• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Truthers Take On NIST

An Architect without a degree writes 28 pages critiquing a 10,000 page report compiled by over 200 scientists varying from structural engineers to fire experts with pHd's.

Guess I'll join the truth movement then :scared:
 
I posted this in another thread to echo the statements I made earlier about how NIST drew conclusions that totally contradicted the results they received from their real-life experiments. NIST eventually setup computer simulations...that could be manipulated until it spit out the answers they were looking for. This paper beautifully articulates how I feel about the NIST report:

http://www.nistreview.org/_media/documents/MISC/NCSTAR1-REVIEW-DOUGLAS.pdf

NIST's theory is based in science, alright. Science fiction.
 
28th Kingdom said:
I posted this in another thread to echo the statements I made earlier about how NIST drew conclusions that totally contradicted the results they received from their real-life experiments. NIST eventually setup computer simulations...that could be manipulated until it spit out the answers they were looking for. This paper beautifully articulates how I feel about the NIST report:

http://www.nistreview.org/_media/documents/MISC/NCSTAR1-REVIEW-DOUGLAS.pdf

NIST's theory is based in science, alright. Science fiction.
Click to expand...

Funny, that is what I think about Eric's work, now you have confirmed it!
 
Hey Fungface...Your official story is slowly crumbling...don't wait for the ship to go down...come and join the dark side.
 
28th,

Just because a few kids on the Loose Change forum are "waking up" doesn't count for anything, and neither do you.

Go outside, into the real world and you'll come to the shock realization that no one is buying into your crap.

28 pages against the official story, which all contain ridiculous errors and the official story is crumbling? Come on!

Last I checked Alex Jones said your movement was dying. Wake up buddy, you're going no where and 20 years from now you'll still be mouthing off on internet forums because that's as far as your story has gotten.

The 9/11 Truth movement has p*ssed off the victims and first responders at Ground Zero but that's as far as you have, and ever will have gotten.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Hey Fungface...Your official story is slowly crumbling...don't wait for the ship to go down...come and join the dark side.
Click to expand...

doubledumb is back, how do you put everything as 1984, life is not a book

This comes from someone looking up from the bottom of the ocean of CT lies?
 
Excuse me?

You made the mistake of claiming I edited my post. I didn't edit anything or edit it back. You should read stuff before you comment on it, you have a problem with that.
 
doctorfungi said:
Excuse me?

You made the mistake of claiming I edited my post. I didn't edit anything or edit it back. You should read stuff before you comment on it, you have a problem with that.
Click to expand...

LOL you edited it then you saw I had quoted you so you edited it back.

What a sad liar.
 
Fungi if you are not a troll can you explain this thread you started at ATS:

I'm Sorry

In 2002 I made my first visit to ATS when I was looking around the Internet for pictures and/or videos of UFO's, secret military aircraft and similar things like that.

I was browsing about once a month on ATS and never actually joined this great community. That changed in 2004 when I registered under the username "ShaneMcbain". I posted here every now and then but my main posts were outside the 9/11 forums. I was at the time, however, researching the events of 9/11.

I loved posting here. The arguments were stellar, the debates were intriguing and the people were nice. I loved ATS.

August of 2006 came around and the infamous "August 22nd" prediction was pretty much the main topic around here. To be honest it had me quite frightened and I eagerly awaited the day. I was almost 100% sure something was going to happen and this was pretty scary. The day passed and everything went as usual. With a big sigh of relief I decided that I didn't want to feel like that again. I didn't want to be scared by random predictions and hypothesis being posted here. As I result I installed a web site blocking tool and blocked ATS and said I wouldn't come back.

About a month later I became more involved in 9/11 research and remembered that ATS had a 9/11 forum. Agreeing with myself to ignore any prediction threads I signed up again with the username "doctorfungi". I started posting and created my avatar by using the logo of a local music group also named Doctor Fungi. I love the name.

In life I try to avoid arguments I know people cannot be swayed in. That's basically religion and politics. Unbeknownst to me at the time, 9/11 is sometimes also in that category.

I started posting in the 9/11 forum after my views on the events had changed. I was originally a 9/11 Conspiracy Theorist and firmly believed that the government was behind the attacks.

My attitude towards the people who believed these theories was objective at first. I wanted to point out the errors in these theories and hopefully get people thinking that maybe these theories were a sham, as opposed to the official story. That's when I noticed people didn't take too well to being questioned.

I increasingly found myself involved in verbal fights as opposed to debates and my U2U inbox was often filled with people wanting to harm me. That's about the point I realized I was unpopular around here. I decided I would continue to post in the 9/11 forums. I almost changed my username after I was thrown abuse at me by ThichHeaded about a month ago. I thought I should start fresh. But for some reason I didn't.

So yet again, I continued to post in the 9/11 forums. After receiving verbal abuse, threats and being called a government agent on numerous occasions I decided that it was time to call for help. I posted over at randi.org to get a few more critical thinkers over here at ATS.

This hasn't been taken in so well by the ATS community. I understand the reasons behind this and if I could, I would delete the thread at Randi. I can't even edit my post over there.

Each and every day I have to muster up courage to even click on Above Top Secret in my favorites list. I'm not saying that's someone's fault other than my own. But it isn't a nice feeling knowing you are hated by alot of people.

The purpose of this thread is to say sorry.

I've obviously pissed alot of people off. I'm not sure exactly how it started but I do know that I didn't start out here with an aggressive nature.

This is an apology directed towards everyone at ATS I have ever offended by mocking their judgement, by insulting their intelligence or by bashing their logic. I am apologizing for my attitude towards 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists and Truth Seekers.

This is not an acceptance of your version of events. Nor is it a way of me agreeing with you. It's my way of saying that I'm sorry for the things I have done to achieve my "troll" status.

I will continue to post in the 9/11 forum. I will continue to question the Conspiracy Theories AND the official story. But the ways I go about doing this and voicing my findings are dramatically going to change. This is of course if the Administrators and Moderators of this amazing work of web design can find it in their hearts to forgive me and allow my further contribution to ATS.

I'm sorry.
Click to expand...


http://www.belowtopsecret.com/thread233629/pg1
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom