• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Translation: Since I was unable to complete high school, thanks to my own stupidity, I now am an unskilled day laborer, occasionally trusted with a piece of equipment - as long as inspectors aren't around.

One day the uneducated proletariat will rise up against those elitist trained and licensed, educated elite people things...

You don't know how wrong you are. The inspectors relax when I'm around because they know I have integrity and care about my work. It's the licensed contractors that are a problem. It's all about money for them so they are constantly cheating.

Engineers generally have a lot of integrity. Architects. watch 'em closely. Seriously.

I will not forget the Architect that used all graphic methods and indexed his overly of the street center line on the right of way ALL THE WAY through the project. When I went to layout the building the corner of the new house fell in the pool. The existing house was to be demoed, the pool to remain. The contractor and the architect would not let me tell the owner who was an engineer. I was working for the contractor and unfortunately did as he asked, but told the contractor that the engineer/owner would spot the relationships onthe opposite side of the structure after we moved the house to have the pool/house relationship the plan showed.

The contractor wouldn't believe me and the architect abandoned the project after I pointed out what he had done graphically. It went exactly as I said and the engineer spotted it. one day I arrived to find another survey company checking the retaining wall positions and realize the engineer had figured it out. All of the adjustments I had made including the 5 degree clockwise rotation of the structure the owner/engineer had requested were properly done within the given situation and the structure continued. There really wasn't much else that could be done, I realized this which was one reason I just did it.

I was paid. The Contractor and the architect fired. I only wish I had bouted them and their lack of integrity and told the engineer/owner what was going on before walls were set so he could have made the decisions himself. I figure I was paid because I had second guessed okay that he would have accepted the adjustments the contractor applied.

My experiences with 2 licensed, certified, elite individuals.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps some, but duly justified. But mostly common sense of a variety you've never encountered before.

Bullhocky. Are you saying that a university in England is in on an American cover up?

Also
Originally Posted by Christophera
Or, sombody very afraid of something but yet still wanting to contribute to the truth/fact finding and doing so but protecting themselves by posting on April fools day knowing people like you would compromise it.

Why would a prominant man with large company be afraid for his life? Why aren't all the people who post websites, supposedly exposing the conspiracy, dropping like flies?
Your reasoning makes no sense.



:
Steel core columns WILL NOT FALL (or not like that, unseen). Your point is meaningless.

Your argument is meaningless since the vast majority of the steel came down quickly. both internal core columns and box columns. How fast the steel fell has no bearing, or is proof in any way, that the core columns are elevator rail guides.
You are evading. Show me proof or admit your wrong.
 
hey chris here's an entity that may listen to you:-

TELL THESE PEOPLE

or perhaps you think they are controlled by bush rumsie condie et al as well?

go give it a try the world is waiting

BV
 
Could you please post some new pictures. You've been showing the same four or five for the past 200 pages. I suppose they're supposed to floor us all, but they really don't.

I'm not stupid enough to think that anything anyone could every possibly say will ever change your mind, because you're sure you know THE TRUTH, but at least show some different photographic evidence of STEEL REBAR and CONCRETE CORE and all those other capitalized things. You must have mountains of it, right?

You folks are so dense that you still haven't been able to deal reasonably with the meaning of the raw evidence of images posted.

Compared to the evidence you've got for the steel core columns, I've got mountains.
 
You folks are so dense that you still haven't been able to deal reasonably with the meaning of the raw evidence of images posted.

Compared to the evidence you've got for the steel core columns, I've got mountains.

Those images do not show what you think they do.

You've got ony one website and alot of erroneous and fabricated nonsense
 
Those images do not show what you think they do.

I tell you exactly what I think they do and that agrees with;

August Domel, Jr., Ph.D., S.E., P.E. November 2001
http://www.ncsea.com/downloads/wtcseerp.pdf

http://www.delta.tudelft.nl/archief/j33/n27/3664

Berenbak is now amazed that the two WTC towers didn't collapse immediately after the collisions. ''Apparently, the WTC had an enormous redundancy. Which other building could survive such a crash?'' The fireproof concrete core, hard as rock, probably prevented the building from coming down at once. Every Dutch building would have collapsed, he says, ''because we work with bearing outer walls.''


But you do not tell me what you think the images represent, or at least not in a reasonable, logical fashion

You've got ony one website and alot of erroneous and fabricated nonsense

You have no web site and no evidence and no reasonable explanation for the evidence I have which agrees with the statements of many uninterested parties.

You are wrong, ........ and you loose.
 
I would be so happy if everyone left this dog chasing it's tail cycle of "raw evidence".....it's been making me dizzy for months.
 
Go read the NIST report. http://wtc.nist.gov/

And your still evading the issue. Show me the proof that the interior columns were elevator rail guides.
Oh while your at it, show me Tony Jebson's concrete core.

You are supposed to SHOW how they came down not refer to the same old tired lies that explain nothing.

One image shows a h@ll of a lot more than Tony Jebson says should be there.

 
I just see a steel core with dust.

Can anyone tell us whey they do not see a concrete core?

there is no concrete core

That is not logical. There are no protruding column ends. With 47, supposed 1,300 foot steel column, it is NOT REASONABLE to think they would all break off uniformly and leave a smooth round shape.

It is not reasonable to assume that there would be no breaches of the drywall between the supposed core columns showing light through.
 
You are supposed to SHOW how they came down not refer to the same old tired lies that explain nothing.

One image shows a h@ll of a lot more than Tony Jebson says should be there.



Wot? No concrete?


attachment.php
 
I would be so happy if everyone left this dog chasing it's tail cycle of "raw evidence".....it's been making me dizzy for months.

This is a good test for the engine of this forum.

The concrete core and C4 in each floor of the WTC are far out, and when people are that far out it may be impossilbe to get them back to reality.

This has to be my last anti concrete core post, can Chris say the same for the pro core group of one

At least he is unique; could be a lot of other things, but he is unique

He has a page on the internet exposing his C4 floor plan, his wires are missing but he has the old C4 in the floor down, he needs to copyright that so he can get some movie deals when the CT nut case movie is made.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom