Magically Healing Steel Columns

[TruthSeeker1234]

OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't appear until after the explosion.

 

[gumboot]

[qimg]http://www.veronicachapman.com/nyc911/NoDamage.JPG[/qimg]


OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't appear until after the explosion.

...

One word.

Resolution.

-Gumboot

 

[Pardalis]

So does that mean you're a "no planer"?

 

[Anti-sophist]

OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't appear until after the explosion.

I don't need physics to tell you that telling us what a washed out highly compressed photograph of a fast moving object looks like to you is unconvincing.

 

[Skibum]

You're right, those steel beams magically healed themselves. Wow, I'm convinced now.

Or perhaps you are just looking at a crappy photo.

 

[Gravy]

Can the words "butter" and "bumble" be far off?

 

[gumboot]

You're right, those steel beams magically healed themselves. Wow, I'm convinced now.

Or perhaps you are just looking at a crappy photo.

Worse. It's a still frame from a crappy video.

-Gumboot

 

[The Almond]

I have no earthly idea what you're talking about. What this looks like to me is a grainy photograph. What inferences are we supposed to make about it?

 

[Pardalis]

What exactly are you trying to dispute here Terrorcell? That a plane couldn't have hit the building?

 

[Alt+F4]

You're wrong "No Airplanes". I saw the second plane hit with MY OWN EYES, NOT ON TELEVISION. Are you going to call me a liar?

 

[Thunder]

My God!!!...Im convinced. 9-11 was an inside job. Thank you CNN!!!

Can I get my free Loose Change mug now?

 

[Pardalis]

The CTist mind is a strange thing.

Most people when they see that image see a despicable act of mass muder, but for some people like Truthseeker1234, they see steel columns healing themselves, a conspiracy... How people can twist their mind in such a way is unfathomable.

 

[pvt1863]

What you call the right tip being "visible" is glare from the sun. The entire wing is outside of the building and all but the tip is in the shadow of the tower. The small fraction that is not yet in the shadow of the building is reflecting sunlight. The glare on the wing tip and the glare on the back of the nearby engine, combined with the poor quality photo, cause the area of the wing between them (which is a similar color as the tower) to blend into the tower.

 

[beachnut]

OK OCTs, have fun explaining the physics of this one. To my eyes, it looks like the plane has half-entered the building. The right wing tip is showing, and the rest of the wing is already inside. But it looks like the steel beams have magically healed! The gaping plane-shaped hole doesn't appear until after the explosion.

The lack of resolution which will be pounded into you over and over. Latency. Slow speed shutter for high speed subject, you have 28 to 30 frames persecond when you need 2000 to 4000 frames a second.

The impact energy alone your are looking at is over 2200 pounds of TNT. Do you have any idea what is happening?

What is your point anyway?

 

[defaultdotxbe]

TS1234:

let me ask you a simple question

do you know the difference between progressive scan and interlaced resolutions?

 

[Loss Leader]

Truthseeker1234 is back again? Did I apologize in my sleep. Lest we forget, here were his own words:

I will have no part of this forum until one of the following two things happens: Loss Leader takes it back and apologizes, or Loss Leader is permanently banned.

So, as it is obvious that I have not been banned, permanently or otherwise, let me make one thing clear:

I have not apologized. I do not apologize. I never will apologize. I stand by all of my comments to TS1234 and restate and reaffirm them as though fully set forth herein.

But, as we know, reality is a flexible concept in the hands of a conspiracy nut. Whatever they need to remember, forget, be expert in, profess ignorance of or just assert without evidence - they are able to do it all.

Keep posting here Truthseeker1234, but post here knowing that you have been shown not even to speak the truth, let alone seek it.

 

[fuelair]

TS does not have a point ( except on top of his widdle head) but I give him credit for persistence of ignorance (related in a vague and unimportant way to persistence of vision).

 

[boloboffin]

Bring back a picture in which the long vertical stripes of the perimeter columns, one of the most striking architectural features of the WTC towers, are clearly visible, and then we'll see about planes "melting" into the towers.

 

[a_unique_person]

What you call the right tip being "visible" is glare from the sun. The entire wing is outside of the building and all but the tip is in the shadow of the tower. The small fraction that is not yet in the shadow of the building is reflecting sunlight. The glare on the wing tip and the glare on the back of the nearby engine, combined with the poor quality photo, cause the area of the wing between them (which is a similar color as the tower) to blend into the tower.

Sounds about right to me. It's an interesting optical illusion that is caused by a consumer quality device capturing an extremely fast moving object at a distance passing from light into shadow.

As someone has said already, there were plenty of eyewitnesses on the spot saw the actual moment of impact. I was watching TV when it happened, live. A quick blur shooting onto screen and then boom.

 

[hellaeon]

I would love to know TS1234, what on earth this means to you.

I really dont think your being serious with this latest 'smoking gun'. I believe your just trying to rattle the cages. The only other possible scenario is you really are far from intelligent.

EDIT: Come on TS1234, explain what your inferring with this mighty deduction of yours?