ill second that.Paul Daniels gets more entertainment out of a cup and a ball than most magicians can dream of.
I don't think it's an over exaggeration to say he is one of the best entertainers.
the magician who fools you or the one who fools you best? Who would like a magician who does not fool you at all?as for my favorite magicians, who ever fools me the best
And bizarrely you didn't even include David Blaine or David Copperfield. What is it with magical Davids? (I grew up on David Nixon).David Williamson
Ricky Jay who was directed by David Mamet
David Roth
David Regal
It seems I have a predispostion to people named David.
firecoins, the point was that nobody could see how it was done. They were skeptics who were "fooled", but they weren't "fooled" to the extent of really believing that real magic was involved, whether they were magicians or not.but were they magicians? Skeptic, as skeptical as they are, are not fluent in the methods & can still be fooled.
my point being skeptics are in no way harder to fool by good magicians.firecoins, the point was that nobody could see how it was done. They were skeptics who were "fooled", but they weren't "fooled" to the extent of really believing that real magic was involved, whether they were magicians or not.
It already has. Magicians use cell phones in tricks, to reveal things like selected cards.Is anybody using a cell phone as a prop in a demonstration of psychic ability? What activities/behaviors would freak people out? "Put your phone in the lead box, it rings by itself... or "here's an unprogrammed phone, it will now call your number"... if you can freak anyone out with a cell phone, without detection of method, you will be a Freak Master.
Problem with that is that everybody is so used to having these things that nothing too weird seems "magic" any more. Action at a distance is commonplace, now. Some bitchin' magician will figure out something, though.
It already has. Magicians use cell phones in tricks, to reveal things like selected cards.
the magician who fools you or the one who fools you best? Who would like a magician who does not fool you at all?
yes. that is certainly true.I enjoy any well done magic act, even the guy that does the linking rings at a kids birthday party. Yeah, I know how it's done, but good stagecraft, engaging and original patter, and the indefinable ability to pull an audience along is very entertaining to watch, and even get caught up in.
Banachek came up with P&T's method which they used with his permission. It was originally something he was doing. P&T came up with their own presentation.Agreed, conjuring is more than a method, it's a real-time (phenomenological, socially constructed) experience. None of its elements are more important than the other, but like a three-legged stool stands sturdily on all.
I didn't know Banachek worked out the bullet catch for/with P&T. It's damned impressive, mystifying, scary, but still safe (I told myself, why have these guys done this happily 6 shows a week and no end in sight, if it was so darned "iffy"???). But the magic stool held, I found myself squinting and cringing as they were about to pull triggers.