Part of Glickman's review: The final portion of the evening (rapidly becoming morning) is question and answer time. Hoagland tells us to “look for a new paper” to be put on the web site which deals with - as I understood him to say - the hyperdimensional physics ala Maxwell and his QUATERNIONS. Richard spends a good deal of time discussing Maxwell, in 1873, and how his work was edited by a guy named Hebicide(?) He speaks of a solar angular momentum deficit which can be made up for by hypothetical planets; he shows a graph of ‘luminosity’ vs. ‘angular momentum’, their linear relationship, and that the sun is off the line. The sun, he says, is at a deficit by two orders of magnitude and we need two planets, very far away, to compensate. He says that 4-D physics can account for this, but not 3-D physics. He acknowledges that he and Van Flandern don’t see eye to eye on some things, but insists that the *current* location/orientation of the Face (post pole shift) “is not an accident.” (I want to see how they are both right.) Richard holds up four vials of T-Rex “stuff” having arrived by Fed Ex. He says that if there’s a hyper-d physics, then radioactive signatures will create specific isotope transformations and imprint a signature in the sediments. It will be tested. He speaks of the hyper-d energy as “the energy of the vacuum.” SO, to those with mathematical interest in Hoagland’s hyper-d claims, I guess you and the rest of us should all be on the lookout for the new paper he said he would put on the web, probably within a couple of weeks. I know you’ve heard things like this before. At the late hour during which I was trying to take notes, that’s the best I can provide regarding hyper-d physics from the seminar.
Nice and simple.
