Pearl Harbor was an inside job

I kinda wish now that I would have like spent a day or two and REALLY got a good CT goin. There are so many factors that I could touch on. But oh well! Haha. At least I am keepin everyone on their toes!
 
I think you're on to something here.

Why were the carriers out of port that day? A little too convenient methinks.

I had head that the ships which were hit had dangerous levels of asbestos in them and that decommisioning would have cost $600million. That cannot be ignored.

And why did the arizona sink? Are there any photos of the 'severe' damage before it went down, into it's own footprint I might add.

Then of course there is the case of Larry and Ethel Goldberg who were breifly arrested within 3000 miles of pearl harbour after Ethel was heard to exclaim 'oy vey' at the precise time of the attacks, though it was later claimed it was their honeymoon. Do jews even have honeymoons?

I'm thinking of making a video.........
 
Dang it. I was going to open up my can of "Whoop [Rule 8]" when I read the entire thread.

I need to check in for high blood pressure.
 
Ah, and using the CT principle of Cui Bono, it becomes obvious who was responsible for the attack: The French!
 
uk_dave said:
I think you're on to something here.

Why were the carriers out of port that day? A little too convenient methinks.

I had head that the ships which were hit had dangerous levels of asbestos in them and that decommisioning would have cost $600million. That cannot be ignored.

And why did the arizona sink? Are there any photos of the 'severe' damage before it went down, into it's own footprint I might add.

Then of course there is the case of Larry and Ethel Goldberg who were breifly arrested within 3000 miles of pearl harbour after Ethel was heard to exclaim 'oy vey' at the precise time of the attacks, though it was later claimed it was their honeymoon. Do jews even have honeymoons?

I'm thinking of making a video.........
Click to expand...
Good idea, the video. As a title might I suggest:

Loose Lips (sink ships)
 
uk_dave said:
I think you're on to something here.

Why were the carriers out of port that day? A little too convenient methinks.

I had head that the ships which were hit had dangerous levels of asbestos in them and that decommisioning would have cost $600million. That cannot be ignored.

And why did the arizona sink? Are there any photos of the 'severe' damage before it went down, into it's own footprint I might add.

Then of course there is the case of Larry and Ethel Goldberg who were breifly arrested within 3000 miles of pearl harbour after Ethel was heard to exclaim 'oy vey' at the precise time of the attacks, though it was later claimed it was their honeymoon. Do jews even have honeymoons?

I'm thinking of making a video.........
Click to expand...

Haha Hilarious. I think everyone may be missing the sad part about this thread though. That first post that I made which took me a total of like 20 minutes is no more crazy than the 9/11 theory that people believe. This is the part that is no joke. People believe things like this. If I were to really work on a "Pearl Harbor CT" I guarantee you that I could get people to start believing it. All it takes is a fictional movie set up like a documentary playing on people's fears and emotions to start and infectious spread of lunacy.
 
Somebody should nominate Quad's OP - it is awesome. I have been here less time than him, so I'm not sure if i can nominate yet!

I'm surprised no one mentioned the fact there is a real, and vaguely respectable in academic circles, Pearl Harbour conspiracy theory though --
namely whether intelligence relating to a[possible attack was withheld from Pearl Harbour.

I don't believe it for a moment - never suggest conspiracy where incompetence suffices -- but there is real debate over who knew what and when. It is a classic example of multi-agency intelligence failure.

cj x
 
[Curmudgeon Mode/] Guys, put these things in humor if you want to try to satirize these a**hats, okay? I've only been around for about six months, but this is already the third or fourth such attempt, all in different veins, but much the same result. There are a number of rather sharp knives in the drawers here, and the first cry of "fake" or "troll" is usually in the third or fourth post.

I'm an old geezer and I've been fighting with FDR conspiracists, and JFK conspiracists for years. This is not that far off from what one of those ilk could believe in.

If you want to post in CT and try your hand at humor, do as any number of vets here would do, and open with a line introducing it as such. Otherwise Humor is a far better venue. [/Curmudgeon Mode]
 
cj.23 said:
Somebody should nominate Quad's OP - it is awesome. I have been here less time than him, so I'm not sure if i can nominate yet!

I'm surprised no one mentioned the fact there is a real, and vaguely respectable in academic circles, Pearl Harbour conspiracy theory though --
namely whether intelligence relating to a[possible attack was withheld from Pearl Harbour.

I don't believe it for a moment - never suggest conspiracy where incompetence suffices -- but there is real debate over who knew what and when. It is a classic example of multi-agency intelligence failure.

cj x
Click to expand...
Yep, CJ. And welcome!

The CT mindset is a constant, and the "Pearl Harbor foreknowledge" idea tantalized them for awhile. But kind of limited. Tough to prove. And not much incentive to go hog wild, what with WW2 seen as a "just" war.

Then JFK got shot by Oswald and that opened the floodgates to CT fetishism. The "science" of CTism was forged, perfected, packaged and served up to a rabid mob of Baby Boomer CTers, with JFK.

9/11 is nothing less than a wet dream for CTs. It'll never die. 100 years from now there will still be a 911 Twoof Movement. And 100 years after that. If you're a CT - then 911 is where you get to improve your moonbatting average by 50, 60 points in just a year or two.
 
Foolmewunz said:
[Curmudgeon Mode/] Guys, put these things in humor if you want to try to satirize these a**hats, okay? I've only been around for about six months, but this is already the third or fourth such attempt, all in different veins, but much the same result. There are a number of rather sharp knives in the drawers here, and the first cry of "fake" or "troll" is usually in the third or fourth post.

I'm an old geezer and I've been fighting with FDR conspiracists, and JFK conspiracists for years. This is not that far off from what one of those ilk could believe in.

If you want to post in CT and try your hand at humor, do as any number of vets here would do, and open with a line introducing it as such. Otherwise Humor is a far better venue. [/Curmudgeon Mode]
Click to expand...

Ahhh my apologies. My actual purpose was not humor though. If I was going for humor I would have used a completely different format. It was simply satire and an attempt to show that anything can be turned into a CT(I apparently failed at showing that though:( )
 
Foolmewunz said:
[Curmudgeon Mode/] Guys, put these things in humor if you want to try to satirize these a**hats, okay?
Click to expand...

Bah! Get stuffed. My 911 drinking game and proof that the Death Star was an inside job have already been tossed into humor and thus were completely lost. :mad:
 
Quad4_72 said:
Yes they would cause smoke but not the amount and color that is seen. It would have to have been done by pre-planted explosives. The type of munition used in the jets back then did not produce massive amounts of smoke, as seen in Pearl Harbor.
Click to expand...
It was a combination of Judy Wood's space beam, Steven Jones' thermite and a few well placed holograms.

:big:
 
Quad4_72 said:
Yes they would cause smoke but not the amount and color that is seen. It would have to have been done by pre-planted explosives. The type of munition used in the jets back then did not produce massive amounts of smoke, as seen in Pearl Harbor.
Click to expand...

Dude, these are black and white pictures...

ETA: ah, just noticed it was a gag...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom