Trying to get him to stay on topic is like trying to nail jello to a barn door.Call his bluff. Tell him you'll only debate 1 point at a time and that he has to provide substantive, detailed responses. Make it quite clear to any neutral readers that if it's derailed, it's his fault.
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| time | mass | height | velocity | acceleration | net force | resistance | kinetic energy |
| (s) | (kg) | (m) | (m/s) | (m/s/s) | (N)=(mass * acceleration) | (N)=(mass * g - net force) | (Joules)=(1/2 * mass * velocity^2) |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 0 | 1.00 | 1000.0 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 0 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 1 | 1.00 | 995.1 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 0.1 | 48 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 2 | 1.01 | 980.6 | 19.4 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 0.2 | 190 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 3 | 1.02 | 956.4 | 29.0 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 0.3 | 426 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 4 | 1.03 | 922.7 | 38.4 | 9.4 | 9.7 | 0.4 | 760 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 5 | 1.05 | 879.6 | 47.8 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 0.5 | 1196 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 6 | 1.07 | 827.3 | 57.0 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 0.6 | 1740 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 7 | 1.10 | 765.7 | 66.2 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 0.8 | 2401 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 8 | 1.13 | 695.0 | 75.2 | 9.0 | 10.2 | 0.9 | 3191 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 9 | 1.16 | 615.3 | 84.1 | 8.9 | 10.4 | 1.0 | 4123 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 10 | 1.21 | 526.8 | 93.0 | 8.8 | 10.6 | 1.2 | 5214 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 11 | 1.25 | 429.4 | 101.8 | 8.7 | 10.9 | 1.4 | 6484 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 12 | 1.31 | 323.3 | 110.4 | 8.6 | 11.2 | 1.6 | 7957 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 13 | 1.37 | 208.6 | 119.0 | 8.5 | 11.6 | 1.8 | 9661 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 14 | 1.43 | 85.5 | 127.4 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 11628 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| 15 | 1.51 | -46.1 | 135.8 | 8.3 | 12.5 | 2.3 | 13897 |
|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
28th,
This is a hypothetical illustration of a 1.0 kg falling object encountering some resistance and picking up some mass as it falls, to illustrate the relationships among mass, distance, velocity, acceleration, force, energy, and resistance.
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/mass.jpgCode:|------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | time | mass | height | velocity | acceleration | net force | resistance | kinetic energy | | (s) | (kg) | (m) | (m/s) | (m/s/s) | (N)=(mass * acceleration) | (N)=(mass * g - net force) | (Joules)=(1/2 * mass * velocity^2) | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 0 | 1.00 | 1000.0 | 0.0 | 9.8 | 9.8 | 0.0 | 0 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 1 | 1.00 | 995.1 | 9.8 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 0.1 | 48 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 2 | 1.01 | 980.6 | 19.4 | 9.6 | 9.7 | 0.2 | 190 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 3 | 1.02 | 956.4 | 29.0 | 9.5 | 9.7 | 0.3 | 426 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 4 | 1.03 | 922.7 | 38.4 | 9.4 | 9.7 | 0.4 | 760 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 5 | 1.05 | 879.6 | 47.8 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 0.5 | 1196 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 6 | 1.07 | 827.3 | 57.0 | 9.2 | 9.9 | 0.6 | 1740 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 7 | 1.10 | 765.7 | 66.2 | 9.1 | 10.0 | 0.8 | 2401 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 8 | 1.13 | 695.0 | 75.2 | 9.0 | 10.2 | 0.9 | 3191 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 9 | 1.16 | 615.3 | 84.1 | 8.9 | 10.4 | 1.0 | 4123 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 10 | 1.21 | 526.8 | 93.0 | 8.8 | 10.6 | 1.2 | 5214 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 11 | 1.25 | 429.4 | 101.8 | 8.7 | 10.9 | 1.4 | 6484 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 12 | 1.31 | 323.3 | 110.4 | 8.6 | 11.2 | 1.6 | 7957 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 13 | 1.37 | 208.6 | 119.0 | 8.5 | 11.6 | 1.8 | 9661 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 14 | 1.43 | 85.5 | 127.4 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 11628 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------| | 15 | 1.51 | -46.1 | 135.8 | 8.3 | 12.5 | 2.3 | 13897 | |------|------|--------|----------|--------------|---------------------------|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/height.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/velocity.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/acceleration.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/netforce.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/resistance.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g73/chipmunk_stew/kineticenergy.jpg
No child left behind.
Now animate it and provide a voiceover!![]()
No, but my company recently won a pretty big contract to ship product to Iraq.Chipmunk, do you cash a government paycheck? I'm not accusing you of anything, I was just wondering.![]()
No, but my company recently won a pretty big contract to ship product to Iraq.
Of course, our product will be delivered to hospitals and provide life support to babies, so accuse me of being a war profiteer at your peril.
Well we have to keep our main asset happy, don't we?So what you're saying is that you were in on 9/11, right?
Suuuuure they will be.And by "life support" you mean "blood for oil".
... my NWO-issue Hummer ... only gets 11 miles to the fetus.
Well we have to keep our main asset happy, don't we?
This is simply unbelievable... look at the black propaganda, being used against me... notice the numbers being used in these different posts... you people can't even get your facts straight... that's a dead give away. I had to go back and edit my original post, just to clarify that I didn't say this...
what we need to know (more than what caused the initiation) is how these marvels of structural engineering and design, managed to crumble to the ground in less than 15 seconds.
So... if we all agree that the lower structure (below impact floors) could have held the weight of the upper mass in a hypothetical situation where the impact floors were removed, and the upper mass was slowly lowered onto the lower floors/structure... than what we are saying is that the force from this weight (of the upper mass) falling 50-70 feet is what caused all of the lower floors to fail.
Now NIST...claims this force increased as the collapse progressed because the upper mass was increasing in size (presumably from the floors stacking in some capacity) so, my question is... when the upper floors fell down, and first made impact with the lower structure (below the impact floors) did those floors create any resistance... or do the laws of science not apply here?
The point I am trying to make... is why doesn't the resistance from each floor... slow the movement of the upper mass...
Doesn't NIST say... the collapse increased in speed as it progressed downwards? Meaning the resistance from the lower floors didn't slow the momentum of the upper mass, but actually increased it.
I talk about probabilities and that makes me a loon...
Another simple question... so if the material from the collapsing floors was stacking - wherein increasing the size of the upper mass... what was this material made out of? We know that the large steel outer columns were being blown to bits... and lots of concrete was being smashed into dust... so what indestructible material was the floors made out of?
I have dominated all of you on many different topics and in many different threads...
and now it's starting to get really stale and boring.. There's just no challenge to it anymore...
the only defense you people have are insults and chaotic theories which defy the laws of probability and the physical world....
I'm not kidding, folks... how could I possibly make this 4837 up?
No insurance company will pay more than the amount of the loss, as someone's said already.
Despicable.
<<<<<SNIP>>>.
Well that brings up an interesting question: what weighs more 1) 1 ton of bricks, 2) 1 ton of pulverised bricks ?
How many clowns out there realize that a pound of bricks placed on the head is no problem, but a pound of bricks dropping on your head from as little as 10 feet can be fatal?

I have dominated all of you on many different topics and in many different threads... and now it's starting to get really stale and boring.. There's just no challenge to it anymore... the only defense you people have are insults and chaotic theories which defy the laws of probability and the physical world....
I really have pity for you all... and have exercised some mercy at times - but when it comes down to me clearly proving NIST wrong... all of you are reduced to nothing more than babbling children... spouting off insults.
Remember, the major difference between truthers and deniers... is that truthers want to unite (with deniers) ... truthers want to be on the same team... truthers don't want conflict... deniers only want conflict... deniers will do anything to remain divided from truthers... And, therein lies the problem...
Hey! Where'd Ma Bricks Go?!