Gravy
Downsitting Citizen
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2006
- Messages
- 17,078
No more "just asking questions." I want to see a logical narrative.
Batter up!
I bolded a word so 28th wouldn't miss it.No more "just asking questions." I want to see a logical narrative.
Batter up!
I bolded a word so 28th wouldn't miss it.Yup, but not in the way you think you mean!
Mes amis americanes, the new Scots word for today is Keech. A perfect description for 28th's spurious arguments.
keech (pronounced keeCH):
Keech is excrement.
keeker:
A keeker is a black eye.
I had a right keeker the next morning. The word is from keek.
keelie (rhymes with steely):
1. A keelie is a young working-class male from a city or large town. The term is generally derogatory and implies that the person is rough, tough, and a potential hooligan. In Glasgow, however, it is sometimes used more neutrally. Also, in Glasgow girls can be called keelies.
a Glesca keelie The word comes from the Gaelic gille a lad.
Yep, I think we have a winner! Just make sure 28th doesn't give you a keeker, you internet keelie!
I want you one on one in our own thread... and if you choose to decline my challenge, than you concede defeat by virtue of cowardice.
I need not qualify to debate you by answering any one particular question. If you want something addressed, than bring it into the thread.
My 600+ posts, speak for themselves.
Whit, a wee bachle (or bochle) like him? He's just a nyaff.
Incidentally, it might be me that gives him the shiner......
See? It's an education on this site!
I'm thinking of challenging him to a Kendo match, and accusing him of cowardice if he refuses. And if he accepts, it means I'd get to hit him in the head with a big stick. Either way, it's good.
Nice use of Keelie.![]()
My own eyes told me that snooker was even more boring to watch than cricket.......![]()
Baggses me a shot with him at epee first; more chance to cause injuries before a final death blow.
So what makes the - 9/11 is an Inside Job Belief - such an unbelievable one? Tell me... logistically - why it was impossible for Israel and the US to pull off 9/11 i.e. because the US would never harm its own people.
We're not talking about the specifics of the execution of operation 9/11 i.e. star wars beams and holographic wings.
I am asking what makes it impossible for professionally trained military agents to plant explosives in buildings...
What makes it impossible for explosives to bring down high-rise buildings...
What makes it impossible for corrupt entities to pull off false-flag attacks...
What makes it impossible for the US to fly commercial size airliners... either by remote or with (hired) suicide pilots....
Please, shed yer ego and remove that red, white and blue war paint from yer face - and tell me specifically why it was impossible for 9/11 to be an inside job.
The point about common sense here perfectly demonstrated. 28th uses "common sense" to tell us that his hand can't pass through a steel door. I've actually seen a truther video which used someone walking through a door as some kind of illustration of how it's "impossible" to be on the other side of the door without opening it. Somehow both the movie makers and 28th have forgotten that with sufficient force, his hand could easily pass through the door. There wouldn't be anything left of his hand, but there doesn't need to be. The answer to his considerations of what NIST should have determined is simply that he does not have the imagination to understand that sufficient forces were more than available in a half-a-million ton building. As calcuated by NIST and by other independent bodies. It is very far from physically impossible for the core to have been crushed down with the rest of the building, seeing as it wasn't made of neutronium but the same stuff as the rest of the building.
Common sense may be telling 28th that a box cutter can't be used as a threatening weapon. Common sense tells me that they bloody well can (in fact I've been scared of Stanley knives my whole life). Common sense tells 28th that a big plane is difficult to fly. Common sense tells me that the hardest parts of learning to fly - takeoff, landing and communications - were not part of what the hijackers needed to do. Incidentally, common sense also tells me that you cannot simultaneously complain that the iggerent ay-rabs couldn't have known how to fly an airplane and at the same time blame the authorities who didn't stop Atta etc from taking flying lessons.
I am asking what makes it impossible for professionally trained military agents to plant explosives in buildings...
What makes it impossible for explosives to bring down high-rise buildings...
What makes it impossible for corrupt entities to pull off false-flag attacks...
What makes it impossible for the US to fly commercial size airliners... either by remote or with (hired) suicide pilots....
What makes it impossible for you to give a clear narrative of what happened on 9/11?
I am asking what makes it impossible
What makes it impossible
What makes it impossible
What makes it impossible![]()
We're going to need a new badge. One that says "NOT On 28th's Ignore List". It'll be much smaller group.
But not as boring as darts.
The only thing in this world more boring than playing golf is watching it on TV.