• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's really hard to say. We've had a lot of bigfoot discussions here as you know. I am searching.

I'm pretty sure you're going to come up empty on this board. I did a search for krantz + skookum and only turned up 12 posts of mine. None were what LAL was claiming.

I'm guessing, if it exists, it's over on the BFF.

RayG
 
Last edited:
It's really hard to say. We've had a lot of bigfoot discussions here as you know. I am searching.

Thank you. I'm subscribed to about 16 threads. Gotta be on one of them. I've searched three, but either I'm not using the right keywords or the posts aren't indexed. BFF got me better results and that's pretty unusual.
 
All those "Read Krantz" posts don't help either......

Sorry about that. I'll try to keep it to "Read Meldrum" from now on. That at least puts it in the time frame - those would all have been before Sept. 19 last year when his book was released. I'd pre-ordered and got it immediately.

It was prior to Huntster joining too, I think. I left for months when he joined.

Did you ever? Read Krantz?
 
I can prove I was in Houston, Texas in the early 70's, but it's far more difficult to prove what I did while there.

I'd like to be able to take P&G's word that things happened the way they've described, but some inconsistencies in their stories have my skepticals tingling. :cool:

RayG

Yes, but being able to prove someone was at the scene is half the battle - that is a hurdle BH has not yet overcome.

The issue of what P/G did once they arrived is a whole other issue.
 
I'm guessing LAL means this exchange between her and I:
LAL: You did much the same thing with Dr. Krantz' quotes, didn't you? He was dying and in so much pain he didn't want to talk to anyone, yet sceptics tried to discredit the cast by using those quotes and you just ate them right up (assuming it was you and not another poster on JREF who does much the same sort of thing - I don't want to have to plow through thousands of posts over there to verify that). According to DDA, whose post on it you might have read, Krantz thought it was genuine.

RayG: An appeal to pity? Not much of an argument.
In addition to another prime example of not providing a specific link, "assuming it was you and not another poster on JREF who does much the same sort of thing - I don't want to have to plow through thousands of posts over there to verify that", I think LAL has her Doctors confused. I'm betting she means the Dr. Meldrum quote I kept tossing about for awhile. The one where he says the Skookum Cast "constitutes significant and compelling new evidence...".

ETA: I found this right here on the JREF:

RayG: I don't recall Krantz ever being so close to a squatch that he got its butt print. :D (page 15, post #592 of the Bigfoot - Serious not follies thread)

RayG
 
Last edited:
Found another reference I made between Dr. Krantz and the Skookum cast over on the BFF.

It was in a reply to Rick Noll, and I said:

RayG said:
Grover Krantz and Jeff Meldrum, both scientists, had been proponents of bigfoot for many years prior to examining the cast. The two of them could hardly be called independent unbiased researchers. I'm not aware of any submission by either of them to a scientific journal with their findings. No matter what any of us like or dislike about that fact, it IS the way for us to progress further towards the solution to this mystery.

Pretty nasty stuff. :boggled:

ETA: Search turned up 12 posts on the JREF and 7 on the BFF. I don't see what LAL is implying I said or posted, so I'm going to have to hoist the BS flag on this one.

RayG
 
Last edited:
Actually we only have their word for it .. No more proof than what we have from BH ....

So, who had the camera? A couple of Bear? Of course it was Patterson and Gimlin, dont be difficult.

Ray, while I agree what they did was and is the central issue, you must be able to put BH in that area..

Can anyone do that? Its simply his word, which by the way changes depending on who is asking the questions.
 
......... Of course it was Patterson and Gimlin, dont be difficult.
......
How do you know that ?

We are interested in just the facts....... aren't we ?

I agree, it seems probable Patterson was the camera operator who captured the ' Patty ' footage, and that Gimlin was there; but we have no more proof of that, than we do that BH was wearing a suit in that film ..
 
How do you know that ?

We are interested in just the facts....... aren't we ?

I agree, it seems probable Patterson was the camera operator who captured the ' Patty ' footage, and that Gimlin was there; but we have no more proof of that, than we do that BH was wearing a suit in that film ..

If you can name me one person from that time that said the filmmaker was anyone other than Roger Patterson and that Bob Gimlin was not there - I will give you this point, but I dont think you can. That is something that has NEVER been in dispute..
 
So...its true what they say...old bigfooters never die, they just post on different forums!

So, you're suggesting an ape that is a hunter then, eating elk, rodents and fish? Like with Bigfoot, prove it.

We need only look at bears that live in Bigfoot's supposed habitat, they all, without exception, hibernate.

Primates did not simply just spread out from Africa. For instance in South American primates there are distantly related to African primates, through lower types of mammals but evolved independently. Same thing with Orangutans.

Now, I was assuming that the primate we are talking about would be an Asian ancestor that crossed the Bering land bridge as surmised by most Bigfoot proponents, however if you are suggesting that Bigfoot evolved separately from South American primates, you need to now explain the dearth of primate fossils in North America.

Even sedentary species can be distributed worldwide, through no fault of their own as continents and land masses shift.

Last weekend on Discovery Channels 'Best Evidence' they tackled Bigfoot and the biomass argument is still the biggest argument against Bigfoot. PS they also proved that a man in an ape suit could walk exactly like the person in the ape suit in the Patterson-Gimlin film.

Your arguments are misinformed at best.There is no way a primate larger than a bear could survive on pine needle soup.

I'm not even sure where to start with this post. The biomass argument is incredibly weak; Dr. Nina from the "Best Evidence" show should have discussed her lack of knowledge about the botanical and nutritional abundance of the PNW with anthropologists and botanists that actually work here.

Native Americans have been living in the PNW without the benefit of agriculture for thousands of years. More than 75% of their calories come from gathered plants, insects, and small game with the remaining 25% coming from larger game (deer, elk, etc.). The vast majority of the plants used as food (and of course, there are many more plants who's only use was for ceremonial or medical purposes) needed no further work other than to "pick it" (no need for processing and/or cooking). In fact, the resources in PNW were so vast and abundant, gathering only took up a few hours a day and like many agricultural societies, the native cultures here were able to develop complex "leisure" activities such as rock art, baskets, etc. The plants and their nutritional value are very well documented and I can provide references to anyone who would like them.

As an archaeologist/anthropologist, part of my job for the U.S. Forest Service is to identify plants that are important to Native Americans (and attempt to protect them). I often go into the field with the tribes, find the plants, and get a chance to "sample" them. Over the years, I have amassed quite the list of plants found in areas of bigfoot sightings in my area (including season, density, elevation, preferred habitat, other animals who want that food, and nutritional value). I have no doubt what-so-ever that there is more than enough food just in plant material and other proteins (insects, reptiles, fish, and small rodents) in the Spring, Summer, and Fall to support a primate (and this doesn't include any issue of hunting).

Winter, of course, would be a more difficult issue and I am still working on what is available for a non-hibernating primates in lower elevations (but I don't get out as often as I should). Of course, this would depend on the primate at least migrating down below the snow line, but since for bigfoot to even be a viable species, it would have had to migrate from Asia to America in the first place, so making an issue about bigfoot migrating up and down a hill is sort of a red-herring.

So simply put, an't no primate making pine-needle soup. No need to...there is plenty of yummy stuff available!

P.S. And in case anyone wants to debate that these plant resources were plentiful in prehistory but aren't as abundant in modern times, I assure you that the business of commercial pinenut, acorn, mushroom, braken fern, etc. are alive and well in your PNW National Forests.
 
Melissa wrote:
So, who had the camera? A couple of Bear? Of course it was Patterson and Gimlin, don't be difficult.
Melissa....we're talking Greg here...100% Skeptical Greg. :covereyes

His "analysis" of Bigfoot evidence is summed up very nicely in his quote that I use in my siggy line. :)

Greg's objective is to say that we don't really know anything about anything. In effect...to muddy the waters...to bring a picture OUT OF focus....whereas real, scientific analysis of any bit of evidence brings a picture INTO focus, by determining a greater probability for one explanation, and creating lower probabilities for other explanations.

Edited to add....
Melissa wrote:
That is something that has NEVER been in dispute..

"And then along came Greg :rolleyes: ......
NOW I'M A BIG DOUBTER!
There's NOT A TRACE...
Of TRUST in my mind :( ...."
 
Last edited:
If you can name me one person from that time that said the filmmaker was anyone other than Roger Patterson and that Bob Gimlin was not there - I will give you this point, but I dont think you can. That is something that has NEVER been in dispute..

What anyone says, is only hearsay, not proof ...

The fact that it is not in dispute by anyone is not proof either... ( Can you say ' anecdotal ' ? )


If you don't get it; I don't see how I can help you ... :)
 
Last edited:
What anyone says, is only hearsay, not proof ...

The fact that it is not in dispute by anyone is not proof either... ( Can you say ' anecdotal ' ? )


If you don't get it; I don't see how I can help you ... :)


I understand the meaning of hearsay - but you forget, the film constitutes proof they were in fact there, how else do you suggest they came to be in possession of this film? How did they cast the tracks? Unless you can provide evidence that Patterson and Gimlin were elsewhere?

Is there any proof BH was there? Did he retain any casts? Does he have in his possession the suit? Does he have anything that would put him in that very spot, can anyone put him there? What about receipts for gas purchases, food - something. I have never seen him provide one shred of evidence.

If it is your contention Patterson and Gimlin were not there, I would request you provide the proof, this is your claim - no one elses.
 
So...its true what they say...old bigfooters never die, they just post on different forums!
Welcome to the board, Hairy Man.:) I'm just curious, what do you think of the relevance of the PNW biomass argument in light of the fact that BF is reported all over NA? As I've already mentioned much, much further afield depending where your filters are set at.
 
Diogenes wrote:
What anyone says, is only hearsay, not proof ...

If you don't get it; I don't see how I can help you ..
It's the MOUNTAIN of physical and circumstantial evidence that firmly places Roger and Bob there...with the camera, filming the subject.
It's not just someone's word we have to take for it.

If you don't get it, Greg....and you certainly do not...I don't see how anyone can help you.
And that's not a bad thing...considering you have a closed mind.

Melissa.....you're falling into Greg's "Black Hole of Skeptical Arguments" by trying to ask him questions and debate this non-issue.

Resist......reeeeesist!!! :cool:
 
OH...I'd like to thank you, Melissa, for showing some support for me when I got booted off the BFF. Lu just recently told me you had sent a moderator a PM, protesting it.

Thank you very much...I really appreciate that. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom