Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Big Al]

Perhaps they're really building it without a concrete core. CONSPIRACY!

Yeah, Jonny, I mentioned that several pages back and, of course, Chris ignored it. His answer to the other question was "Various reasons" - very helpful!

I'm not stupid enough to think that anything anyone could every possibly say will ever change your mind, because you're sure you know THE TRUTH, but at least show some different photographic evidence of STEEL REBAR and CONCRETE CORE and all those other capitalized things. You must have mountains of it, right?

Amen to that! I is gettin' sick of seeing the same stuff again and again.

 

[Christophera]

Could you please post some new pictures. You've been showing the same four or five for the past 200 pages. I suppose they're supposed to floor us all, but they really don't.

I'm not stupid enough to think that anything anyone could every possibly say will ever change your mind, because you're sure you know THE TRUTH, but at least show some different photographic evidence of STEEL REBAR and CONCRETE CORE and all those other capitalized things. You must have mountains of it, right?

I'm very sorry you are tired of real evidence. Considering you have none, it must be very frustrating.

Imagine how tired I am of trying over and over again to gain a reasonable recognition of facts, or logical explanation of them from people who persist in attempting to support a lie with no evidence what so ever.

 

[Big Al]

Chris,

I'll ask you again: WHY DID WHOEVER-IT-WAS THINK IT WAS A GREAT IDEA TO LINE THE WTC WITH EXPLOSIVES, 30 YEARS BEFORE BLOWING IT UP? JUST IN CASE A BUNCH OF RELIGIOUS FANATICS MIGHT CHOOSE TO CRASH A COUPLE OF PLANES INTO THEM?

WHY DID THEY EVEN EXPECT THE EXPLOSIVES TO WORK AFTER DOUBLE THEIR STORAGE LIFE?

DID THEY HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL OR SOMETHING?

Is this question unworthy of consideration, perhaps?

 

[JonnyFive]

I'm very sorry you are tired of real evidence. Considering you have none, it must be very frustrating.

Imagine how tired I am of trying over an over again to gain a reasonable recognition of facts, or logical explanation of them from people who persist in attempting to support a lie with no evidence what so ever.

I am not one of the presenters of evidence, I am one of the consumers of it.

Ah, but you get a special chance with people like me. We're not smarty man engineers, and we don't know much about structural faults or melting points or C4. You have a perfect chance to convince us with your excellent evidence.

Except your explanation isn't logical, or reasonable. It strikes me as bizzare, overly complicated, and nonsensical. Your evidence is weak, and the other side's evidence is strong. You haven't done a thing to prosecute those responsible for this monstrous act. Also, you are somehow still alive despite knowing THE TRUTH about this incredible conspiracy.

As I have mentioned in another thread, I know little about the physics or the structural elements of this thing. I am not an idiot, but I am not an expert either (which, by CT logic, may make me 200% more qualified to discuss those topics, but I disagree). However, I have done some study in the way that intelligence and law enforcement, as well as terrorism, work. As far as those elements of things go, the conspiracy theories simply aren't believable.

You need to do better than a couple photos to convince me of something that incredible. I will always trend towards the simplest explanation, unless given proof otherwise.

Think of me as electricity, I always follow the path of least resistance.


By the way Chris, if you know all this, why are you still alive? Your personal information is far too easy to get online (especially since you keep referring to your own web site as evidence), and I'm sure the government could easily silence you. Why haven't they? Why, if you know so much?

 

[bonavada]

BTW Bonavada, looks like the NWO got to your site before it got to Chris' - the choco-core site's down.

hah..........oops....seems a payment is due on the host of that.

found another place for now see below.

thanks for the heads up.

BV

 

[hcmom]

By the way Chris, if you know all this, why are you still alive? Your personal information is far too easy to get online (especially since you keep referring to your own web site as evidence), and I'm sure the government could easily silence you. Why haven't they? Why, if you know so much?

They're toying with him first...

 

[JonnyFive]

Hey bonavada, how come you're still alive? Are you really an NWO disinfo agent?

 

[JonnyFive]

They're toying with him first...

Oh, okay.

Run, Christophera, run for your life.

 

[hcmom]

Bonavada -- thank you so much for the fearlessness it must have taken to expose "THE TRUTH" like that!

 

[Christophera]

And BTW, I have copies of the master plan.

Oh that is a world class lie. YOU do not have access to no such thing.

Here is a photo taken of my copies of the master plans taken about 15 minutes ago on my humble drafting board.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtcplans1.JPG

The son of an architect who worked on the project sent them to me after consulting with a few 9-11 truth seekers to ask them who would be most trustworthy with them, and I was chosen to be the recipient.

After examining them I realized they were all but useless as they do not have any details on the core.

The one thing they are use for is proving the side of the towers were aligned in cardinal directions which proves the map in use on the FEMA or NIST site as well as Mapquest and topozone do not have the correct directions on the maps.

http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch1.pdf

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian/WTC/fig-1-3.jpg

http://www.topozone.com/map.asp?lat=40.71999&lon=-74.01348&datum=nad27&u=4&layer=DRG&size=l&s=24

http://www.mapquest.com/maps/map.ad...k&state=NY&zipcode=10007&country=US&geodiff=1

I corrected the FEMA map.

http://algoxy.com/psych/psyimages/sitelineWTCcore.gif

Your "expert professionals" have pulled the wool over your dumbed down eyes. Get out of your cave.

 

[Christophera]

They're toying with him first...

The US government is actually filled with many dedicated people. The infiltration which you support has it all messed up.

Ideally the US government is prevented from doing 9-11 or messing with me for exposing the truth, if it is a lawfull entity.

Do you like it being unlawful, infiltrated and disposing of the Constitution?

 

[Bell]

Here is a photo taken of my copies of the master plans taken about 15 minutes ago on my humble drafting board.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtcplans1.JPG

The son of an architect sent them to me after consulting with a few 9-11 truth seekers to ask them who would be most trustworthy with them, and I was chosen to be the recipient.

After examining them I realized they were all but useless as they do not have any details on the core.

I doubt he figured you were the most trustworthy. Most nutworthy maybe.

Maybe he hoped that showing you the drawings of the REAL towers, could proof to you the towers didn't had a concrete core. Silly him.

 

[Bell]

I corrected the FEMA map.

Apply for a job here.

 

[The Almond]

After examining them I realized they were all but useless as they do not have any details on the core.

Quoted for posterity. In the face of actual, copyrighted evidence showing that the concrete core you describe does not exist, you've decided to discount the evidence simply because it does not support your theory. Astounding.

 

[bonavada]

Here is a photo taken of my copies of the master plans taken about 15 minutes ago on my humble drafting board.

<snip>

After examining them I realized they were all but useless as they do not have any details on the core.

this is better than friggin BORAT...........

BV

 

[Big Al]

Hey bonavada, how come you're still alive? Are you really an NWO disinfo agent?

<evil laugh>

No, insect, I AM! I know where you live, your favourite colour, your pastimes and your sordid little personal preferences!

It is I who sent you all those threatening emails telling you to deny the lambent truth of Chris's patently undeniable photos! It is I who forced you and everybody else, trembling, to deny the eye-blisteringly self-evident concrete core, even though you long to tell the truth and admit you are convinced.

Just remember that I know how much you love your little Shitzu, Bonzo. Keep your mouth shut and you will never need to find him fricasseed on your front porch.

Big Al, A.K.A. Dr. Destructo.

 

[hcmom]

The US government is actually filled with many dedicated people. The infiltration which you support has it all messed up.

Chris, find a post of mine, anywhere, that indicates that I support whatever it is you think I do.

Do you like it being unlawful, infiltrated...

None of your business!

 

[Christophera]

Quoted for posterity. In the face of actual, copyrighted evidence showing that the concrete core you describe does not exist, you've decided to discount the evidence simply because it does not support your theory. Astounding.

They do not have any core shown at all. Not even one of the 3 different floor plans for the core that are in circulation.

Which indicates a big fat lie, which you folks support.

How does it feel to help with the demise of the US Constitution?

 

[Bell]

They do not have any core shown at all. Not even one of the 3 different floor plans for the core that are in circulation.

Which indicates a big fat lie, which you folks support.

How does it feel to help with the demise of the US Constitution?

How does it feel to stand by and do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to bring the perpetrators to court? You're a hypocrite.

 

[Architect]

While I don't have any use for BYU (they get special dispensation from the NCAA for missions, fer cryin' out loud! ), not Michigan, nor USC, nor Notre Dame, by all definitions and criteria, BYU is indeed/b] a proper university--complete with eccentric professors (and former profsesors).
Dadblamed UKers always have to bash us, one way or another. Respect is a 2-way street, fella! Like Oxford doesn't have its share of wierdo's?

Yea, right. I'd respond to that but it takes us into the realms of politics and religion. Lets just say that BYU has entrance and conduct policies which would be criminally illegal in the EC, and lets also note that neither politics or religion has any place in defining the curriculum of higher education.