• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

BBC and WTC 7 on 9/11: confusion or NWO-blunder?

CHF said:
So they demolished WTC7 via controlled demolition and it wasn't part of an inside job? And the FDNY wasn't in on it?

I sure love watching twoofers stumbling over themselves trying to argue CD of WTC7 without implicating the FDNY.

It's both hilarious and pathetic.
Click to expand...


It's far funnier watching you trying to explain away this BBC video.
 
Aphelion said:
No im suggesting they were told that 7 was being taken down so that they could continue rescue efforts.
Click to expand...

So they blew up an empty building in order to make rescue efforts easier....and they then covered it up? And the FDNY is keeping quiet?

Well you must see the problem with that. If WTC7 was taken down cuz it was unstable and they wanted to prevent more deaths....well there'd be no reason to cover that up, would there?
 
Aphelion said:
No im suggesting they were told that 7 was being taken down so that they could continue rescue efforts.
Click to expand...


Some basic questions:

1) Why did the FDNY lie about it then?
2) Who demolished it?
3) When were charges laid?
4) FDNY were conducting rescue operations and had to cease them to evac the area due to WTC7 collapse, thus WTC7 collapse hindered rescue efforts.
5) Under whose authority was the building demolished?
6) How did the intact not-about-to-collapse WTC7 hinder rescue operations such that it had to be demolished?

-Gumboot
 
wtc7 still standing was hindering resue efforts. Perhaps thats why they needed to get rid of it.
 
Aphelion said:
It's far funnier watching you trying to explain away this BBC video.
Click to expand...

Two options

1) the conspirators told the media WTC7 was going to come down and the BBC read the memo too soon.

2) the media heard that WTC7 was going to come down (since the FDNY had been saying so for hours) and the BBC goofed in the midst of confusion and said it came down before it did.

The BBC wasn't the only network who knew WTC7 would fall.

MSNBC Newsman Brian Williams: What we’ve been fearing all afternoon has apparently happened. We’ve been watching number seven World Trade, which was part of the ancillary damage of the explosion and collapse of the other two.

So which is it?

1 or 2?
 
Aphelion said:
Oh so you are starting to believe it was demolished?
Click to expand...

No. The point is: if it matters that it was demolished, then it matters that the FDNY covered it up.

Are you interested in having a real discussion or do you want to resort to sophistry and point scoring?
 
gumboot said:
How was it hindering rescue efforts?

-Gumboot
Click to expand...


Do you really not know the answer to that question?

All the firefighters on the pile had to withdraw because of the collapse danger. If wtc7 had stayed standing longer they couldnt go back on the pile to rescue people.
 
Aphelion said:
No im suggesting they were told that 7 was being taken down so that they could continue rescue efforts.
Click to expand...

Search and rescue efforts had to be abandoned to clear the area around WTC 7.

Are you suggesting that they would bring WTC 7 down on possible survivors?
 
MerryMelodies said:
Transit readings don't translate into a forecast of high speed, symmetrical, complete building collapses.
Click to expand...


Conduct this experiment.
Get a yard or meter length of masons line or any similar string. Attach a fishing weight or similar weighted object to one end of it. Hold the loose end in your finger tips. Note the direction the weight on the other end of the string points to. Write this down. This is the direction gravity is pulling. Go back to your notes and compare your findings to the direction WTC7 fell.. Any questions?
 
Aphelion said:
Do you really not know the answer to that question?

All the firefighters on the pile had to withdraw because of the collapse danger. If wtc7 had stayed standing longer they couldnt go back on the pile to rescue people.
Click to expand...

Everyone would have understood such a demolition.

SO WHY COVER IT UP?
 
Aphelion said:
Do you really not know the answer to that question?

All the firefighters on the pile had to withdraw because of the collapse danger. If wtc7 had stayed standing longer they couldnt go back on the pile to rescue people.
Click to expand...

So instead they sent a demolition team in?

Or the building was pre-wired with explosives and detonators which survived the fires? Where were the detonation cords run to?

Why keep it a secret? Why let NIST waste money investigating it?

Why do NIST say there's no evidence of explosives?
 
Aphelion said:
Do you really not know the answer to that question?

All the firefighters on the pile had to withdraw because of the collapse danger. If wtc7 had stayed standing longer they couldnt go back on the pile to rescue people.
Click to expand...


Okay we'll let this one go for now. I still have some questions that need answering:

1) Who decided the building would be demolished?
2) Who did the demolition?
3) When?
4) Why did the FDNY lie about the matter at hand?

-Gumboot
 
So basically....

1) WTC7 was demolished via CD
2) this was done to help rescue efforts
3) the FDNY knew about this
4) the FDNY is keeping quiet
5) the FDNY is not part of any coverup

That about cover it, Aphelion?
 
I'm going to suggest we leave this discussion to Gumboot and Aphelion. The rest of us are saying variations on the same thing, anyway.
 
maccy said:
I'm going to suggest we leave this discussion to Gumboot and Aphelion. The rest of us are saying variations on the same thing, anyway.
Click to expand...

I think this one's just about done anyway.

Like all twoofers trying to make the case of WTC7's demolition and the FDNY's innocence at the same time, Alphelion has tied himself into quite a logical knot.
 
The "cat is out of the bag" fantasy

We're already tired of it--but of course the Truthers are terribly excited by this latest smoking gun. They are living out the latest incarnation of the "cat is out of the bag" fantasy.

On his cable TV show today, Alex talked about the BBC tapes with the "Loose Change" guys. Everyone was full of excitement, and they all agreed this spectacular blunder by the BBC was going to wake everyone up (again). The cat is out of the bag, and soon everyone will stop laughing and tell these guys they were right all along. The Truthers just can't see that they're repeating the same fantasies over and over again.
 
Last edited:
I am curious as to why these videos are being pulled from Google and Youtube. It only lends legitimacy to the truthers who say this is a cover-up. Why is Google and Youtube pulling the flicks???
 
Interesting...

1. WTC7 is now allegedly taken down under the premise of helping rescue efforts.

Ok, so if that was the case, as people have asked...why would anyone cover that up?

If that were the case, I do not think NIST would have wasted their time investigating how WTC7 collapsed, as i am sure someone would have informed them that it was taken down intentionally to help rescue efforts...

ok this suggestion has to go down as one of the stupidest in truther history.

TAM:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom