• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know I don't have the socks. I think they may have been lost in the dryer.

I'm going to try a different tack here. Everyone here is just repeating themselves - especially Christophera, (Chris, please don't post those pictures anymore as we have all seen them). Let's see if we can approach this from a different angle. I want to see if we can ask questions that will make Christophera give us something we have not heard already.

Christophera, when someone is right about something it's usually pretty easy to convince others you are right, especially when the people who you are trying to convince are more than willing to look at your evidence. People here have looked at your evidence, (again, please don't post it yet another time - we've all seen it), and you have failed to convince anyone here. Why do you think that is? Why do you think everyone here is more willing to accept alternate explinations for the pictures you have posted than what you say they represent?
 
I know I don't have the socks. I think they may have been lost in the dryer.
Get Bob_Kark in here. If anyone can them, it's my best person of hench!
Why do you think everyone here is more willing to accept alternate explinations for the pictures you have posted than what you say they represent?
I'll second this question. Why don't we see it Chris? Why do we see steel core columns plain as day in the video?
 
... Why do we see steel core columns plain as day in the video?

You ask it like that and you are just going to get him to repeat himself again! Yes, it's fun to make the monkey jump, but I want to see if I can get something new and different from him.
 
Didn't you admit that NOTHING could convince you ?
Yes, Chris did say that, but it was patently obvious long before he made the statement. I think he should be taken at his word.

That's why arguing with him is a fruitless pursuit, and possibly only reinforces his "look how successfully I'm battling everyone who's against me" paranoia.

I think it's important to remember that there is no "concrete core" movement out there. Christophera is the only person in the world who you're trying to convince, and that's not going to happen. You're arguing with a sole person who has a personal, unchangeable delusion.

If a mentally ill person stood at a streetcorner near you and spouted the same delusional gibberish every day, would you stand there every single day and argue?



ETA: the recent posts make it seem as if this 18-minute video issue is new to Chris. It isn't.
 
Last edited:
That's why I'm not trying to argue with him. I want to try to get him to answer some other questions. I'm trying to get him to think.
 
You ask it like that and you are just going to get him to repeat himself again! Yes, it's fun to make the monkey jump, but I want to see if I can get something new and different from him.
I thought I was basically asking the same question you were. Why do we see one thing and he sees another?
 
That's why I'm not trying to argue with him. I want to try to get him to answer some other questions. I'm trying to get him to think.
I understand completely. Ed knows I've put in my time here trying to do the same. But 6 months and nearly 8,000 posts into this thread, I think it's clear that we're not going to cure Chris of his illness.

Does anyone disagree?

Does anyone think that Chris is wrong when he says that nothing will change his mind?
 
I understand completely. Ed knows I've put in my time here trying to do the same. But 6 months and nearly 8,000 posts into this thread, I think it's clear that we're not going to cure Chris of his illness.

Does anyone disagree?

Does anyone think that Chris is wrong when he says that nothing will change his mind?
At this point, I'm just in it for the stories. He's the Picasso of excuses.

ETA But still not as good as a ninja.
 

Attachments

  • wherethefisit.jpg
    wherethefisit.jpg
    42.6 KB · Views: 8
Ooooh, I know, I know.

ChristopherA already has court room experience. Please consider following this llink if you haven't already:

http://algoxy.com/missingknowledge/220trans0.html

Please read the entire transcript. I found it most enlightening.

Yes, I have. I guess the transcript doesn't include all the laughters by the judge, jury, bailiff and audience? That would take up twice as much space.
 
Chris, why are you here instead of taking your "obvious", "common sense", "undeniable" evidence to the highest courts in the land?

I'm not American. I don't work for the US Government, the Illuminati, the New World Order, and I haven't been offered multi-million bribes to keep my mouth shut.

I saw the towers fall on the 11th September, 2001 via the Internet in England. It was the most heinous, shocking, horrifying act of evil I have ever seen or want to see, I'd cheerfully strangle the guys that did it with my bare hands, if I didn't know they died in the act.

I'm an engineer, and I KNOW you have talked the biggest load of garbage I have ever heard. You argue for the sake of arguing, and your words are empty, vacuous and irritating.

You KNOW so much, but you can't back up what you say with more than "it's obvious".

It AIN'T obvious to me, or anyone else here. Put up or shut up. You are a know-nothing troll who gets his kicks out of talking crap about a serious crime.

If you really believe the U.S. Government, the CIA or any other U.S. official body is behind it, you shouldn't be wasting your time telling us, you should be telling the authorities. If you go public with "undeniable" evidence, somebody will take the case on. Send all the "evidence" to the newspapers under a pseudonym if you're scared that you'll be rubbed out.

Still, you won't. You don't believe this. You're just arguing for the sake of it. This is a bloody joke.
 
I thought I was basically asking the same question you were. Why do we see one thing and he sees another?

You were asking the same thing, it's just the wording. By bringing up the steel core you are inviting him to post that damn picture again and start talking about the core. I want him to discuss why he thinks no one believes his "evidence".
 
This video has the :socks:

Seriously. Readily available footage of the steel columns through the entire construction of the towers. What more could we possibly ask? Short of constructing a time machine, nothing more readily shows how utterly wrong Chris is. He now has to argue with his own eyes. No other point or question could possibly make him look more foolish than video evidence against his claim.

We're done here, Chris. You're wrong. Totally wrong. No concrete core. Watch the video. It's really that simple.

I admit I'm mostly quoting this post so I can also repost the following and go:

WHOOP, WHOOP; NUTTER ALERT!!!

But the quote above is a very valid thing to quote. I suggest that anyone replying to this thread in future simply quotes a similar post referring to that video, as it destroys Chris' argument completely. The other option is to deny him the oxygen of attention and stop replying, which is what I'm about to test my willpower with.
 
I know I don't have the socks. I think they may have been lost in the dryer.

I'm going to try a different tack here. Everyone here is just repeating themselves - especially Christophera, (Chris, please don't post those pictures anymore as we have all seen them). Let's see if we can approach this from a different angle. I want to see if we can ask questions that will make Christophera give us something we have not heard already.

Christophera, when someone is right about something it's usually pretty easy to convince others you are right, especially when the people who you are trying to convince are more than willing to look at your evidence. People here have looked at your evidence, (again, please don't post it yet another time - we've all seen it), and you have failed to convince anyone here. Why do you think that is? Why do you think everyone here is more willing to accept alternate explinations for the pictures you have posted than what you say they represent?

It is very simple, they do not want to know the truth.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html
 
I admit I'm mostly quoting this post so I can also repost the following and go:

WHOOP, WHOOP; NUTTER ALERT!!!

But the quote above is a very valid thing to quote. I suggest that anyone replying to this thread in future simply quotes a similar post referring to that video, as it destroys Chris' argument completely. The other option is to deny him the oxygen of attention and stop replying, which is what I'm about to test my willpower with.

One image destroys the video misrepresentation/misinterpretation.

If the 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns existed they would be seen protruding from the center of the WTC 2 core. They are not so therefore did not exist.

The demo image expose the true structure in a way that construction phoots never made possible. What is seen in the core area in the construction aerial photos are elevator guide rail supports which fell immediately as soon as debris from above crashed down the core which was a hollow concrete tube.
 
Chris, why are you here instead of taking your "obvious", "common sense", "undeniable" evidence to the highest courts in the land?

You are obviously uninformed. The Americans have relinquished their courts of law and no longer require a Constitution. They now have TV.
 
You were asking the same thing, it's just the wording. By bringing up the steel core you are inviting him to post that damn picture again and start talking about the core. I want him to discuss why he thinks no one believes his "evidence".
Ah. Sorry. :boxedin:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom