Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[tsig]

RAW Booty

Can you prove that with raw images of the towers coming down.

Why yes you have put them out there all the time.

 

[Christophera]

Then that must mean that your entire theory is false.

No, it means when buildings that are built to be demolished they look different than when they are not.

Like this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4245&stc=1&d=1164422417

 

[Christophera]

Chris, if you're not going to do anything with your evidence for 3,000 murders, all of this looks more and more like your hobby. I find that extrememly disrespectful to the victims. So, are you just messing around or are you going to actually do something to bring the perpetrators to justice?

I'm gettin information to the American public so they can create justice.

Are you trying to impede me?

 

[tsig]

The engineers believe FEMAs description of the structure and I know it was different so what the engineers have defined is in error.

Is there any web site that uses raw images of the towers coming down to define the structural elements of the them.

You know it is different than the engineers? Are you a shill? You must be if you know the design. Watch carefully the MIB are close behind.

 

[maccy]

For anybody that's interested, if you go to your "User CP" and click on "Edit Options" and scroll down to "Thread Display Options" there's a section with the title "Hide threads by Members on your Ignore List" this is what it says:

Setting this to "Yes" will completely hide any threads started by any Member(s) you have placed on your ignore list. (Links to hidden threads will still work and they will still appear in any searches.)

People who feel they shouldn't be here and yet they can't resist may want to consider using this feature.

 

[tsig]

So you have no actual training in construction technology, structural engineering, etc?

Well, that certainly qualifies you as an expert in why the WTC buildings collapsed on that day...

Funny how no actual experts have problems w/ the NIST reports. Oh yeah, they were all paid off.

Everybody is just pissing in thier pants afraid. Don't you get it

 

[tsig]

I'm gettin information to the American public so they can create justice.

Are you trying to impede me?

We and the and the American people are one so talk to me.

 

[firecoins]

Fireloins,

You are commenting a little early, I have not yet answered powa's post which mistates my post.

- there is no justice system left (No civil justice w/regard to citizens correcting goverments neglect, corruption or malfeasance.

- the media are all in on it (probably not 100%, but close to it)

- no one sees the truth because we are all a) too afraid to see it, b)hypnotized in order not to see it and c) brainwashed by the education system.(You generalize with the term "all too afraid to see it". b)you are in error. c) you have correct.

Commenting early? what page is this?

Yes I am sure we are hypnotized into seeing a steel core where a steel core was built. I was brainwashed into looking at evidence. I am afraid you have yet to present a bit of reality. I can see through your arguments and because of the hypnotism I can see right through you.

 

[Christophera]

Chris I might join your team if I had any idea what game you are playing.

Well, its' not a game. It does have its rewards in knowing that you're are working for the right ends with real information.

And, realisitically we are really, for the most part on the same team, but the presence of false information has us working against each other. You are already involved, and, if your post is sincere, you've seen that I'm working with real information applied to an independant, comprehensive, feasible and realistic explantion for what happened to the towers, and have realized that working without real information is a losing proposition in many ways.

 

[Christophera]

Commenting early? what page is this?

Yes I am sure we are hypnotized into seeing a steel core where a steel core was built. I was brainwashed into looking at evidence. I am afraid you have yet to present a bit of reality. I can see through your arguments and because of the hypnotism I can see right through you.

So you BELIEVE in the 47, 1300 foot steel core columns but can produce no evidence from raw sources of images to support their existence.

I'm glad you realize you were hypnotized into believing that the inadequate, contradictory drawings presented by FEMA. I'm very sorry that you cannot recognize reality yet.

Try thinking about a Concrete shear wall, you are looking at an end view which is to the left of an interior box column, the "spire" that is actually holding up the spire.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4246&stc=1&d=1164429257

 

[Garb]

So you BELIEVE in the 47, 1300 foot steel core columns but can produce no evidence from raw sources of images to support their existence.

I'm glad you realize you were hypnotized into believing that the inadequate, contradictory drawings presented by FEMA. I'm very sorry that you cannot recognize reality yet.

Try thinking about a Concrete shear wall, you are looking at an end view which is to the left of an interior box column, the "spire" that is actually holding up the spire.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4246&stc=1&d=1164429257

Images are not raw sources.


Stop saying that.

 

[Z]

Images are not raw sources.


Stop saying that.

Nor did the towers fall at 'near free fall'.

Nor was there 'total pulverisation'.

Nor does C-4 - or any plastic explosive - last long enough to have been built into the structure in the late 1960s.

Nor does C-4 remain effective when mixed with solvent. In fact, creating a slurry like you suggest would result in a useless, inert paste.

Nor was there any time whatsoever to plant sufficient explosives to create the 9-11 effect.

Nor is there any such thing as 3" rebar. Nonexistant. Never been made. Never been used. End of story.

Ergo, your website does not, in fact, contain a feasible, realistic explanation for anything. First, there's nothing unusual to explain; second, your explanations require the existence of a) a nonexistant documentary; b) chemical explosives that don't exist; and c) all new laws of physics.

But we've been through all that before.

Considering that this tiny website hardly reaches any public at all, your claims of trying to get the info to the public are bullsquat too.

So what are you going to do with this information?

 

[Christophera]

We and the and the American people are one so talk to me.

That is what I've been doing, and showng you raw evidence in the form of images of the towers.

Understanding the structures that actually stood is the first past of the information that Americans need.

This IMAGE of the WTC core shows us something which is absolute. The total abcense of protruding steel core columns is substantial evidence that the steel core columns did not exist. Combined with other images that also do not show the steel core columns, it fully discounts the FEMA assertion of 47 1,300 foot steel columns existing in the core area.

We know the tower had a core.

The linked IMAGE shows the core and that material, of all the materials that might be there, can only be concrete because only concrete would survive the massive loads crashing around it to stand with that rounded shape.

It may seem simplistic and counter to all of your tendancies, but concrete is evidenced and the steel core columns are not. The only support they have are a few drawings of a core floor plan that happen to differ from each other, and the statements found an multiple web sites that "there were 47, steel columns in the core." Those sites NEVER offer competant raw evidence of images from the demolition which DO expose the tower structures quite completely.

 

[Christophera]

Nor did the towers fall at 'near free fall'.

Nor was there 'total pulverisation'.

Nor does C-4 - or any plastic explosive - last long enough to have been built into the structure in the late 1960s.

Nor does C-4 remain effective when mixed with solvent. In fact, creating a slurry like you suggest would result in a useless, inert paste.

Nor was there any time whatsoever to plant sufficient explosives to create the 9-11 effect.

Nor is there any such thing as 3" rebar. Nonexistant. Never been made. Never been used. End of story.

Ergo, your website does not, in fact, contain a feasible, realistic explanation for anything. First, there's nothing unusual to explain; second, your explanations require the existence of a) a nonexistant documentary; b) chemical explosives that don't exist; and c) all new laws of physics.

But we've been through all that before.

Considering that this tiny website hardly reaches any public at all, your claims of trying to get the info to the public are bullsquat too.

So what are you going to do with this information?

You have the below correct. Otherwise you have everything else almost exactly wrong, backwards. Congratulations!

"Nor was there any time whatsoever to plant sufficient explosives to create the 9-11 effect."

"But we've been through all that before."

It is being put to use right now for the American people whom you have no reason to give a squat for ever.

 

[twinstead]

You have the below correct. Otherwise you have everything else almost exactly wrong, backwards. Congratulations!

BS he has a point and you know it.

Don't just say he has everything else wrong. PROVE IT.

 

[delphi_ote]

It was a valiant effort, but the cores ore irrevalnt. Thanks, but the monster will consume us all. NEVER>>>NEVETR

You were supposed to run. I gave you a chance with my distraction. My sacrifice means nothing now!

 

[delphi_ote]

To the brave souls that battle on.....

[qimg]http://cache.kotaku.com/gaming/elrond-kl.jpg[/qimg]

´Why do you linger here when there is no hope?´

I tried to pull one of these moves:

but everyone stood around gawking.

Let's try it again, shall we?

Hey, Chris. Do you think you could post more images of the concrete core?

FLY YOU FOOLS!

 

[Christophera]

Hey, Chris. Do you think you could post more images of the concrete core?

Well, ....... okay, one more. But you kids have really had enough reality for tonight, I can tell. Time for bed now.

Imagine a mighty tower with a concrete core 1,300 feet tall, 17 foot thick walls at the base and 2 foot thick at the top. Here is a picture of the top of the core inside the outer walls falling onto WTC 3. Poor little #3, it gets badly squished.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4247&stc=1&d=1164435081

 

[hcmom]

Well, ....... okay, one more. But you kids have really had enough reality for tonight, I can tell. Time for bed now.

Imagine a mighty tower with a concrete core 1,300 feet tall, 17 foot thick walls at the base and 2 foot thick at the top. Here is a picture of the top of the core inside the outer walls falling onto WTC 3. Poor little #3, it gets badly squished.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=4247&stc=1&d=1164435081

Dang it Chris, would you please knock it off with the occasional intentional funny?!

I really have better things to do, but I read through here every day, just to get a glimpse of that...

Ok, I don't really have anything better to do. But still...

 

[delphi_ote]

But you kids have really had enough reality for tonight, I can tell...