• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

babazaroni said:
28th Kingdom,

Here is a google video that shows a close-up of the South Tower at the moment of collapse. See for yourself whether or not the upper part of the building starts it's downward movement before the squibs.

I don't have linking rights yet, so you may need to cut and paste the URL.

video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5405555553528290546&q=WTC&pl=true
Click to expand...

what the heck are squibs, and are your squibs with blood?
 
Projectile Vomiting as Irish field sport?

Its called HURLING - no joke !!!!
 
squibs

Beachnut, squibs is a term I've heard regarding the outward puffing of smoke/debris from the floors as the building collapses. Some folks think these squibs are from explosives while others think they are from compression.
 
babazaroni said:
Beachnut, squibs is a term I've heard regarding the outward puffing of smoke/debris from the floors as the building collapses. Some folks think these squibs are from explosives while others think they are from compression.
Click to expand...

I am sorry, I know the CT guy say squib for the air accelerating out the windows.

I know an explosion would have blown out many windows and the debris would decelerate, while the air was accelerating.

Squibs I have seen blow blood on actors, I thought.
 
beachnut said:
I am sorry, I know the CT guy say squib for the air accelerating out the windows.

I know an explosion would have blown out many windows and the debris would decelerate, while the air was accelerating.

Squibs I have seen blow blood on actors, I thought.
Click to expand...
yeah, before the CTers the only use of "squib" ive ever seen was to refer to putting gunshot wounds on actors (the quib makes a little puff of smoke or breaks a blood pack)
 
I regret using the term 'Squib'. It sure has detracted from the discussion.

28th Kingdom, look at the video linked by SkiBum in message #521, and give us your interpretation.
 
Last edited:
28th Kingdom said:
1 a : to cause to disperse or disappear : [SIZE=-1]DESTROY[/SIZE] <do not dissolve and deface the laws of charity -- Francis Bacon> b : to separate into component parts : [SIZE=-1]DISINTEGRATE[/SIZE] c : to bring to an end : [SIZE=-1]TERMINATE[/SIZE]

That's pretty good for me.
Click to expand...


I know it is. That's what's so sad about it.

The buildings did not disappear.
They did not separate into their component parts.
They did not dissolve.

The only word in there which suits your meaning is "destroy," and frankly, that's a much better word for it than "dissolve."

Unless you're just interested in pissing contests, I'd use destroy before dissolve. Save you a lot of arguments that could better be used on your position than on nit-picking one word to death.
 
babs, your post made a good point, which I'm sure 28K will ignore.

Your use of the term "squibs" was somewhat distracting, but only because they people who usually use the term are the conspiradroids who don't understand what a real squib is and don't understand how puffs of debris in the videos differ from real controlled demolition explosions. Usually if someone says the word "squib" it's a marker that he's gotten all his information from conspiracy sites.
 
babazaroni said:
I regret using the term 'Squib'. It sure has detracted from the discussion.
Click to expand...

no, the CT guy who started this thread was a distraction; your video is a good shot of the tower starting to fail due to loosing strength.

If the tower started to fail due to explosions we would see the explosions, but we see bending steel exterior and the start of 20 floors falling.
 
babazaroni said:
I regret using the term 'Squib'. It sure has detracted from the discussion.

28th Kingdom, look at the video linked by SkiBum in message #521, and give us your interpretation.
Click to expand...

28th is over on the steel fire and something thread not spreading facts if you like to spar with him
 
Here's the video:

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
 
28th Kingdom said:
...Now, each building crumbles into it's own footprint. Okay, so in the documented history of steel-structured skyscapers like the WTC towers...there has NEVER (I'm just letting you know, so you don't have to look it up) There has NEVER been a steel-structured skyscraper, that has COMPLETELY collapsed into it's footprint by virtue of a FIRE...
Click to expand...

Can you show me a video of a skyscraper the size of one of the WTC towers, that has had a jet smashed into the top of it, that has fallen differently than what looks like a controlled demolition?

Could you also be so kind as to set aside your belief that that the towers were brought down by controlled demolition for a moment and tell me how the towers SHOULD have fallen if explosives were not used?
 
Last edited:
28 IQ, in the history of steel-structured skyscrapers like the WTC towers, there has NEVER been one that was hit by a commercial airliner at full speed and with a large load of fuel, which stood for more than 90 minutes. NEVER.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
yeah, before the CTers the only use of "squib" ive ever seen was to refer to putting gunshot wounds on actors (the quib makes a little puff of smoke or breaks a blood pack)
Click to expand...


I alwaus found the "squib" thing a bit ironic, since a squib is obviously FAKE and designed to LOOK LIKE A BULLET HIT without actually being one.

So perhaps they say squib because they look like CD explosions, without being them.

-Gumboot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom