• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Yet another Killtown expose....

One more of so called Killtown evidence: Rumsfeld carrying stretchers on 9/11 at Pentagon proves he is guilty of an inside job.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2764

"Yes, how did they know the attacks were over? How did they know there wasn't going to be a ground attack?

Proof Rummy knew."

Ref,

All that really tells us is that if Killklown was ever to attain a high office (HA!!! :D:D ) there's no way he would put himself in danger to help others.

As we note time and again, the 'truthers' do show their true characters when they accuse others of doing or behaving just as they themselves would.
 
Ref,

All that really tells us is that if Killklown was ever to attain a high office (HA!!! :D:D ) there's no way he would put himself in danger to help others.

As we note time and again, the 'truthers' do show their true characters when they accuse others of doing or behaving just as they themselves would.

Imagine him/her as a defence secretary, uh.. no thanks :p

I like the reasoning as the thread goes further:

"I think he is so smart that he planned an "obvious blunder" so people would say if he was involved in the planning of 9/11, he wouldn't plan an obvious blunder."

There is an explanation for every course of action. The way or the other, everything proves guilt. Had he gone straight to the bunker, what an obvious inside job that would be to him then, eh. Something like "Rummy is so smart, we would think of a deliberate blunder had he come out, so he went straight to the bunker, but we know he planned this!" or "He doesn't care about his fellow workers and citizens. This proves what a cold hearted man he is. He is capable of planning this."

This being said, the thing that bothers me about Rummy is those detailed drawings of the highly sophisticated and complicated Al Qaida underground base, that he presented on National TV. That base apparently never existed as such. Has there been any commentary on this?
 
This being said, the thing that bothers me about Rummy is those detailed drawings of the highly sophisticated and complicated Al Qaida underground base, that he presented on National TV. That base apparently never existed as such. Has there been any commentary on this?
Heh. Well... He also said we knew where the WMDs were. :rolleyes:
 
Heh. Well... He also said we knew where the WMDs were. :rolleyes:

Yep, that too :rolleyes: Not a guy you would trust. But still, Killtown's guilt logic is in a league of it's own. If somebody actually cared about his logic.
 
Last edited:
"James van de Velde HAS NEVER BEEN OFFICIALLY CLEARED by police"

http://www.wtnh.com/global/story.asp?s=5323482


So who do you all think killed this girl and why?

if you think KT's theory is utter nonsense then you all must have a more sensible logical one, right?
Quote mine much?
James van de Velde has never been officially cleared by police, although they did say DNA evidence found under Jovin's finger nails doesn't match him.
 
"James van de Velde HAS NEVER BEEN OFFICIALLY CLEARED by police"
Hmmm, it also occurs to me that our friend ErrorCell has never been oficially cleared by police.

So, Mr TC329, if that is your real name, why did you do it?
 
How typical of the highly intellectual JREF responses I've grown accustomed to on my rare visits to this sewer.

You guys know it wasn't the professor and now think it is either KT or Myself.

BTW, can someone help me better understand what this means :

"James van de Velde has never been officially cleared by police"

That must mean that the police still consider him a suspect, doesn't it?

Also, how did that whole thing work out with the phone calls to the police? Are they policing the internet for you all yet?
 
How typical of the highly intellectual JREF responses I've grown accustomed to on my rare visits to this sewer.

You guys know it wasn't the professor and now think it is either KT or Myself.

BTW, can someone help me better understand what this means :

"James van de Velde has never been officially cleared by police"

That must mean that the police still consider him a suspect, doesn't it?

Also, how did that whole thing work out with the phone calls to the police? Are they policing the internet for you all yet?

You're an angry lil elf, aren't you. So mad and mean spirited. No love as a child?

Like you really give a damn about this girl, you sick baby.
 
You're an angry lil elf, aren't you. So mad and mean spirited. No love as a child?

Like you really give a damn about this girl, you sick baby.

Totally avoided answering any question, mindless speculating, and an insult to finish it off. You fit right in.
 
How typical of the highly intellectual JREF responses I've grown accustomed to on my rare visits to this sewer.

You guys know it wasn't the professor and now think it is either KT or Myself.

BTW, can someone help me better understand what this means :

"James van de Velde has never been officially cleared by police"

That must mean that the police still consider him a suspect, doesn't it?

Also, how did that whole thing work out with the phone calls to the police? Are they policing the internet for you all yet?

The point is that Killtown should have asked the family
before possibly twisting the knife in their wounds. Nobody
would care about it if he had the "okay" from their family
members - and i guess that no one in here is against find-
ing the real murderer...
 
I've been here long enough to know they weren't being saracastic.

So who do you think killed her?

Obviously not, since one of them was me.

D'oh!

Kinda slipped by you, didn't it? Well, we try to make allowances for you all, being so glorious and all. And being so busy heading up a murder investigation on top of that.

How do you find the time?
 
Quote mine much?

I think I know why he wasn't cleared by the police. I bet it has to do with the fact that the police said she was attacked from behind, didn't put up a fight, and had no scrape marks on her hands.

What do you think?
 
"James van de Velde HAS NEVER BEEN OFFICIALLY CLEARED by police"

http://www.wtnh.com/global/story.asp?s=5323482


So who do you all think killed this girl and why?

if you think KT's theory is utter nonsense then you all must have a more sensible logical one, right?

TopCat14 go get her senior paper and see why UBL/OBL/CIA decided she had to go!

CTers on 9/11; 5 years and still no facts!

How long will it take KT to connect everything to 9/11?
 
Last edited:
I've been here long enough to know they weren't being saracastic.

So who do you think killed her?

Any comment on our part,given the evidence, would be " mindless speculating", as you so aptly put it.
Not bad, for someone born without the sarcasm gene.
Nice try
 

Back
Top Bottom