• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christophera said:
The north tower was hit on the north side and the top fell south.

The south tower was hit on the south east corner and the body fell east while the top fell west.

This has been studied and confirmed years ago.
Click to expand...

you've been proved wrong.
http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-6.pdf
Read page 56
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2108878&postcount=7778
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2109455&postcount=7792

Looks like your unwillingness to use evidence is exposing you.

Wrong, I just used your 1st diagram twice because it looked more like WTC 1 than 2 as it was labeled. There are bigger issues than that tho.

You have not explained why the top of WTC 2 went west. And of course this image proves the concrete core, ONE MORE TIME.
Click to expand...
Wrong again, thw top of WTC2 fell to the east by south east.
http://wtc.nist.gov/NISTNCSTAR1-6.pdf
Read page 56
"There was aproximately a 3 to 4 degree tilt to the south and a 7 to 8 degree tilt to the east prior to significant downward movement of the upper building section."

The conspicous lack of links gives your lie away.
Click to expand...
Oh my, how you convienently forget things. let me refresh your memory
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2090420&postcount=7319
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2033615&postcount=6032
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1956562&postcount=4315
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2027988&postcount=5755

This is a concrete shear wall holding up the stpire which is formed by an interior box column. NOTICE: No core columns in the core area to the left.

Then, the legendary WTC 2 concrete core.

And what about the 17 foot thick concrete core wall at its base AGAIN, no steel core columns where they should be, like protruding from the stairwell, right of the stairwell, in the fore ground..
Click to expand...
Chris those pictures do not show what you think they show. You interpretations have been repeatedly debunked. Just review this whole thread. But then you have a very selective memory, only remembering the things you want to and inventing the rest.
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
You imply you've read the entire thread which is a lie because I've stated that the core was tapered from 17 foot to 2 foot at least twice.
Click to expand...
And yet, I had to ask the question 4 times to get you to respond. Why didn't you just post a link or respond immediately? And I never said I read the entire thread, skimmed it would be a better word.
I know it from the 1990 docuemntary called "Constrcution of the Twin Towers", and, it makes sense that a wall that tall would be tapered.
Click to expand...
Not if that wall were a shear wall. If it were a gravity load supporting wall, it would make perfect sense to taper it. But then you'd have to answer the question of where the shear support was coming from. You'd have to admit the presence of steel. Once you admit that there was steel on the outside of the building to act as shear support, we return to the concrete wall to determine if it was strong enough to support the gravity load at the top of the building. I'll spare you the math, but it's not sufficient unless you account for 47 interior steel columns as reported by the designers, contractors, NIST and the ASCE.
I don't need to reconcile anything
Click to expand...
Why not? Are you not attempting to produce a coherent, logical argument? If you're making contradictory statements, are you not responsible for reconciling them in an attempt to produce a better argument?
if youcannot show images of the supposed 47, 1,300 foot steeel core columns from images of the demolition.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to show images. I'm going to show mathematical proof for 47 interior columns and show that they were necessary for the structural integrity of the building. To put it a different way, I need you to produce an image of a photon, an atom, a proton and a neutron in order to prove that they exist. Also, I need photographs for Julius Ceasar and ones showing the Norman Invasion of 1066.
How about a realistic explanation fo near free fall and near total pulverization.
Click to expand...

If you intend to continue with this childish nay-saying and redirection, we can do that, too. Are you going to respond to my points, or are you going to simply plug your ears and hum while I explain them to everyone else?
 
Chris, why don't you accept the fact that nobody here will ever agree with your views? Why don't you just move on?
 
Christophera said:
I do not even have to prove that 3,000 captial crimes did not recieve due process and that evidence was removed from the scene to be destroyed.
Click to expand...
So what is the problem here? You don't believe you have to present evidence when you make accusations. Shouldn't you be happy living under the imaginary police state you rant about so much? Your standards of evidence are the same.
 
Pardalis said:
Chris, why don't you accept the fact that nobody here will ever agree with your views? Why don't you just move on?
Click to expand...
I'd be willing to eat crow and agree with his views if he presented a logical case and backed it up with evidence.

Oh. Right. I'll never agree with his views.
 
Christophera said:
I know it from the 1990 docuemntary called "Constrcution of the Twin Towers", and, it makes sense that a wall that tall would be tapered..
Click to expand...

Just in passing, I'll point out that there is no evidence that this documentary ever existed.
 
Chris, if you are afraid of your government, why don't you just move to another country? (preferably not Canada)

Wouldn't that solve all of your problems?
 
delphi_ote said:
Do a Google search for:

"The Construction of the Twin Towers" AND 1990 AND documentary

All that comes up is Chris posting on other forums.
Click to expand...

He claims that the government erased all knowledge of the documentary, except for his famous photographic memory and replaced all tv guides time period.
 
uruk said:
Still avoiding the truth. Your using your typical tatic of changing the subject.
Click to expand...

What I'm doing is provin your subject is bogus and that you do not know wnough about it ti apply substancial questions.

If this is not true then produce images of the supposed 47, 1,300 foot steel core columns.

I have no problem producing images of the concrete core so therefore my disqualifying your question is only logical.

Besides, logically the notion that 47, 1300 foot steel columns could actually be cut as many times as needed or fail within what we saw is strictly incredible.
 
maccy said:
Just in passing, I'll point out that there is no evidence that this documentary ever existed.
Click to expand...

As I watched WTC 1 fall on 9-11 I KNEW the documentary would be gone as well as all reference to it.

Logically anybody that can build a 1,300 foot tower to demolish and do it secretly can easily remove an 11 year old video tape and record of it.
 
Christophera said:
Logically anybody that can build a 1,300 foot tower to demolish and do it secretly can easily remove an 11 year old video tape and record of it.
Click to expand...
You really don't understand how the Internet works, do you? :rolleyes: Do you really think someone can erase something on countless servers across the world?
 
Last edited:
Christophera said:
I believe the US government has bee infiltrated using hypsosis throught he intelligence communities.
Click to expand...

Big Les said:
I'm covered in bees!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You are out of your mind, my friend. Seek help.
Click to expand...

I really did think when I first read what Chris wrote that he was now disclosing a hypnosis technique using bees...

I'm hoping it's just a typo.
 
Christophera said:
As I watched WTC 1 fall on 9-11 I KNEW the documentary would be gone as well as all reference to it.

Logically anybody that can build a 1,300 foot tower to demolish and do it secretly can easily remove an 11 year old video tape and record of it.
Click to expand...

OMG how circular can you get Chris? You haven't proved anybody demolished anything, yet are using that 'fact' to declare those same people removed an 11 year old tape.

Chris, I like you better when you are just crazy, not crazy AND stupid, okay?
 
OK, I've missed it somewhere... who has the socks now?

If no one else has them, I'll take a stab:

Chris:

Do you honestly think a 1300-ft long steel beam can be created in such a manner that it can stand vertically, unsupported, without shattering?

:socks: (provisional)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom