Creeps Crack, Gravy Gloats

IronSnot said:
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.
Click to expand...

You weren't asked to watch it again. You were asked WHY you think Gravy 'lost'. Most people with rational opinions actually know WHY the come to those opinions, don't you think?
 
Lying Liars and the Lies They Tell

[=IronSnot;2344744]pomeroo, it was the allegory you used. Quite obvious what you meant (ie you lost - get over it).

But I am not going to watch that pile of poo again. Under no circumstances.

edit - I think it was in Dylan's video of the event.
Click to expand...


Aww, Snotty, you disappoint me. I thought I had discovered a genuine eyes-rolling, mouth-foaming delusional lunatic. You're just a liar. C'mon, 'fess up: You never even watched Mark's demolition of the Boys. Tell the truth, now.

Oh, about my "allegory"--it seems to have slipped my mind. What was it again? Show us where I admit to knowing that the jihadist attacks were an inside job. You don't want to be exposed as a fraud, do you? I'm afraid if you continue running away from your false claims, we're just not going believe anything you say. You know how important credibility is to conspiracy liars.
 
twinstead said:
You weren't asked to watch it again. You were asked WHY you think Gravy 'lost'. Most people with rational opinions actually know WHY the come to those opinions, don't you think?
Click to expand...
That's where you went wrong, twinstead. Most people with emotional opinions base their opinions on preconception, charisma, and speciousness. They think there must be a good reason for their opinions, but they suspect that if they were to scrutinize their opinions for a rational basis it would challenge their preconceptions, and so they "can't be bothered."
 
IronSnot said:
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.
Click to expand...

Wait, wait, wait - so you can't even remember why you think Bermas won?

Show us one thing that Gravy got wrong and one thing that Bermas got right.

Simple.

What is it with you "truth seekers" and avoiding the truth?

I mean, come on dude. It's a simple request. You can't just spout your mouth (fingers?) off here and not expect someone to ask you to back yourself up.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.
Click to expand...
Please explain what your have formed your opinion from. Because, honestly dude, a lot of people disagree with you on this one. Even the kids at LC were pretty damn disappointed after they got served by Gravy.

Sorry buddy, but "I couldn't be bothered" doesn't cut it around here. Back yourself up or withdraw your statement.
 
Last edited:
protestwbe2.jpg


Damned, we really need a "Splitter-Award"...

popc%5B1%5D.gif
 
That's why the "truth movement" will never get anywhere.
They're too busy accusing each other of being infiltrators when they dissagree with eachother's pet theories.

Paranoia is a beautiful thing.
 
IronSnot said:
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.
Click to expand...

I have a very simple question, that doesn't require you to watch it again. Did you watch the whole thing at least once?
 
The Doc said:
You can't just spout your mouth (fingers?) off here and not expect someone to ask you to back yourself up.
Click to expand...

I so like the imagery of someone "spouting their fingers off", I am going to steal it.

I will also add "go wash your fingers off" (for when someone types something rude), "do you email you mother with those fingers?" (ditto), "foaming at the cuticles" (to describe someone who's a bit bonkers), "straight from the horse's hoof" (for first-hand information), and "Loose nails tell tales" (if someone accidentally lets something slip).
 
IronSnot said:
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.
Click to expand...

Well done Ironsnot for presenting a thoroughly thought provoking argument.

Maybe with your next gem you could actually post a fact or too, but other than that you did remarkably well.
 
Hmmmm. Thats quite strange. Apparently ironsnot knows more about pomero's views on 9/11 than pomero himself. That is exactly like going up to Gravy and saying "Nuh uh! You believe 9/11 was an inside job!" Snot, please point out the specific part of the interview that led your conclusions.
 
Loss Leader said:
The psychological makeup necessary to be a tr00ther precludes cooperation.
Click to expand...
You may have a point. However my alternative hypothesis is that they are engaged in a extended form of performance art which pays homage to Monty Python's Flying Circus.
Consider some of the facts -
  • Truther after truther turns up here and does a creditable impression of the Black Knight from Holy Grail.
  • What is the LTW crew if not The Gumbies Doing a Documentary?
  • Now the CTs are giving us their version of this scene from Life of Brian.
I rest my case - I'll leave it to others to identify further Python references ...
 
Last edited:
IronSnot said:
Sorry, can't be bothered watching it again.

My opinion, and I've said it here before, is that Bermas won, Gravy came a distant and petulant second, Dylan came a very quiet third and the host, whoever he was (on edit - ahh it's Pomeroo), won't be filling in for Letterman anytime soon.
Click to expand...

That's an astoundingly poor rebuttal. You know Bermas won, but you can't be bothered to tell anyone why you think that or where Bermas' strongest point was made.
 
My daughter is a senior in a large High school and is a member of their "mock trial" team. Their team went to the Pennsylvania state finals last year and came in 2nd place so they're pretty smart kids. We live in a pretty affluant area which I would classify as more liberal than conservative.

Of course, all of her team had taken at least one debate class and were familiar with the mechanics and techniques of a successful, and non-successful debate.

She had watched this debate with me when it first came out and I was surprised when she asked me if she could show it to her mock trial team. She said her teacher was somewhat of an "inside jobber" and had asked him if she could show it STRICTLY FROM A DEBATE STANDPOINT. Of course, he was delighted. She arranged for the class to vote afterwards on which side "won" the debate based strictly on the mechanics of debate they had had been taught.

Long story short. 16 students watched, and voted on the debate.

The vote was 15-1 in favor of Gravy/Ron. She said the one dissenting vote explained that he was convinced that 911 was an inside job and no amount of "disinfo" (HIS WORDS!) would convince him otherwise.

Here's the best part. She asked everyone later what their thoughts were on 911 before they viewed the debate. Eight of them had a preconceived idea that the Government "probably" had something to do with it. ALL eight of them said after watching the debate, if that's the best evidence for a conspiracy, then it's probably not true.
 
Great news Calcas!

I got my friend - who hadn't even thought about it (911 conspiracy), had just heard about it and I got him to watch the debate and he said pretty much all the same things WE said regarding Dylan and Bermas - "Is the bloke with the glasses frozen?", and when Dylan debunked Bermass "Who's side is he on?! he has to be the worst guy to take to a debate ever!"

The vote was 15-1 in favor of Gravy/Ron.
Click to expand...

so much for 36% and 84% :D
 
Gravy, are you sure that pizza wasn't in the trunk of a car on the way to a New Jersey pier and some freshly mixed cement?


Yo! You can pin nuthin on me! I got an alibi!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom