclude that you are anything else other than an *******?
Click to expand...

I've concluded that you are a coward. As for Phantomwolf, he is merely pressing home a point and you are crying like a baby about it.
 
Sorry, Scooby, but like Phantom Wolf, I have to request a video as well. You have posted a video of what is claimed to be a thermite reaction at one corner of one tower. I wish to see a video of more thermite reactions on both towers, as I believe a considerable amount of thermite was supposed to be used. Television cameras must have picked up more than one thermite reaction, surely?
 
Scooby,

I've been waiting a long time to see a WTC video with clear explosives going off.

Boom-boom-boom-boom! The noise of a demolition is unmistakable.

Surely you should have no trouble finding one. If there was a demolition on 9/11 that is...
 
You know you can never pin a kook CT.

He knows that we will eventually tire of asking him for some proof, then he will be back with a new conspiracy.

Or, he won't answer and instead say that we are all part of the conspiracy.

Old, tired schtick.
 
CHF said:
Scooby,

I've been waiting a long time to see a WTC video with clear explosives going off.

Boom-boom-boom-boom! The noise of a demolition is unmistakable.

Surely you should have no trouble finding one. If there was a demolition on 9/11 that is...
Click to expand...

I shouldn't have to be posting stuff like this, you really should be ashamed ...

The logical fallacy of false dilemma — also known as false choice, false dichotomy, falsified dilemma, fallacy of the excluded middle, black and white thinking, false correlative, either/or fallacy and bifurcation—involves a situation in which two alternative statements are held to be the only options, when in reality there exist one or more other options which have not been considered. The two alternatives presented are often, though not always, the two extreme points on some spectrum. Instead of such extreme simplification and wishful thinking, considering the whole spectrum, as in fuzzy logic, may be more appropriate. A typical false dilemma is the assertion "You are either for us or you are against us." The fallacy of this type of argument is that it tries to eliminate the middle ground.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_dilemma
 
CHF said:
Scooby,

I've been waiting a long time to see a WTC video with clear explosives going off.

Boom-boom-boom-boom! The noise of a demolition is unmistakable.

Surely you should have no trouble finding one. If there was a demolition on 9/11 that is...
Click to expand...

Or maybe it's one of these ... I'm not an expert in all the categories of woo, though of course this forum would be the place to learn more it seems ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Logical_fallacies
 
scooby said:
I shouldn't have to be posting stuff like this, you really should be ashamed ...
Click to expand...


It's not really a false dilemma fallacy...

You claim explosives were used. Explosives make noise. Videos exist of the buildings prior to, during, and after collapse, that captured sound. Therefore, for your claim to be true, some of these videos must have captured the explosions.

-Gumboot
 
I'm gonna be polite here, Scoob, and ask an honest question. I really want to know the answer. I want to know the Truth.

You say there were explosives. You also admit that explosives aren't silent. Every video of a real CD has loud bang sounds prior to the collapse initiation.

No videos of the WTC collapses do.

Why is that?
 
Hey Scooby, quit trying to spin out of the question put to you.

Answer it.

Then you can spin another 10 more asinine conspiracies.

But, you gotta answer the question first.

(oh, and you can't answer with another question, that is so kook like)


Notice the CT response? Change the subject, bring up logical fallacies, its all a way to dodge the question.
 
scooby said:
Maybe you've got some questions about it - you could contact the news organisation that filmed it, or maybe try and track down the person who stabilised the video?
Click to expand...
Scooby, you seem to have missed my last reply to this. You do know that NIST addressed this nearly 3 years ago, don't you? Do you know what the nature of the NIST explanation even was? Have you done any research at all on this, or was that video and Jone's thermite/ate explanation the first and only thing you ever heard or cared to hear about the matter?
 
scooby said:
I'm telling you they need to get shot of you, the ********ters on here are having a bad enough time as it is pretending to be James Randi, but an asshat like you in the mix is just dead weight I'm serious.
Click to expand...
Does this mean any second now we can expect a flow of facts, the likes we have never seen before, to blow the case sky high. Like Charlie Sheen you will challenge anyone to debate on the facts.

I am ready for you to set caps lock and bold, scooby! Please fill the forum with your intelligence!

...

What no facts! Darn we have been waiting, but everything you post has been debunked as lies well before you even posted it. Five years late, did they hold you back in K, or 1.

You may want to call your mother and tell her your education was a failure and there is serious doubt about you ever becoming a researcher.
 
Just a suggestoin, but maybe we should start a donation drive so we can offer a free pair of really tall boots to anyone who enters a thread that Scooby is posting in. Who's in?
 
There is as much evidence that the towers were weakened by gnawing hamsters as there is evidence of thermite.
Click to expand...

That may not be as silly as you think ;)

250px-Kitten-Kong.jpg
 
gumboot said:
It's not really a false dilemma fallacy...

You claim explosives were used. Explosives make noise. Videos exist of the buildings prior to, during, and after collapse, that captured sound. Therefore, for your claim to be true, some of these videos must have captured the explosions.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

What isn't, this post?
Or the other one you just posted describing a different false dilemma fallacy?
 
scooby said:
What isn't, this post?
Or the other one you just posted describing a different false dilemma fallacy?
Click to expand...
Scooby, are you aware that NIST addressed what you call "thermite" nearly 3 years ago? Are you aware of what their conclusions were?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom