Discussion of the Pentagon taxi cab driver's impossible account.

who needs video...they've got 5 witnesses that saw it for a few seconds five years ago...count them 1 2 3 4 5...beat that with your stinking video...

lol

TAM
 
I think the deadline needs to correspond with their Psychiatrist appointments. Lyte Tripe and Muck are the prime fools. There IQ together would be of a 10 year old.
 
Translation: Rowe did say $20million, right?



OK, if you insist: THEY'RE ALL INSANE....all....ermmm..THREE of them...or just yanking your chain, or mis-remembering or mistaken.



JREFers? Not the evil gubmint wot perpetuated this crime of the senchury?

CRIKEY! We must be really scary with our questions and facts and 'nitpicking'.



Translation: It was $20million, right?



Translation: For a small fee, oh and do you have any music we can use?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lyte is worried about JREF'ERS and not the government that he accuses of mass murder?

Man Lyte smokes THE BEST crack!
 
11 more days left until the end of January, which was the latest "announced" deadline.

Awaiting another move of the goalposts shortly...

TAM
 
oh well...guess we will wait for the NEW deadline...

getting kind of boring though...

TAM
 
Dylan @LC said:
And for the record, Merc's thread was removed because it was disruptive. I shouldn't have participated at all.

But he needs to get his facts right too. A few bullet points:

- I used the other three days in DC to go visit my friends, ex-girlfriend, and then spent a whole day with April Gallop. I didn't "hide out" in my hotel room.
- Anyone who truly knows us knows the "fame and money" accusation is a tired, baseless ol' chestnut.
- If my documentary is half-assed, I can't wait to see his.
- I didn't threaten to sue. I clearly said I wouldn't. My distribution company might. And I never gave you any official permission to use it.
- Russ tells me you confirmed to him that you DID leave anonymous, caller-ID blocked voicemails on his phone. Which is it?
- Pot calling kettle black, anyone?

That's all
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2823&view=findpost&p=11351143
 

So Dylan will sue through his distro inc. and what is stopping the kids of those killed planning to take the LC money later this year. Now that is a CT.

CTers buy those LC DVDs to help the college fund of those kids of the victims soon having all the money from LC. How much is pain and suffering worth?

ivxx is the one who always is ironic telling those at LC that keyboarding is not the way, sticking to your computers is not wise; or some trash. But he does not miss his ivxx posts here; do you ivxx; Alex Jones the expert of...?

So the delay is a percieved delay cause LC hides all the little things in some lock box in some secret place only Dylan and ivxx can see. Are some posters as LC more equal than others? Was there a book like this?

What was the new realease date for the proof the Pentagon was just a fly over by some jet?
 
Unspecified, I think the anticipation of a delay is based on Dylan telling them they cannot use any of his footage, so now they will have to rework the video...ehnce the delay...I have not seen a new release date...

TAM:)
 
Lyte Trip :

(dylan avery @ Jan 20 2007, 09:48 PM)
(Lyte Trip @ Jan 20 2007, 09:35 PM)
We are on your side Dylan.

Please stop trying to make us enemies.

Listen, Lyte, I don't mind you. I'm not trying to make anyone enemies here. I realize you distrust Lloyd's account, but the way you've gone about it is a little out of line. That, and, I'm sorry, but the slander campaign was clearly directed at Russ, and I was made the bad guy for taking his side of the dispute.

For example, Total911.info reported on the preview I showed in NYC 9/10. He mentioned Lloyd saying the plane wasn't there afterwards, and Merc flipped out and PMd me demanding that I approve the release of information with him first. As if he paid the thousands of dollars to go to DC and stay there, and fly certain people out and buy other people hotel rooms.

Again, it's not the information I mind. Everyone's entitled to their opinion on what happened. But the way things have gone down is not a shining example, IMO.


Good. Then let's not be enemies.

Of course we distrust Lloyd's account! It's impossible and we now have PROOF that the plane didn't hit the poles.

How can discussing and spreading this information in message boards be a bad way to "go about it"?

Please explain this to me because this claim was repeated by Russell continually and has now been repeated by you.

The notion that we initiated a campaign against Russell is ludicrous. Merc and I had NOTHING to do with the original board meltdown.

After the new board came up I started participating right away and Russell and I had established a friendly dialog via email.

Then I posted my thread at jref about Lloyd.

Russell freaked out and proceeded on a tirade against us as a result and even called LLoyd to "tell on us".

How is there anything wrong with us discussing the Lloyd account on jfref or anyhwhere else?

Particularly in light of the explosive new evidence we have obtained.


Merc was not making "demands". As soon as we left Lloyd's house we were worried that his "conspiracy" tendencies would make him a darling of the truth movement while the undamaged hood and impossibility of his account would be ignored. Then the citgo witnesses confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt everything we believed about Lloyd. The cheering of the people at your presentation in New York of Lloyd's account confirmed our original fears.

Merc was expressing his frustration about this especially in light of the citgo witness account. (later corroborated by multiple people)

Perhaps his language came off demanding but you should have seen through that and understood this was about the evidence.

Not who paid for the hotel room.

All we want to do is open a dialog with you about the smoking gun evidence we have obtained.

I have no idea why you or Russell would refuse that simply because we have chosen to discuss the general information in advance online.

Again....what could possibly wrong with us doing this?

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=2823&st=0

hmmmmmmmmmm....sounds like one witness made the original claim for a north side passover (oy vey) and then they managed to dig up a few other witnesses who with (possibly) the correct coaching were able to corroborate this first witness statement.

How does one find out who was at a petrol station 5 years ago? Presumeably the witnesses they have must be people who were already interviewed in 2001.

Alternatively are they corroborating one citgo witness statement with witnesses from other vantage points?

Again, this whole 5 year delay is going to be the biggest weakness in their claims. It seems to be heading in the direction of a claim that the witnesses didn't know what they saw when they saw it because only the elite pentagon research team, armed with debts and some preconcieved ideas have been able to fully appreciate what the witnesses themselves have been unable to, or have kept quiet about for 5 years.
 
i'm sure i remember a comment, in a jref thread i think, by russ pickering that the elyte investigators had "manipulated" witnesses of the pentagon events. can anyone else recall this?

BV
 

Back
Top Bottom