(dylan avery @ Jan 20 2007, 09:48 PM)
(Lyte Trip @ Jan 20 2007, 09:35 PM)
We are on your side Dylan.
Please stop trying to make us enemies.
Listen, Lyte, I don't mind you. I'm not trying to make anyone enemies here. I realize you distrust Lloyd's account, but the way you've gone about it is a little out of line. That, and, I'm sorry, but the slander campaign was clearly directed at Russ, and I was made the bad guy for taking his side of the dispute.
For example, Total911.info reported on the preview I showed in NYC 9/10. He mentioned Lloyd saying the plane wasn't there afterwards, and Merc flipped out and PMd me demanding that I approve the release of information with him first. As if he paid the thousands of dollars to go to DC and stay there, and fly certain people out and buy other people hotel rooms.
Again, it's not the information I mind. Everyone's entitled to their opinion on what happened. But the way things have gone down is not a shining example, IMO.
Good. Then let's not be enemies.
Of course we distrust Lloyd's account! It's impossible and we now have PROOF that the plane didn't hit the poles.
How can discussing and spreading this information in message boards be a bad way to "go about it"?
Please explain this to me because this claim was repeated by Russell continually and has now been repeated by you.
The notion that we initiated a campaign against Russell is ludicrous. Merc and I had NOTHING to do with the original board meltdown.
After the new board came up I started participating right away and Russell and I had established a friendly dialog via email.
Then I posted my thread at jref about Lloyd.
Russell freaked out and proceeded on a tirade against us as a result and even called LLoyd to "tell on us".
How is there anything wrong with us discussing the Lloyd account on jfref or anyhwhere else?
Particularly in light of the explosive new evidence we have obtained.
Merc was not making "demands". As soon as we left Lloyd's house we were worried that his "conspiracy" tendencies would make him a darling of the truth movement while the undamaged hood and impossibility of his account would be ignored. Then the citgo witnesses confirmed beyond a shadow of a doubt everything we believed about Lloyd. The cheering of the people at your presentation in New York of Lloyd's account confirmed our original fears.
Merc was expressing his frustration about this especially in light of the citgo witness account. (later corroborated by multiple people)
Perhaps his language came off demanding but you should have seen through that and understood this was about the evidence.
Not who paid for the hotel room.
All we want to do is open a dialog with you about the smoking gun evidence we have obtained.
I have no idea why you or Russell would refuse that simply because we have chosen to discuss the general information in advance online.
Again....what could possibly wrong with us doing this?