• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

10 story hole in WTC 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

Christopher7

Philosopher
Christopher7
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
6,538
Jaydeehess says that anyone who takes the time to read the NIST report Apendex L

doesn't believe that there was a 60' to 80' hole floor 10 to the ground in WTC 7 [as described on pg 18]
[post 801 Some simple Tower 7 questions thread]

Who believes that there was a '10 story hole' and who does not?
 
Yes there was a massive hole caused by falling debris. Your point?
 
Christopher7 said:
Jaydeehess says that anyone who takes the time to read the NIST report Apendex L

doesn't believe that there was a 60' to 80' hole floor 10 to the ground in WTC 7 [as described on pg 18]
[post 801 Some simple Tower 7 questions thread]

Who believes that there was a '10 story hole' and who does not?
Click to expand...

No, you mean "10 hole story", which is what yours is.
 
Quad4_72 said:
Yes there was a massive hole caused by falling debris. Your point?
Click to expand...

There was no 10 story hole as described on pg 18

Point # 2

NO one here will answer this question directly with a yes or no
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to get sucked into sticking with a specific number on the size of the hole.

Instead I will say that I believe it was as big as the FDNY reported it to be(wich was quite large).

You appearantly concur with FDNY's reports of secondary explosions in the WTC, do you also concur with thier reports that WTC7 was too damaged to remain standing for very long and was about to collapse?
 
Not sure about the exactness of the 10 story part. Might have been larger, but the FDNY guys say so, so YES!


ETA: Sword O'Truth beat me, Do'h...
 
Last edited:
Christopher7 said:
There was no 10 story hole as described on pg 18
Click to expand...

Yes, there was a very large hole. It could have been larger than 10 stories, making your statement technically true. I'm not going to get into a virtual urination contest about exactly how big the hole was.

Exactly where are you going with this?

You should really actually read the preliminary NIST report. Even if you think it's all lies, it has some nice photographs and diagrams of the damage done to WTC 7, among other things. It's not like it's only the claims on page 18 with nothing to back it up.

NO one here will answer this question directly with a yes or no
Click to expand...

Now that is a lie.
 
Last edited:
HA! Off-topic, but I've just been suspended for a month at the LC forum. Does that earn me a badge, or do I need to be banned?
 
Well, it only took me three days and 32 posts to get one month off.
6197458857e0c6add.gif
 
Christopher7 said:
There was no 10 story hole as described on pg 18

Point # 2

NO one here will answer this question directly with a yes or no
Click to expand...
Yes there was a large hole #7.

I didn't measure the hole but if the FDNY says it was about 10 stories, than I would say there a hole about 10 stories.
 
Dog Town said:
I wonder how many actual members they "really" have? I am guessing, they have banned over half of the 1000 members, they claim to have.
Click to expand...

They're so damn paranoid. Like it would kill them to allow people to freely express dissent. We let the CTists have the run of this place, until they start making threats of legal action or ignoring the rules.

I guess in the CTist world, it is the content of your ideas that get you censored, rather than your conduct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom