• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Jason Bermas Back-Pedelling.

Lyte Trip said:
Most likely they, like you, have no idea what is going to hit them.

But those posts were made as a mere precaution when the evidence was first obtained.

The plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

This we can prove and this will be something that NOBODY can debunk.
Click to expand...

Did AA77 hit the Pentagon?
If not, where are the passengers, crew and plane?
 
Lyte Trip said:
I can't speak for other people in the movement but here is what I believe.

None of the firefighters were in on it and Silverstein did not "order" the demolition but he did know about it.

High level federal operatives told the fire deptartment that their specialists had determined the building would collapse and to get their people out of the way.

Silverstein knew that it was an obvious demolition and made his famous quote to cover his butt so if it came back he could say....."they told me they were going to pull it.......I just said go ahead and do it".
Click to expand...

:dl:

That pot must be potent in California...
 
Bell said:
Did AA77 hit the Pentagon?
If not, where are the passengers, crew and plane?
Click to expand...

The evidence we will present will prove that the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

If you can demonstrate that it could still have knocked down the light poles and caused damage to the pentagon like this:

ASCEdamagepath.jpg


Then you don't have to join me in demanding an answer to your question from the USG.

Otherwise I've got a spare tinfoil hat waiting for you.
 
Bell said:
This 'pull it' claim has been debunked to death, troll.
Click to expand...

Yes; see Gravy's WTC7 document. Just a couple of points bear repeating;

1. The term "pull" is never used by firefighters to refer to demolition, and it's only used by demolitions experts to refer to physically pulling a building down with wires.

2. Silverstein stood to (and in fact did) lose a lot of money from the total loss of the building, not profit from it, thanks to a clause that required him to rebuild after any such loss.

3. It was the Fire Dept Commander who made the decision, not Silverstein. The authority here, and therfore the lion's share of any complicity here would with the FDNY, yet Silverstein cops it from the CT brigade because of his awkward use of language and the CTs assumptions about its significance.

As Bell said; totally debunked.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Most likely they, like you, have no idea what is going to hit them.

But those posts were made as a mere precaution when the evidence was first obtained.

The plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

This we can prove and this will be something that NOBODY can debunk.
Click to expand...

Sure! you have zip! Sure, like you have something?

So how did the light post get knocked down and why did the plane make a line of damage that lines up with the real witnesses of flight 77, and the real path of flight 77

How do you make this leap with your new stuff?

Way too many free dinners or too many dobbies? which is it

prove it now
 
Lyte Trip said:
The evidence we will present will prove that the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

If you can demonstrate that it could still have knocked down the light poles and caused damage to the pentagon like this:

[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/ASCEdamagepath.jpg[/qimg]

Then you don't have to join me in demanding an answer to your question from the USG.

Otherwise I've got a spare tinfoil hat waiting for you.
Click to expand...

Evading questions?

Again:

Did AA77 hit the Pentagon? Yes or no?
If not, where are the passengers, crew and plane?
 
Lyte Trip said:
The evidence we will present will prove that the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

If you can demonstrate that it could still have knocked down the light poles and caused damage to the pentagon like this:
Click to expand...

You are seriously trying to say that the plane hit the building from the North of Citgo but caused damage as if it came from the South, right? Is that your contention?
 
Big Les said:
Yes; see Gravy's WTC7 document. Just a couple of points bear repeating;

1. The term "pull" is never used by firefighters to refer to demolition, and it's only used by demolitions experts to refer to physically pulling a building down with wires.

2. Silverstein stood to (and in fact did) lose a lot of money from the total loss of the building, not profit from it, thanks to a clause that required him to rebuild after any such loss.

3. It was the Fire Dept Commander who made the decision, not Silverstein. The authority here, and therfore the lion's share of any complicity here would with the FDNY, yet Silverstein cops it from the CT brigade because of his awkward use of language and the CTs assumptions about its significance.

As Bell said; totally debunked.
Click to expand...

1. I never claimed the fire department said anything.

2. The building is brand new. He will not lose anything.

3. I don't agree. It was a national disaster of unmatched proportions. To suggest they took no direction from the feds is a stretch.
 
Lyte Trip said:
The evidence we will present will prove that the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

If you can demonstrate that it could still have knocked down the light poles and caused damage to the pentagon like this:

Then you don't have to join me in demanding an answer to your question from the USG.

Otherwise I've got a spare tinfoil hat waiting for you.
Click to expand...

We at the CDC believe you ate you tin-foil hat; but it was made of aluminum. You have been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease in its nuttier bar stage! You need to come immediately to Atlanta for the cure.

Yes Virginia there is a cure for terminal stupidity!

What are you really trying to say? (LCFC is total junk?)

What plane are you talking about? Please explain.
 
Lyte Trip said:
Most likely they, like you, have no idea what is going to hit them.

But those posts were made as a mere precaution when the evidence was first obtained.

The plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

This we can prove and this will be something that NOBODY can debunk.
Click to expand...

Yep I’m sure your youtube video will bring the mightiest democratically elected Government on the planet to its knees.

Nobody will need to debunk it because civilization as we know it come crumbling down and standing tall in the rubble will be Lyte Trip. The savoir of humanity and the one guy who survived attempt after attempt on his life to get his youtube video and DVD out on time from Xmas.

As if.
 
Bell said:
Evading questions?

Again:

Did AA77 hit the Pentagon? Yes or no?
If not, where are the passengers, crew and plane?
Click to expand...

Are all of you pseudoskeptics this slow?

1. No

2. I never claimed to know the answer to this nor is it my responsibility to explain. We can prove the plane didn't hit the building. The rest of the explaining will be the job of the USG.
 
Pardalis said:
So it came from the North and caused damage accordingly, or did it come from the South, and caused damage accordingly?

Which one?
Click to expand...

I guess you are all this slow.

It flew on the north side of the citgo therefore the damage had to be caused by something else.

Unless you can show how the same damage could be created from a plane on the north side of the citgo.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom