432 shows harmony of Sun, Moon, Earth Design

The atmosphere is too polluting, so I must change venues so that if any want to discuss honestly for progress sake and to make connections, we will have a place. I shall find one, maybe an old forum...... that's still opne. I have four of them as I went to newsgroups rather than discussion boards..

Got to fly..

Back tommorrow, as I will give you a chance to muster up some courage and establish some principles and rules of conduct in your hearts.

Newsgroups? Usenet, eh? alt.kooks is just for you. You should also post to sci.skeptic. The crowd of atheists there are mild folks compared to the bad-assed ones here. Say hello to HAMMOND, he has a PROOF of GOD I'm sure you will find interesting. And Dr. CONRAD can explain to you that MAN is OLDER than COAL. You'll have lots of friends. Be sure to ask how Earl Curley is doing. :covereyes
 
Newsgroups? Usenet, eh? alt.kooks is just for you. You should also post to sci.skeptic. The crowd of atheists there are mild folks compared to the bad-assed ones here. Say hello to HAMMOND, he has a PROOF of GOD I'm sure you will find interesting. And Dr. CONRAD can explain to you that MAN is OLDER than COAL. You'll have lots of friends. Be sure to ask how Earl Curley is doing. :covereyes

Thanks for the lead Gord, and I may do that, but I have to compose what I have learned lately, in connecting up the DOTS... of 432, and try to finnish it off ...as I must get back to Chemistry and show how the electrons paired sexually, and how the geometry lead to the different shaped electronic configurations..... and the Platonic solids.

But I shall return to give a quiet, non distracting discussion forum for those truly interested in persuing 432, chemistry, and harmony ...

I can;t go without leaving a possible route of escape for those trapped here in wrath and name calling.

Its just not my thing, I like progress as mentioned and hate wasting time.

But I learned a few things HERE about aithiests.

Thanks for the lead Gord, it was sci.skeptics maybe in about three weeks I shall venture there.

Got to fly (literally and will with the Lord)
 
Nah, I am an old pecker and the fingers just can;t extend that far out any more. Too many athletic injuries and can;t even play the guitar anymore.

So you say...

You're surely not what JFR forums is about

that's still opne.

No as mentioned many times, I am a science graduate and not a literay liberal arts graduate. I am not into word games but truths... and so I don;t worry about crossed t's and spelling but PRINCIPLES and CONSISTENCY.

Health wise I am fine, except a few of my fingers donl;t bend that well because of sports injuries.
I'm 6'5" 230 pounds

You seem to have no problem reaching the '/" key, so you're probably just lying again. It would be easy to believe you slipped and hit ";" instead of " ' ", except that you're usually pretty consistent about using " ; " for some reason.

What kind of "science" did you major in where it's acceptable to lie about basic numbers (distance to the moon, anyone?), round large decimals to "close enough" divine numbers, ignore the scientific method, and not require evidence for your theories?
 
216,00 miles exactly from the barycenter to the Earth, at all times irregardless of our Revoultion variation distance around the Sun. The Sun and Moon are joined. Do you know know this, Did you miss reading that. No wonder I am leaving such intellectually dead rejecting negative false skeptics. True skeptics look for real answers. False skeptics reject everything for they want nothing and are nothing.
Did you not read that confirmation Johnny.

The Good Book calls the foolish WILLINGLY IGNORANT, and I AGREE.
 
216,00 miles exactly from the barycenter to the Earth, at all times irregardless of our Revoultion variation distance around the Sun. [...]

No, no it isn't. The barycenter is the center of mass of the system, around which both components rotate. As we have pointed out to you a few times, this is actually within the earth, between its center and its surface.

The Good Book calls the foolish WILLINGLY IGNORANT, and I AGREE.

mmmhmm.
 
"True skeptics believe me when I make ◊◊◊◊ up."

I'm still relatively new here. You people get this regularly, over and over, don't you?

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Good for you, as you have a perfect right so to do. I didn't even post in your threads until it was obvious you were only here to insult people. Good riddance.

For the record, I also have a website, and I have devoted a page to my analysis of everything you have said:

http://www.jeffprewitt.com/analysis.html

Prewit without wit, I think you answered the question, Do you have any intelligence. For it is SELF explanatory for yourSELF. Well done, that is the most intelligent thing you have said, this whole time, as you summed up your intelligence in one word... NOPE.
 
"True skeptics believe me when I make ◊◊◊◊ up."

I'm still relatively new here. You people get this regularly, over and over, don't you?

Respectfully,
Myriad
Yes, indeed, such has been The Way of the Woo since time immemorial.
 
216,00 miles exactly from the barycenter to the Earth, at all times irregardless of our Revoultion variation distance around the Sun. The Sun and Moon are joined. Do you know know this, Did you miss reading that. No wonder I am leaving such intellectually dead rejecting negative false skeptics. True skeptics look for real answers. False skeptics reject everything for they want nothing and are nothing.
Did you not read that confirmation Johnny.
Nope. :nope:

As has been pointed out, the barycentre is about 2000km below the Earth's surface. The zero gravity point (L1 Lagrangian) is about 200,000 miles from Earth, and varies constantly as the orbital distance of the Moon varies, due to the fact that its orbit is elliptical. At 216,000 miles you are beyond that and in high Moon orbit.

The Good Book calls the foolish WILLINGLY IGNORANT, and I AGREE.
Oh the irony!!! :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
216,00 miles exactly from the barycenter to the Earth, at all times irregardless of our Revoultion variation distance around the Sun. The Sun and Moon are joined. Do you know know this, Did you miss reading that. No wonder I am leaving such intellectually dead rejecting negative false skeptics. True skeptics look for real answers. False skeptics reject everything for they want nothing and are nothing.
Did you not read that confirmation Johnny.

The Good Book calls the foolish WILLINGLY IGNORANT, and I AGREE.


Barycenter aside, the claim you have made from the beginning is that the Moon was 216,000 miles from the Earth!

When you were shown repeatedly that this was stupid, you found another 216,000 number and you went with that instead.

Now all of a sudden, God's magic ratio of Moon diameter to Moon distance from the Earth has changed.

Newspeak.
 
216,00 miles exactly from the barycenter to the Earth, at all times irregardless of our Revoultion variation distance around the Sun. The Sun and Moon are joined. Do you know know this, Did you miss reading that. No wonder I am leaving such intellectually dead rejecting negative false skeptics. True skeptics look for real answers. False skeptics reject everything for they want nothing and are nothing.
Did you not read that confirmation Johnny.

Yes, but I also read the exchange that followed, as several posters just pointed out. You also originally said that it was the distance to the Moon, and only retconned this new thing in when prodded by numerous posters who provided you with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

You're still incorrect. "Exactly"... oh, that's too much. Especially coming from someone that rounded off to 432 with a number and decided it was "close enough".

I thought these numbers were divinely inspired. I though God himself ordained that as the distance to the Moon... at least that was your tune at the beginning of this thread. I suppose you hope we'll all just forget the intervening posts and accept this latest drivel. We've always been at war with EurAsia and all that.

Nice try, though. Guess you're just not a "true skeptic" even by your own definition.

So, what kind of "science" degree do you have?
 
Thanks for the lead Gord, and I may do that, but I have to compose what I have learned lately, in connecting up the DOTS... of 432, and try to finnish it off ...as I must get back to Chemistry and show how the electrons paired sexually, and how the geometry lead to the different shaped electronic configurations..... and the Platonic solids.

But I shall return to give a quiet, non distracting discussion forum for those truly interested in persuing 432, chemistry, and harmony ...

I can;t go without leaving a possible route of escape for those trapped here in wrath and name calling.

Its just not my thing, I like progress as mentioned and hate wasting time.

But I learned a few things HERE about aithiests.

Thanks for the lead Gord, it was sci.skeptics maybe in about three weeks I shall venture there.

Got to fly (literally and will with the Lord)

Err. No problem, See you on sci.skeptic then. My kill file works really well there.
:eye-poppi :covereyes :rolleyes: :jaw-dropp :cool: :boggled: :eye-poppi :covereyes :rolleyes: :jaw-dropp :cool: :boggled: :eye-poppi :cool: :boggled: :eye-poppi :covereyes :rolleyes: :jaw-dropp :cool: :boggled: :eye-poppi :covereyes :rolleyes: :jaw-dropp :cool: :boggled: :eye-poppi :covereyes :rolleyes:
 
Gee! I had to be away for a few days...

I would have thought there would have been more celebration or some to do when this thread reached... post 432!

:D
 
Maybe my cloak of invisibility is working. If not, I'll try a third time:

DJJ, on the internet I find sites supporting the moon landing and site attacking the moon landing. What advice do you have for people trying to determine which of these conflicting ideas is accurate?
 
Several of us have asked polite, relevant questions, and you continue to ignore us. This includes myself asking for clarifications on units, Terry and Wollery on earth/moon distances, and Ladewig on the moon landing. I think not only are you not interested in a true discussion, you really aren't interested in science.

One major point here that several people have made in a couple of your threads in this forum, that you continue to ignore, is that you are not approaching this as a scientist. When a new idea is tested scientifically, weaknesses and gaps are discovered and addressed by either revising the hypothesis, or abandoning it. Your responses sound more like that of an artist ("Critics! You are all mean!"), than a scientist ("Peer-reviewers! Thanks everyone!"). Many scientists often find during the review process that the gaps and weaknesses in a hypothesis can be more interesting that the hypothesis itself.

Here is a hypothetical scenario that demonstrates this point. I apologize in advance for any humor you may find insulting.

Davidjayjordan: "The sun is a perfect, YELLOW sphere in the sky. It;s perfection AND yellowness reflect the Lord;s DESIGN."

Hokulele: "Oh."

Wollery: "Actually, the sun is neither perfect (shows photograph from SOHO), nor yellow (shows chart of solar emissions in all wavelengths)."

Davidjayjordan: "Yellow is THE Lord;s favorite color."

Hokulele: "Cool picture, what are those black thingies?"

Wollery: "Sunspots."

Davidjayjordan: "I define yellow to BE the biggest number on the chart Wolley SHOWED."

Hokulele: "Are they really black, or do they look black because they are a different temperature from everything else?"

Wollery: "Hmm, good question. Let's find out. (Starts measuring temperature differentials.)"

Davidjayjordan: "You are all a bunch of aithiests who cannot see yellow for what it really is and ARE condemended to the REST of you;re miserable, monochrome existence."

Hokulele: (Posts mango recipe to keep the other posters entertained.)

Wollery: (Continues research in temperature differentials, which eventually leads to ground-breaking and Nobel Prize-winning research in sunspots and solar flares that will prevent disruptions in satellite communication.)

Prewitt81: "Nope."

Note: I am not suggesting that DJJ actually believes any of the above, that Wollery plans to switch to solar atronomy, or that my mango pie recipe is all that interesting.
 

Back
Top Bottom