BBC and WTC 7 on 9/11: confusion or NWO-blunder?

[CHF]

Funniest thing ever.

Know what's even funnier?

The fact that you think reporting blunders are proof of an inside job.

Stop and THINK, TS. Think about what you're claiming and then tell me if you think it makes the least bit of sense.

 

[CHF]

The whole day was scripted for the newscasters. Including when the "planes" hit. Have you seen the Octupus videos that have the different news channels reading off the same script? That's good, but this one is great.

So let's tally this up....

So in addition to the actual plotters (bomb planters, plane controllers etc) every structural engineer is in on this...and now the entire media as well. Only problem is that the conspirators didn't propely brief the media on their role, resulting in screw-ups like the BBC one.

Pretty sad that such a pathetic, massive, blundering conspiracy is the only way for you to make this thing work.

 

[LashL]

No, stop it, you're killing me.

There was nothing wrong with the BBC report.There were no mistakes, no false information, no blunders, no gaffes. It was all perfectly correct. If not for the tiny little detail that they forgot to wait until the building acually came down, it would have been fine.

The whole day was scripted for the newscasters. Including when the "planes" hit. Have you seen the Octupus videos that have the different news channels reading off the same script? That's good, but this one is great.

In that case, since this is splitting your sides, perhaps when you stop laughing, you'll do something constructive with this incredible evidence of yours. I mean, come on, you've got what you consider to be riveting and compelling evidence of involvement in mass murder! Nearly 3000 dead and you're laughing when you manage to find a five year old video that "proves" to you the complicity of the BBC and the other co-conspirators?

What on earth are you laughing about? Shouldn't you be doing something constructive with this evidence that you believe to be compelling? Certainly, if I believed that I had compelling evidence of complicity in mass murder, the last thing I'd be doing is laughing and posting on an internet forum.

So, stop your chuckling, rally your troofers, and storm the castles already if you believe the nonsense you post.

ETA: At the very least, take your compelling evidence to the authorities if you're having an off day and don't feel like storming the castles today.

 

[gumboot]

The whole day was scripted for the newscasters. Including when the "planes" hit. Have you seen the Octupus videos that have the different news channels reading off the same script? That's good, but this one is great.

The only similarity is that they both make the suggestion that the attacks are a terrorist attack.

Once UA175 hit WTC2, you would have to have severe brain damage to not conclude that it's a terrorist attack.

It's not reading off a script. It's called common sense.

-Gumboot

 

[Brainache]

ROTFLMFAO. My cheeks hurt from laughing so hard at all your OCT attempts to spin this. You all keep saying "The BBC made a mistake". No they didn't. They got it right! They just got it right about 20 minutes too early!

Funniest thing ever.

"The Solomon Bros. building has collapsed" as she turns and reveals . . . the Solomon Bros. building.

It's hard to type I'm laughing so hard. My sides hurt. Tears.

Keep going Gravy. Where's RMackey? AntiSpohist? What say you?
Pomeroo? Please.

Oh my.

Well speaking as someone who spent 16 years working in TV news, on the studio floor, in the control room and the News room, I can tell you that a day like 9/11 was would have been pretty damn chaotic behind the scenes. If this was the only thing misreported that day I would be very surprised.

The most obvious solution has already been pointed out many times in this thread, ie: A report about building seven's immanent collapse was somehow garbled in all the other reports of what was happening and someone thought it meant that seven had already collapsed.

Truthers seem to have no problem disregarding main stream media when it disagrees with their pet theories, but if someone at the BBC or where ever gets something wrong, suddenly we have to accept that they should be infallible.

Let's also not forget that this was six or seven hours into an ongoing live coverage of events and Journalists being what they are, they like to keep the story moving along. You can only fill airtime with experts speculating about who is responsible for so long.
Eventually the situation demands fresh news. Someone gets a statement from a spokesman saying: "Building Seven is about to fall down so we have evacuated all our people".
Reporter phones producer:" Boss the spokesman said seven is about to fall down"
"When?"
"Not sure, but pretty soon, they evacuated everyone"
Producer types script: "Building Seven has collapsed" waits until terrorism expert gets boring and figures it's a safe bet that seven has collapsed, pushes the earpiece button and says: "Building seven has collapsed, throw to reporter in NY"

The above is of course speculation, but it seems a lot more likely to me than the BBC getting a press release about a secret demolition and reading it twenty minutes early. Truthers never seem to consider that people don't always know what is going on, they forget that they are looking in hindsight at chaotic events.

 

[David Wong]

Okay.

Ace, imagine this reporter. This BBC reporter, working there before the conspirators came to power. Somebody from the NWO sits down with this reporter and says, "Look, Bush is going to murder 3,000 Americans so that he can cause millions of others to die in World War 3 against Islam. We're going to need you to go along with it. Okay?"

And this non-American, non-Neocon reporter says, "Sure! Give me my script!"

Insanity. Utter insanity.

Though you have to admit, this video is such a devastating blow to those who say the conspiracy could have been carried out by a couple dozen people. Right?

Rooting for this video is, at the same time, jumping fully into the old thousands-strong conspiracy, made up almost entirely of people who were in their jobs before the conspiracy started and thus had to be convinced to go along, exactly 100% of whom did because none have come forward. I mean, not only is it the FDNY, the federal government, the city government, the state government, volunteers, cops, every engineer in the world, the vast majority of academia in the world, every American news TV station, radio station, newspaper, news website... but it's the freaking BBC, too. So now we've stretched into foreign news agencies.

Tens of thousands - no - HUNDREDS of thousands in the conspiracy, if this video is right. All operating in PERFECT unison, with 100% compliance, with 0 defectors, 0 changed minds, 0 leaks, 0 mistakes. Except this one.

Okay.

 

[maccy]

The only similarity is that they both make the suggestion that the attacks are a terrorist attack.

Once UA175 hit WTC2, you would have to have severe brain damage to not conclude that it's a terrorist attack.

It's not reading off a script. It's called common sense.

-Gumboot

Ace is a no-planer as well as a space-beamer. That's why he was quoting the octopus film*. Thats why it had to be scripted - every media outlet that was reporting was running fake CGI'd footage with evil faces in the smoke.

The eyewitnesses were all retroactively convinced by the news footage, or something.

I don't see the point of arguing with Ace Baker any more - he's laughably pathetic. I wonder what his state of mind will be, five years down the line.

*the whole film is here:

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.

I AGREE

if you do a search for "octopus 911" on YouTube you can find excerpts. It's pretty sickening stuff, though.

 

[hellaeon]

No, stop it, you're killing me.

There was nothing wrong with the BBC report.There were no mistakes, no false information, no blunders, no gaffes. It was all perfectly correct. If not for the tiny little detail that they forgot to wait until the building acually came down, it would have been fine.

The whole day was scripted for the newscasters. Including when the "planes" hit. Have you seen the Octupus videos that have the different news channels reading off the same script? That's good, but this one is great.

So one minute the MSM is bad and not to be trusted, but now of course its the ultimate source of the truth!

Are you so hilariously dense that you fully believe this super secret evil cabal somehow forgot to cover its tracks 5 years later? But even better, involved a heap of personnel from a tv network? Yet somehow as they watched and laughed all sinister and evil, they failed to realise the false report they just created was being read too early? Took them 20 minutes to notice?

hahahaha Look in the mirror if you want a good laugh. Your embarressing to musicians Ace.

I think it should be compulsory that idiots who think this kind of childish level should be conscripted.

 

[apathoid]

No, stop it, you're killing me.

There was nothing wrong with the BBC report.There were no mistakes, no false information, no blunders, no gaffes. It was all perfectly correct. If not for the tiny little detail that they forgot to wait until the building acually came down, it would have been fine.

You just contradicted yourself. It wasn't a mistake, they just aired the report too soon, thus foiling the plot.

I realize you are completely immune to anything resembling logic and reason, but I'd like to hear your take on why it was even necessary to alert news agencies of the collpase. Surely they would've reported it's collapse anyway, no? Even if they didn't report on it, so what? Why make the plot unnecessarily complex, adding yet another layer of people who actually dont serve a useful purpose in the conspiracy, any of whom who could blow the lid off the whole thing?

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

This is sheer lunacy.

The fact that the BBC messed up by not knowing which buildings were which and erroneously reported the collapse of a building that was actually physically visible in the background at the time they reported it to have collapsed, is somehow evidence to troofers of a furtherance of the conspiracy that they believe in but have never been able to articulate?

No, the reports were not erroneous. They were premature, and perfectly accurate.

 

[hellaeon]

oh man, another no planer. Wow. This is proof that creationism is crap. As if a powerful god could design people so seemingly dumb.

Ace, you believe in space beams and no planes as if it were fact? If so good luck to you in your future endeavours.

I can only think that you seriously need to get laid. Multiple times.

 

[hellaeon]

Okay.

Ace, imagine this reporter. This BBC reporter, working there before the conspirators came to power. Somebody from the NWO sits down with this reporter and says, "Look, Bush is going to murder 3,000 Americans so that he can cause millions of others to die in World War 3 against Islam. We're going to need you to go along with it. Okay?"

And this non-American, non-Neocon reporter says, "Sure! Give me my script!"

Insanity. Utter insanity.

Though you have to admit, this video is such a devastating blow to those who say the conspiracy could have been carried out by a couple dozen people. Right?

Rooting for this video is, at the same time, jumping fully into the old thousands-strong conspiracy, made up almost entirely of people who were in their jobs before the conspiracy started and thus had to be convinced to go along, exactly 100% of whom did because none have come forward. I mean, not only is it the FDNY, the federal government, the city government, the state government, volunteers, cops, every engineer in the world, the vast majority of academia in the world, every American news TV station, radio station, newspaper, news website... but it's the freaking BBC, too. So now we've stretched into foreign news agencies.

Tens of thousands - no - HUNDREDS of thousands in the conspiracy, if this video is right. All operating in PERFECT unison, with 100% compliance, with 0 defectors, 0 changed minds, 0 leaks, 0 mistakes. Except this one.

Okay.

You know thinking that stupid for long enough im sure would onset a stroke of some sort. Imagine living with this kind of mentality every day. Then again, you would get used to the nurses, medicine and walls around you quick enough.

 

[Brainache]

No, the reports were not erroneous. They were premature, and perfectly accurate.

So what are you saying? The BBC have a time machine? Psychic Journalists? Was it like "Minority Report"?

Or that someone in the evil conspiracy let them in on it and they have stayed quiet since?

Oh and BTW can I get my money back for that Barbie movie my daughter made me buy? It sucks.

 

[CHF]

A no-planer and a laser beamer?

TS - you're what most twoofers call a "disinfo agent."

In other words, you're such a kook that most kooks think you're too kooky to be a real kook.

That takes a special kind of idiocy.

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

You just contradicted yourself. It wasn't a mistake, they just aired the report too soon, thus foiling the plot.

I realize you are completely immune to anything resembling logic and reason, but I'd like to hear your take on why it was even necessary to alert new agencies of the collpase. Surely they would've reported it's collapse anyway, no? Even if they didn't report on it, so what? Why make the plot unnecessarily complex, adding yet another layer of people who actually dont serve a useful purpose in the conspiracy, any of whom who could blow the lid off the whole thing.

It was essential to spread the disinfo "official story" as fast and as far and as often as possible. People at ground zero spoke of "explosions". That was quickly replaced with the official meme "collapse". "Terrorism" and "Osama bin Laden" were injected within 5 seconds of the second "plane" strike. The whole thing was scripted and with good reason.

They didn't want to take any chances on reporters actually discovering things like WTC7 being demolished. No. No. No. Can't have any of that. They had "witnesses" on the streets. They had press releases ready to go. The whole story was in the can. That is nothing new for the government. They script stories for the media all the time. It is standard operating procedure. The media report everything the government tells them to, every day. Watch the news.

 

[Dr Adequate]

The BBC received a press release or notification.

Dear BBC,

I'm going to use the office of President to commit mass murder and treason, and I want to ask you a teensy favor. As you'll see from the enclosed timetable, WTC7 is scheduled to collapse at 4:57 pm, and that's when we'd like you to report it happening.

Your pal,

George W. Bush.

PS: Donald just explained to me that you'd probably report the collapse of a tower anyway, even without me telling you about it in advance, 'cos collapsing towers are kinda newsworthy. I guess either way's good.

I enclose a press presentation pack giving full details of our false flag operation; a special 9/11 souvenir key-ring in the shape of a bloodstained hand; and a T-shirt with the slogan "I Could Have Saved Thousands Of Lives But All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt".

 

[Dog Town]

While all of that is true, I think that Dylan's interest in promoting this is so he can strike back at the recent BBC documentary that showed him picking at his scabs while the interviewer explained what a simile is.

Sadly... he still does not get it!

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

So what are you saying? The BBC have a time machine? Psychic Journalists? Was it like "Minority Report"?

I think you have two choices.

1. The BBC news people are psychic, and deserving of the JREF million dollar prize.

2. They were fed a press release from "official sources" that said that the Sololman bros. building had collapsed because of structural damage and fire.

 

[gumboot]

I think I see now what Ace is saying here..

Apparantly the BBC article was perfectly accurate and correct...

Aside from the minor detail that it was wrong...

Unfathomable.

-Gumboot

 

[Totovader]

It was essential to spread the disinfo "official story" as fast and as far and as often as possible. People at ground zero spoke of "explosions". That was quickly replaced with the official meme "collapse". "Terrorism" and "Osama bin Laden" were injected within 5 seconds of the second "plane" strike. The whole thing was scripted and with good reason.

They didn't want to take any chances on reporters actually discovering things like WTC7 being demolished. No. No. No. Can't have any of that. They had "witnesses" on the streets. They had press releases ready to go. The whole story was in the can. That is nothing new for the government. They script stories for the media all the time. It is standard operating procedure. The media report everything the government tells them to, every day. Watch the news.

Holy Jesus.

Ok- so according to you, who was not involved in this conspiracy?

Are you the only one?