• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

BBC and WTC 7 on 9/11: confusion or NWO-blunder?

The entire 400GB 911 tv archive at archive.org has now been removed. Could a debunker please explain that? Is it just more coincidences and errors?
 
parmanides said:
Hello all, some observations

At the very least, this demonstrates that the mainstream media repeat a sizable portion of their 'information' from official sources without ever questioning it - cue camera zooming in the building 7 actually still standing!! This proves that an act does not even need to be well orchestrated - it just needs well placed 'news' and people with a poor grasp of human psychology who will accept, or even righteously defend what the 'experts' have 'proved' to them (like most of the posters here)

oh and I keep hearing "but why would the NWO lizards leak their plans to everyone!!!!". Which is shorthand for:

- no leaking evidence means no conspiracy
- leaking of evidence would be logically inconsistent with a conspiracy

which is shorthand for " I don't have to question my own reality cos I ve got it all worked out"

George orwell would be proud of you all:)
Click to expand...

No, sorry mate, it means our Lizard overlords don't feel it necessary to issue information regarding the collapse of a 47 storey building in advance because they have confidence that the news media will notice the building collapsing when it actually happens.

Now, as for your closing comment, I think that applies perfectly to the mind-set of the average woowoo. They don't have to question their own reality because they can blame everything on a mysterious conspiracy.

Feeling inadequate? Well, you know who to blame.
 


CNN's Aaron Brown reporting at 4:15 EDT that WTC "is collapsing or has collapsed." However, he's much more cautious about the report, and somebody at CNN knows what 7 looks like (they've got a camera on the building already). Aaron actually turns around and from then on only refers to the building as being ready to collapse.

Proof positive that some confusion was going on that day, but 7's collapse was anticipated, which we all knew.

PS: Rob's been on the phone again!!!

http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/bbc_oops.mp3
 
Last edited:
parmanides said:
Hello all, some observations

At the very least, this demonstrates that the mainstream media repeat a sizable portion of their 'information' from official sources without ever questioning it - cue camera zooming in the building 7 actually still standing!! This proves that an act does not even need to be well orchestrated - it just needs well placed 'news' and people with a poor grasp of human psychology who will accept, or even righteously defend what the 'experts' have 'proved' to them (like most of the posters here)

oh and I keep hearing "but why would the NWO lizards leak their plans to everyone!!!!". Which is shorthand for:

- no leaking evidence means no conspiracy
- leaking of evidence would be logically inconsistent with a conspiracy

which is shorthand for " I don't have to question my own reality cos I ve got it all worked out"

George orwell would be proud of you all:)
Click to expand...

How do you know where the reported collapse news originated from? How do you know it wasn't a misinterpretation of the news that WTC 7 was about to collapse? The day was extremely busy, you don't triple check everything when reporting live, that causes mistakes.

The camera shows building 7 still standing. But did you know which building was number 7 (Salomon) before 9/11? Did the people in Britain know that? I didn't even know WTC had more than 2 buildings before 9/11.

Now, why would they leak a report like that, saying that building 7 collapsed before it actually collapsed? Wouldn't we see the collapse on TV anyway? Are the NWO full of idiots, releasing all the evidence in front of us?
 
Aphelion said:
No ideas eh, skeptics?
Click to expand...
I think this is the plan:
1) release incriminating evidence for no apparent reason
2) withdraw evidence in suspicious, attention-getting manner
3) start rubbing out people who saw the clips
 
Last edited:
PerryLogan said:
I think this is the plan:
1) release incriminating evidence for no apparent reason
2) withdraw evidence in suspicious manner
3) start rounding up Truthers who saw the clips
Click to expand...

How about a real answer, Perry? Why would they post 400GB of footage that they are allowed to publish then hurriedly remove it days later?

Why would google video keep removing the BBC clip, despite having thousands of videos with BBC footage that they leave alone?

Just asking questions, and demanding answers.
 
Aphelion said:
How about a real answer, Perry? Why would they post 400GB of footage that they are allowed to publish then hurriedly remove it days later?
[/quoute]

What did the owners of the site say when you asked them?

Aphelion said:
Why would google video keep removing the BBC clip, despite having thousands of videos with BBC footage that they leave alone?

...snip...
Click to expand...

What did Google say when you asked them?
Click to expand...
 
Aphelion said:
How about a real answer, Perry? Why would they post 400GB of footage that they are allowed to publish then hurriedly remove it days later?

Why would google video keep removing the BBC clip, despite having thousands of videos with BBC footage that they leave alone?

Just asking questions, and demanding answers.
Click to expand...

I'll be a sport and tell you what you want to hear:

Operatives here @JREF work round the clock in disappearing highly suspicious 9/11 videos and actually we've only just begun. 400 down, only 396,211 to go.

Lets get to work guys.....we can do this.
 
PerryLogan said:
Actually, I was giving your answers. And you rejected them.

Interesting.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

No, you weren't. You said all truthers that had seen them would be rounded up. I never said this. Why would you speak for me?

Now, could I have your answers please?
 
Aphelion said:
How about a real answer, Perry? Why would they post 400GB of footage that they are allowed to publish then hurriedly remove it days later?

Why would google video keep removing the BBC clip, despite having thousands of videos with BBC footage that they leave alone?

Just asking questions, and demanding answers.
Click to expand...

That's your problem. Your questions betray the fact that you're obviously suspicious from the get-go. There may be any number of innocuous reasons why. An impartial observer would just wait for more information before he started 'demanding answers'.

When there isn't enough information to come to an informed conclusion, skeptics patiently wait for further information and weed out the rumors and conjecture while it comes in. CT's "demand answers" to satisfy their suspicions and declare a conspiracy when an explanation isn't immediately forthcoming.

I guess it's just a different mindset. Not saying you're wrong, just observing.
 
Darat said:
How did you try to contact them?
Click to expand...

I emailed google yesterday when the video kept disappearing. I emailed archive.org early this morning when the archives started disappearing. I'm not holding my breath for a reply.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TruthSeeker1234 said:
The whole day was scripted for the newscasters. Including when the "planes" hit. Have you seen the Octupus videos that have the different news channels reading off the same script? That's good, but this one is great.
Click to expand...

Jamie Mcintryre, CNN correspondent (from www.911myths.com):

"From my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.
The only site, is the actual side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse."

Did CNN get a copy of the wrong script?

Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom