• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Simple Challenge For Bigfoot Supporters

Status
Not open for further replies.
carcharodon said:
What good does showing pictures do on this site?LOL.

Even when you show scoftics some pics with links of bona fide caught and shot examples of alien big cats caught in the British countryside they still ignore it and scream

"Where is the evidence???"

Madness. This place is sheer madness. It's enough to make one take up murder.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Still misrepresenting people I see. No-one denied that alien cats had been found, just that it was likely that there were the 10-50 out there that you claim.
 
desertyeti said:
Plenty of dragon legends among the natives in Illinois (Piasa (sp?) bird).
Click to expand...

A bird is a dragon? Well. Learn something new every day.

And what's this about no desert yetis!?!?
Plenty of 'em!!!
The almas in the Mongolian desert!
Click to expand...

Thought by some Russian scientists to be surviving Neandertals, based on footprints. They're not yetis. Yetis aren't sasquatches. I edited my post to refer to NA.

The BF's running around in N. Dakota, the southwestern US, and yes, even the interiors of Oregon and Washing to, not to mention Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana (all of which have areas considered to be desert based on annual precipitation budget and all claiming sightings and prints).

The 20 inches of rain myth was started by John Green and quickly falls to pieces when all data are considered. But, hey, why bring up facts in a discussion about Bigfeetsus? Carry on.:cool:
Click to expand...

Myth, huh? I was wondering how someone could look at those maps and dismiss them entirely. You mean John Green the "editor"? who's "got a photo of it in his bible "Apes Among Us." "?

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2228110#post2228110

I have two copies, different editions, in my house as I write, and the photo is in neither. Who's making myths?

John looked for correlations with vegetation and population, but only found a "rough correlation" with rainfall. I don't have access to his database (he had close to 4000 reports when he gave up), so I'll have to rely on the BFRO's (unreliable, I know - they don't have them all, they don't publish them all and MM's a jerk):


Alaska 19
Arizona 38
Arkansas 64
California 347
Colorado 84
Connecticut 4
Delaware 2
Florida 106
Georgia 37
Hawaii
Idaho 49
Illinois 55
Indiana 47
Iowa 35
Kansas 26
Kentucky 46
Louisiana 32
Maine 13
Maryland 25
Massachusetts 10
Michigan 69
Minnesota 27
Mississippi 17
Missouri 52
Montana 23
Nebraska 7
Nevada 7
New Hampshire 9
New Jersey 35
New Mexico 30
New York 84
North Carolina 45
North Dakota 5
Ohio 190
Oklahoma 62
Oregon 197
Pennsylvania 78
Rhode Island 2
South Carolina 31
South Dakota 13
Tennessee 51
Texas 160
Utah 38
Vermont 6
Virginia 21
Washington 402
West Virginia 45
Wisconsin 41
Wyoming 24

http://www.bfro.net/gdb/#usa

Montana's right up there with.....Maryland. The first Montana town that came up on a Google search for rainfall has 22'' annually.

"ALTITUDE AND WEATHER - The elevation of Red Lodge is 5,555 feet. The annual rainfall in the area is 22 inches. Red Lodge, in a sample 30 year period, averaged only 3 days per year with maximum of 90 degrees or warmer and 26 days a year of temperatures of zero or colder. Red Lodge snowfall averages 52 inches per year, and there is an average of 105 frost-free days between June and September."

http://www.yellowstoneparknet.com/gateway_communities/red_lodge_montana.php

First report that came up, two witnesses, was of a female and offspring in a wooded area by a river.

See photos from the Pine Ridge res on the BBF thread concerning activity there for an idea of just how deserty that is.

This is the sighting map for Montana:

Montana.gif


http://www.bfro.net/GDB/state_listing.asp?state=mt#map

Central?

Compare the number of sightings to Washington State. Compare the number of sightings anywhere to Washington State.
 
Leo113 said:
"Bigfeetsus"? That's one of Mad Hom's favorite pet words. Surely, the good doctor is not Mr. Hyde as well?
Click to expand...

Not too original around here, are they? Any resemblance to drunken undergrads is purely coincidental. ;)
 
carcharodon said:
How do you know this particular person is sad, lonely and looking for attention? LOL, you don't even know this person's name, nor where this person lives.....but you can come up with a statement like that??????:jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

The fellow who told me he'd seen one cross the road appeared to be none of the above. He's a trucker, and was just back from a run to Las Vegas. We were talking about "out west" and Washington State and he threw the statement out as casually as he'd say, "I visited Seattle while I was there." Not a very detailed report, and hardly the only one from the area, but that's how most of them are.

A poster once said to a sceptic on an AOL board, "Who are you to judge people you don't even know?" I liked that. She used to live in Washington.
 
Illinois

piasa3.jpg


China

china-dragon-91-c.jpg


Great Britain

dragon.gif



images


Whatever.
 
Last edited:
William Parcher said:
The Bigfooters at Cryptomundo are already speculating that the recently found "wild woman" may have been abducted/adopted by Cambodia's Bigfoot (Nguoi Rung).
Click to expand...

And? I've read the Nguoi Rung haven't been seen since the 70's. Not all hairy hominids are "Bigfeet".

redir


Homo habilis
 
Lu, the feet don't matter towards the point. It's about the quickness of speculating that an undescribed bipedal primate (not human) was involved with this woman.
 
William Parcher said:
Lu, the feet don't matter towards the point. It's about the quickness of speculating that an undescribed bipedal primate (not human) was involved with this woman.
Click to expand...

You're taking the opinions of a couple of people commenting on Coleman's board as somehow representative of "Bigfooters"?

There's now a search on for a feral man.

http://www.cryptomundo.com/cryptozoo-news/2nd-wild-person/

Remember Ishi, the last of the Yahi? His people hid for 40 years near Oroville, California. When he "emerged from the wild", I doubt anyone thought he'd been raised by Bigfoots.
 
LAL said:
You're taking the opinions of a couple of people commenting on Coleman's board as somehow representative of "Bigfooters"?
Click to expand...

Coleman himself said this in his first blog on this woman...

A wild woman has been caught. A feral human being, that is. All the details have not been collected. After all, the focus of this story can’t speak to her family of origin, yet. But this much is known, a real woman, missing for almost two decades, has been found in the rainforest of Southeast Asia. I’m wondering, what if this woman was kidnapped 19 years ago by the Nguoi Rung, the wild forest people of Vietnam? Was the little eight-year-old girl, who was herding buffalo in the remote jungle along the (Kampuchean) Cambodian-Vietnamese border, snatched by the unknown hominids of the area?
Click to expand...

Coleman (who acts like a believing Bigfooter) lit the fire and others are gathering around.

The woman has not been determined to be "feral" in any meaningful sense. She hasn't been determined to be the lost girl either. She was found in the company of a naked man who also appeared to be "feral". That he was naked (presumably not covered with hair) did not stop Coleman from speculating that he might be a Nguoi Rung, even though those are previously described by Coleman as being hairy undocumented wild bipeds. We now know that this man was carrying a sword and had tattoos. After that update Coleman added this, "Perhaps nothing to do with the Nguoi Rung, but interesting to watch this unfold, anyway." Perhaps.
 
OK, here we go again. What do you think of this track? Real? Fake? Human? Squatch? Mid-tarsal break or rigid arch?

A cunning fake by a master or a walk on the beach?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4887.jpg
    IMG_4887.jpg
    124.8 KB · Views: 4
Big Les said:
Still misrepresenting people I see. No-one denied that alien cats had been found, just that it was likely that there were the 10-50 out there that you claim.
Click to expand...

LOL, nice try. I post links to pictures of bona fide caught and shot alien cats which are proven, then some super scoftic points at blurry pics and mockingly says "is that all the convincing evidence you have?". Don't you think that totally ignoring and sidestepping the fact that alien big cats have been caught or shot and then going on to ridicule inconclusive pictures was denial?

Wakey wakey.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71199&page=4

By the way, I haven't 'claimed' there are 10 to 50 alien cats out there. It was merely a suggestion, an idea. I haven't insisted it as a fact.

Not misrepresenting people are you Big Les?:rolleyes:

Guilty of hypocricy Big Les? Yup.
 
Last edited:
tube said:
OK, here we go again. What do you think of this track? Real? Fake? Human? Squatch? Mid-tarsal break or rigid arch?

A cunning fake by a master or a walk on the beach?
Click to expand...

Who can tell 100% from one picture of one track? More to the point, who can prove how it was formed?
 
RayG said:
And on the flip-side of that, how can SweatyYeti determine the validity of her encounter based on a phone call?

Is it possible he just believes?

RayG
Click to expand...

Ray, we have already done the flip side. The proponent's flip side is constantly mocked and ridiculed here. I was pointing out that the scoftics often use the very same arguments and reasoning that they bash the proponents for.

Don't you understand my point? The scofics ridicule the proponents for their belief structures yet it totally goes over their heads when they are guilty of doing exactly the same.

The hypocricy here is amazing. This is what I am getting at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom