e-dog said:well, IF space is habited and if the moon is also habited.
What rights do we have to put weapons in orbit?
Bush is 1 crazy mutherF*cker.
if we'd get into a fight with ET's they'd most likely be much more advanced.
It'd be like Spacedust VS a 50 Megaton (Equilivant power to: 50 Million tons of TNT) Nuke
Edit: Changed "habited" to "inhabited", Thanx Obviousman.
IT--
LC said:There are real conspiracies involving the moon and nasa in general, but they have more to do with trying to hide the existence of UFOs and ETs.
We went to the moon.
Someone was already there.
There are bases on the moon.
Those bases were not built by humans.
We were told not to return, which is why we didn't return.
I like the fact that there is a counter-conspiracy-theory over there:
I guess he's the equivalent of a 9/11 no-planer. he's the Judy Wood of moon hoaxes.
d:Amazing. From that thread, I learned:
#President Bush wants to presumably wage war against the aliens on the moon so he can take their bases (all of which are belong to us, I suppose)
#There are WMDs in orbit, including nukes, bioweapons, and "maybe" even lasers.
#But not really, although there is a single handgun in orbit.d:
#And anyway, according to Killtown, "very obvious" strings were used to hoax the moon landings. Cue Frank Zappa's "Cheepnis" at this point.
#The Japanese are going to blow the whole hoax wiiiiide open, bayyybeeee.
#The US and USSR were not enemies. Kruschev was apparently faking it.
#The Van Allen radiation belt would cook astronauts.
#The moon has "full gravity" (??) and a dense atmosphere. Coincidentally, the LC forum also has a "dense atmosphere".
Yay!
It's all so clear now. Kennedy is blackmailed by the elder Bush into going to the moon, supposedly for "exploration." Behind the scenes, Bush is actually allied with the Mooninites, and conspires with them to assassinate Kennedy once the Apollo program is in place. During the Apollo mission, critical defense secretes were divulged to the Mooninites, and they began working on a plan to enslave the humans. The plan was to mature in about 40 years. Fast forward to today. With the plan of world-domination now in place, Bush's son needs only send a "false flag" moon mission that will supposedly enrage the Mooninites, prompting their attack. Under the pretense that we were in the wrong by invading the world, and aided by the Patriot Act, Bush is set to push through legislation that will ultimately render the Earth incompetent in protecting itself from the oncoming Mooninite attack.Aha! It was those crafty Moonies that built the WTC destroying Death Star!
I cant wait for Bush to declare the War On Luna.
Amazing. From that thread, I learned:
#President Bush wants to presumably wage war against the aliens on the moon so he can take their bases (all of which are belong to us, I suppose)
#There are WMDs in orbit, including nukes, bioweapons, and "maybe" even lasers.
#But not really, although there is a single handgun in orbit.d:
#And anyway, according to Killtown, "very obvious" strings were used to hoax the moon landings. Cue Frank Zappa's "Cheepnis" at this point.
#The Japanese are going to blow the whole hoax wiiiiide open, bayyybeeee.
#The US and USSR were not enemies. Kruschev was apparently faking it.
#The Van Allen radiation belt would cook astronauts.
#The moon has "full gravity" (??) and a dense atmosphere. Coincidentally, the LC forum also has a "dense atmosphere".
Yay!
bolding mine.A second profound policy question concerns the designation by the U.S. military of visiting extraterrestrials as an 'enemy'. According to Hellyer, this had led to the development of "laser and particle guns to the point that they can be used against the visitors from space." It is this targeting of visiting extraterrestrials that concerns Hellyer, and he asks "is it wise to spend so much time and money to build weapon systems to rid the skies of alien visitors?" Hellyer poignantly raises the key policy question: "Are they really enemies or merely legitimate explorers from afar?" Hellyer's question raises profound importance in understanding the relationship between visiting extraterrestrial civilizations and world peace.
The third policy question arose from the recent decision by President Bush to build a base on the moon. Hellyer believes this is the activation of a plan first launched by Col Corso's mentor, Lt General Arthur Trudeau to build a base from which visiting extraterrestrials could be monitored and possibly targeted as they approach the Earth. Hellyer outlined his opposition to the weaponization of space, something that the liberal government of Canada is currently opposed to. The weaponization of space remains a key policy issue clearly has profound policy issues from the perspective of extraterrestrial visitors to Earth.
Aha! It was those crafty Moonies that built the WTC destroying Death Star!
I cant wait for Bush to declare the War On Luna.
Ah, I can see where this is going: The Bush administration (or their NWO/Zionist handlers) will soon fake an alien attack on the U.S., to drum up support for an invasion of the moon and commence some serious alien butt-kicking.
That's probably the most insane thing I've ever written. What's the over/under for the number of days it'll take before some CT nutter seriously proposes something like this?
I see a few traces of the writings of Richard Hoagland mixed into the lines of reasoning.
About ten minutes after one of them reads "Starship Troopers"
-Gumboot