By the way, I only cursed at the guy in the beginning because, after I had corrected everything he had just said to the public, he brought up "NORAD's stand down," he refused to listen to my correction about that, and then he said he was proud of what he was saying. That really set me off. I'm surprised that people thought I was keeping my cool. I don't call people a-holes every day!
The cameraman and the two guys with the purple banner were from TruthMove.org, which only appears to have those three members. Another thing they edited out is them saying that I didn't know what I was talking about and me asking each of them to name a single thing I said that was wrong. Their reply: "I don't think we need to engage in that kind of thing." Right. No need to have evidence when you claim that someone is lying. I spend my entire time there correcting them, but no denier that I've encountered at Ground Zero has been able to tell me a single thing that I've gotten wrong.
They also chose not to include in the video my asking each truther (including those three) what NIST gave as the reasons for the tower collapses. Of course none of them have any idea, although their main argument at Ground Zero is that the towers couldn't have fallen the way they did without explosives.
This is as basic as it gets. If you're going to vehemently claim that a version of events is false, it helps to know what that version is. Not a single denier I've encountered at Ground Zero has ever known what the official version is!
