• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Questions for 9/11 Truthers

Another question for the Truthers:

Did John Kerry risk his life in Viet Nam so that Alex Jones could call him a traitor?
 
Why aren't you guys all running around in gas masks, or are you immune to the "chemtrails"?
Why do yall hate bankers so much?
When did you first realize that--despite your lack of accomplishments--you were the smartest guy in the world?
Do you get headaches from staring at blurry YouTube videos all the time? Should you have your eyes checked?
Do you think you'd feel better if you stopped calling everyone and his brother a government shill (agent, Nazi, sheeple, scum) for a day or two?
If they can't get an independent investigation of 9/11, would the Truthers accept a government grant to go off and form their own country? We would love to see that.
 
Last edited:
Why do 'truthers' lack the common sense to realise that what appears to be common sense to them is completely the opposite to all the professionals and academics who have the sense to know that a warped sense of common sense is no match for a sensible sense of reality?

If that makes sense......
 
Three new questions the Truthers will never answer:

Why is Charlie Sheen's career doing so well?
Why do Truthers think "new world order" refers to world government?

From Maccy: If Al Quaeda is a fiction - why use 9/11 as a false flag against Afganistan? What is there to gain from invading it? Why not implicate Iraq directly? Why not throw in Syria and Iran while you're at it?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2255776&postcount=41

From T.A.M.: If OBL was a CIA operative/patsie then why did they need to make the "fake" video that all the CTers claim is fake?
If OBL is working fo CIA, than why would he initially deny responsibility for the attacks in the first place. If he was working for the CIA, and they wanted him to be the evil villain, than why would they have him initially lie, denying involvement?
To which I would add: If he was their villain, why hasn't the administration demonized OSL?
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2255376&postcount=21
 
Last edited:
Perry... yer level of ignorance is a threat to humanity. May, God forgive you for your gleeful promotion and blind endorsement of tyranny and injustice.

You are a sick individual... who would make a great poster boy for euthanasia.


Your membership agreement requires you to remain civil and polite toward other forum members. From this point forward, I expect you to adhere to this.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Perry... yer level of ignorance is a threat to humanity. May, God forgive you for your gleeful promotion and blind endorsement of tyranny and injustice.

You are a sick individual... who would make a great poster boy for euthanasia.
:rolleyes:

When will you apologize for your lies, your false accusations, and your mocking of the victims of 9/11? When?
 
Perry... yer level of ignorance is a threat to humanity. May, God forgive you for your gleeful promotion and blind endorsement of tyranny and injustice.

You are a sick individual... who would make a great poster boy for euthanasia.

HIS ignorance?

You're pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. You come here obviously in search of the truth, yet when it is handed to you on a plate you don't listen.

When will you apologize for your lies, your false accusations, and your mocking of the victims of 9/11? When?

Sadly, he won't, because he thinks that we're mocking the victims.

Now answer some of these questions, in particular:

If OBL was a CIA operative/patsie then why did they need to make the "fake" video that all the CTers claim is fake?
 
A poster boy for euthanasia? Am I still that cute?

28th's reaction suggests that these questions, properly used, really get under the Truthers' skin.
 
You come here obviously in search of the truth, yet when it is handed to you on a plate you don't listen.

For Christ's Sake... how do you hand someone the truth without a shred of evidence? How many times have I asked for evidence....only to be greeted with, "We don't have to prove anything... the burden of proof is on you."

PLEASE, hand me the truth... I'm 8383737 begging you. I've been begging all of you. For the love of God, show me the TRUTH! NIST IS NOT the truth. You people's absent-minded appeal to authority is deplorable. NIST doesn't even discuss the collapses... so how do you expect to get any evidence from them?

"It is one method of obtaining propositional knowledge, but a fallacy in regard to logic, because the validity of a claim does not follow from the credibility of the source. The corresponding reverse case would be an ad hominem attack: to imply that the claim is false because the asserter is objectionable."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_authority

You people adhere to both of these techniques... it doesn't matter if a Truther makes a great point... before you can determine the value and/or significance of it... you need to know their qualifications i.e. Schooling, Degree etc. This belief in the infallibility of the system is part of a conditioning that is designed to thwart any and all acts of fair and balanced judgment and/or decision making.

It's like this quote from The Little Prince:

"If you tell grown-ups, "I saw a beautiful red brick house, with geraniums at the windows and doves on the roof...," they won't be able to imagine such a house. You have to tell them, "I saw a house worth a hundred thousand dollars." Then they exclaim, "What a pretty house!"

You have all become (co-dependent) slaves to this machine... and that's why you feel threatened when someone ridicules and/or attacks the USG. You view their (USG) loss as your loss. But, sadly... the only thing you've really lost is the magic of youth i.e. the unadulterated optimism and exuberance about the world and your place in it.

You have all become exactly what the system intended you to be. Self-loving, cynics - who think they know everything. Which translates into fat, lazy, mindless skeptics.
 
Last edited:
You'll notice 28th didn't ANSWER any of Perry's questions; he just implied that Perry was ignorant and suggested that he should be euthanized.

OK, I'll play the game. 28th, I'm ignorant. Let me bathe in the font of your knowledge.

If Al Quaeda is a fiction - why use 9/11 as a false flag against Afganistan? What is there to gain from invading it? Why not implicate Iraq directly? Why not throw in Syria and Iran while you're at it?

If OBL was a CIA operative/patsie then why did they need to make the "fake" video that all the CTers claim is fake?

If OBL is working fo CIA, than why would he initially deny responsibility for the attacks in the first place. If he was working for the CIA, and they wanted him to be the evil villain, than why would they have him initially lie, denying involvement?

If he was their villain, why hasn't the administration demonized OSL?

I await your enlightening answers.
 
A poster boy for euthanasia? Am I still that cute?

28th's reaction suggests that these questions, properly used, really get under the Truthers' skin.

Yes, and I love how instead of even attempting to answer, he just attacks you.

Yet, you're the one resorting to ad hom attacks, and he's looking for the troof.

28IQ is indeed a treasure. Oh, and before uk_dave says it, a LIAR!
 
If Al Quaeda is a fiction - why use 9/11 as a false flag against Afganistan? What is there to gain from invading it? Why not implicate Iraq directly? Why not throw in Syria and Iran while you're at it?

I've already answered this earlier in the thread. Actually... I really stepped up and answered all of the original questions posed in this thread, although my effort was kind of overlooked. How surprising:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2182434#post2182434

If OBL was a CIA operative/patsie then why did they need to make the "fake" video that all the CTers claim is fake?
Just because OBL was a CIA asset in the past doesn't mean he worked with them on 9/11. The US also financed, armed, and trained OBL and the Taliban, but that doesn't mean they were still doing that in 2001. The point about OBL being a CIA asset, is to show the connection between him and the USG. It's like saying... a police officer charges John Gotti with a crime - like money laundering... but, then we discover this very same officer has old "business ties" with Gotti. Don't you think that's incriminating... and/or suspicious at the very least?

If OBL is working fo CIA, than why would he initially deny responsibility for the attacks in the first place. If he was working for the CIA, and they wanted him to be the evil villain, than why would they have him initially lie, denying involvement?
Just like Saddam... OBL was taken in and used up by the USG... until he became more of a liability than an asset. At which point... he was jettisoned.
 
Last edited:
For Christ's Sake... how do you hand someone the truth without a shred of evidence? How many times have I asked for evidence....only to be greeted with, "We don't have to prove anything... the burden of proof is on you."


Let's look at that again.

You claim that steel framed structures do not - in fact, cannot - fail due to fires. I post a technical rebuttal and links to two neutral academic papers that show (at great length) how such failures occur. You refuse the respond and put me on ignore.

Hmm. You are, sir, a fraud and a coward who deliverately misprepresents the matter at hand in order to hide your own ignorance.
 
A poster boy for euthanasia? Am I still that cute?

28th's reaction suggests that these questions, properly used, really get under the Truthers' skin.

This guy isn't looking for answers... I answered every one of his original questions... and he didn't even address my post.
 

Back
Top Bottom