• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
You know the NIST report. You think it has evidence. You even sound like you know where it is in there. You should, you are treating it as "your "evidence. You find it and bring it for us to see.

I know this is an image showing the end section of a steel reinforced cast concrete shear wall. I am posting it directly for YOU to see. it is my/our evidence for a concrete core.

You have access to the internet too and you are failing to bring your evidence. Talk about pathetic. Get it!

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4973&stc=1&d=1168151709
Click to expand...

Too scared to read it Chris?
You just keep making excuses.
I and others have posted the link many times over.
Here it is again: http://wtc.nist.gov/

I/we made the effort to go to your web site and suffer through reading your stuff. Do us the same courtesy.

We made the effort, now it's your turn.
 
uruk said:
Too scared to read it Chris?
You just keep making excuses.
I and others have posted the link many times over.
Here it is again: http://wtc.nist.gov/

I/we made the effort to go to your web site and suffer through reading your stuff. Do us the same courtesy.

We made the effort, now it's your turn.
Click to expand...

I just did a google site search on the site and it didn't turn up any images of raw evidence. Just words. Easily falsified. All with no veracity. Not like images. Very much in question. This is produced by the same infiltrated government that illegally removed and destroyed evidence.

If you think there is something in there that has the veracity of raw evidence. You find it.
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
I just did a google site search on the site and it didn't turn up and images of raw evidence. Just words. Easily falsified. All with no veracity. Not like images. Very much in question. This is produced by the same infiltrated government that illegally removed and destroyed evidence.

If you think there is something in there that has the veracity of raw evidence. You find it.
Click to expand...

You didn't go to the site. Otherwise you would have known that the reports are in PDF format and downloadable for your perusal. (and YES they have PICTURES in it, for god's sakes your pathetic)
Quit lying, quite making excuses. Read it.

Or are you scared, lazy, dishonest?

Here's the link to the page for the downloads: http://wtc.nist.gov/reports_october05.htm
 
Last edited:
uruk said:
You didn't go to the site. Otherwise you would have known that the reports are in PDF format and downloadable for your perusal. (and YES they have PICTURES in it, for god's sakes your pathetic)
Quit lying, quite making excuses. Read it.

Or are you scared, lazy, dishonest?

Here's the link to the page for the downloads: http://wtc.nist.gov/reports_october05.htm
Click to expand...

I used a google site specific image search on wtc.nist.gov. NOTHING.

I'm tired of subterfuge. I need genuine. The real thing. UNDERSTAND?

I loath PDF's.

You know your evidence right? You find something with veracity. I've wasted a couple of hours in the last 2 of years trying to find something verifiable relating to the core, I cannot find anything.

Keep in mind, I know FEMA didn't have the blueprints and NIST depends on them.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/blueprints.html

If you think there is evidence in there that is as good as images of raw evidence, you find it.

This I know is good. It is an image showing 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS and no steel core columns appear in the core area and if the steel core columns existed, they would be seen there.
 
chris, why did you start a new thread when your thread is still open? Until its closed, you should sTAY in the thread that is still open.
 
Jebus, why do all of you keep feeding Chris? Who's more insane - Chris or those who keep engaging him knowing that he has no basis for his position?

I beg of you. Just do not respond. At all. Ever. Let this thread die. Let all of his threads die.
 
Chris, please realise that after a couple of dozen pages on your original thread it turns into madness porn, and you're the one wearing suspenders and a smile.

That's the reason people go there, mate, it really isn't about debating you because you've said many times that there you'll never change your mind. It really is all about voyeurism.

Don't mean to be harsh, because I actually quite like you when you're being funny, but there you go.

I'm not posting on this or the other thread again.
 
Christophera said:
I used a google site specific image search on wtc.nist.gov. NOTHING.

I'm tired of subterfuge. I need genuine. The real thing. UNDERSTAND?
Click to expand...
The real thing is there. no subterfuge. I lead you to it. So read it.


I loath PDF's.
Click to expand...
So what? Your lazy? You can't read? What's the deal? You need someone to read it to you like a child wanting a bed time story?

You know your evidence right? You find something with veracity. I've wasted a couple of hours in the last 2 of years trying to find something verifiable relating to the core, I cannot find anything.
Click to expand...
That's because your looking for something specific to back up your claim. Problem is that it doesn't exist. All reputable sources clearly state steel core.
It's not my problem your hypothesis is wrong.

Keep in mind, I know FEMA didn't have the blueprints and NIST depends on them.

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/blueprints.html
Click to expand...
We all know how reputable that source is.
If you would look at the reports You would see how detailed the information they had is. But you'll never know that will you. Your too lazy or too cowardly to look.

If you think there is evidence in there that is as good as images of raw evidence, you find it.

This I know is good. It is an image showing 3" REBAR ON 4' CENTERS and no steel core columns appear in the core area and if the steel core columns existed, they would be seen there.
Click to expand...
So wheen you got nothing you resort to posting old stuff that has been delt with before.

I got news for you Chris. Photos can be faked and, more importantly, misinterpreted.

We read your stuff. Now read the reports or show yourself to be the intellectual coward we all know you are.
 
SezMe said:
Jebus, why do all of you keep feeding Chris? Who's more insane - Chris or those who keep engaging him knowing that he has no basis for his position?

I beg of you. Just do not respond. At all. Ever. Let this thread die. Let all of his threads die.
Click to expand...

Yea, your right.
I'm out!
 
CHRIS, GET HELP!
wtc-1.construction.1.jpg

http://www.terrorize.dk/911/images/wtc-1.construction.1.jpg
 
Merged the two threads - Christophera don't start new threads to discuss this matter.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
I'll be here tonight, an open mike:

Doors open @ 5:45pm.

Lottery sign-up.

$5 cover per person.

See you then!

-Comedy Village
82 West 3rd Street (btw. Thompson and Sullivan)
Manhattan, NY 10012
http://blog.myspace.com/comedyvillage

P.S. We do these emails to keep you informed fast and easily about our
mics. The general comedy websites can take a while to update, so it's
just faster this way. In the event, however, that you want to be off
this list, please reply with "Remove" in the Subject line. Thank you.
 
Darat said:
Merged the two threads - Christophera don't start new threads to discuss this matter.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
Click to expand...

I thought that it was appropriate because the first thread which was supposed to be about others success at finding a realistic explanation for free fall and it ended up being a gatekeeping operation on the concrete core for deniers. Perpetually off topic.

In 264 pages not one realistic explanation for free fall was offered.

Since its labelled one thing and is actually about another, I thought it was time to try and clean it up and make the title represent the content.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom