Has Anyone Seen A Realistice Explanation For Free Fall Of The Towers?

[Oliver]

It will suffice under conditions.

Under which conditions? Please specify!

Steel will not get significantly heated under those conditions to fail inthe way image show.

So how hot was the steel in Tower 1, 2 and WTC7???

Do you approve of inflitrations of governments and their lawless performance?

No, i don`t because many people who are NOT members
of the NWO or the GOV should have seen any strange
operations at the buildings.

 

[maccy]

If you do not have a leg to stand on, what do you need socks for?

You put a tangerine in them at Christmas.

 

[bonavada]

Great! I'll take the socks then.
Mr. Brown,
You claim that the towers fell in the wrong order. How can you say so when the second jet impacted WTC2 faster (and therefore harder) than the first jet hit WTC1, and did so at a point lower on the building in comparison to the first?

how about a direct answer to this question chris?

BV

 

[Oliver]

supression is a noun used to denote the results of the verb "to supress", in this case in the following meaning:
http://www.webster.com/dictionary/suppress

also

http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=suppression

*lol* Okay, you and he meant suppress with two "p"´s... Sorry,
sometimes it´s hard to translate the misspelling...

 

[bonavada]

You put a tangerine in them at Christmas.

jeez that takes me back along time. i'm filling up here mate :-]

tangerines an apple and a handful of sweets...i always used to wonder where santa kept all those socks. musta been some sweet smelling sleigh.........

BV

 

[maccy]

We're getting off target, again.

Here is what has been established so far by asking Chris one question at a time and sticking with it:

it is so far established:-

that there was no "free-fall of the towers". christophera has no real idea at all of rate of fall of the towers.

that there was "no pulverisation of the towers" as large chunks of concrete and other parts of the structures remained.

christophera does not know the weight of the upper floors of the towers but still insists, whatever the weight was, it wasn't enough to cause the collapse.

Here is the question that we are supposed to be sticking to now.

Great! I'll take the socks then.

Mr. Brown,

You claim that the towers fell in the wrong order. How can you say so when the second jet impacted WTC2 faster (and therefore harder) than the first jet hit WTC1, and did so at a point lower on the building in comparison to the first?

Please don't ask any further questions until Regnad Kcin has indicated that s/he satisfied with Chris' answers to this question.

 

[beachnut]

Maxim:
If a suppossed explantion does not explain the event, it is not the truth. No explanation that does not explain the event can be the truth.

So far no explanation in existence explains free fall and total pulverization of the towers appears to exist. Has anyone seen one?

You have been waiting for a long time and the answer is;

NO, the buildings did fall; but there was not total pulverization.

No, you can not answer the question because it did not happen, end of thread, end of question.

No ---- because there was not total pulverizaton.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

Mr. Brown:

You claim that the World Trade Center towers fell in the wrong order. How can you say this when the second jet impacted WTC2 faster (and therefore harder) than the first jet hit WTC1, and did so at a point lower on the building in comparison to the first?

And a quick refresher: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:World_Trade_Center_9-11_Att.png

- Both planes were identical models
- WTC1 was struck at 490 mph
- There were 11 undamaged stories above WTC1's impact zone
- WTC2 was struck at 590 mph
- There were 25 undamaged stories above WTC2's impact zone

In short, the second tower was hit significantly harder, significantly lower, and fell after a shorter elapsed time, yet you, Mr. Brown, insist it should've fallen second. How can this be?

 

[Christophera]

Mr. Brown:

You claim that the World Trade Center towers fell in the wrong order. How can you say this when the second jet impacted WTC2 faster (and therefore harder) than the first jet hit WTC1, and did so at a point lower on the building in comparison to the first?

And a quick refresher: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:World_Trade_Center_9-11_Att.png

- Both planes were identical models
- WTC1 was struck at 490 mph
- There were 11 undamaged stories above WTC1's impact zone
- WTC2 was struck at 590 mph
- There were 25 undamaged stories above WTC2's impact zone

In short, the second tower was hit significantly harder, significantly lower, and fell after a shorter elapsed time, yet you, Mr. Brown, insist it should've fallen second. How can this be?

Your explanation for why the wrong tower fell first is about as bad as your explanation for why they both fell the wrong way. Actually you never did explain why WTC 2 fell the wrong way and never did explain why the body fo WTC 2 went east while the top went west.

Basically you and your bsufucating group are trying to cover your evasion with repetitive questioning,

Explain why the top of WTC 2 went west and the body went east. BTW, the concrete core is easily seen inside the perimeter columns just before connecting with WTC 3.

 

[Christophera]

You have been waiting for a long time and the answer is;

NO, the buildings did fall; but there was not total pulverization.

No, you can not answer the question because it did not happen, end of thread, end of question.

No ---- because there was not total pulverizaton.

Tell that to the families that have to live with their relaitves that were ground up being buried in a land fill.

 

[Oliver]

Your explanation for why the wrong tower fell first is about as bad as your explanation for why they both fell the wrong way. Actually you never did explain why WTC 2 fell the wrong way and never did explain why the body fo WTC 2 went east while the top went west.

...And you never explained why the wrong tower was
hit. Do you have any valid sources for your claim???

Basically you and your bsufucating group are trying to cover your evasion with repetitive questioning,

"bsufucating" WHAT???

Explain why the top of WTC 2 went west and the body went east. BTW, the concrete core is easily seen inside the perimeter columns just before connecting with WTC 3.

There is no conrete core. All i see is a big Bratwurst.
No kidding here...

 

[Oliver]

Tell that to the families that have to live with their relaitves that were ground up being buried in a land fill.

Well, why don´t you tell the families they should stop
forgetting their losses and explain your concrete core
to them. Let´s see how much teeth they left...

 

[firecoins]

Tell that to the families that have to live with their relaitves that were ground up being buried in a land fill.

at least their ground up family members lived. Most have to live without family members because they died in a plane crash, fire, a suicide to avoid a fire or a building collpase cause by a weakened steel core

 

[Thunder]

screw loose change

i watched "screw loose change" last night. it was very long...but it convinced me of what i have known for a long time. the 19 hijackers were most likely the ones who flew the planes. the wtc collapsed due to structural damage and weakened steel. the pentagon was hit by a plane....as was the field in PA. i dont know what convinced me most...maybe its the fact that no structural engineers believe the conspiracy thoery. maybe the whole b.s. about cell phone calls at 30,000 feet when even LC calls them "airphone calls". maybe its the mention of the fbi flyers with a crosshair on the wtc...to suggest a future attack on the wtc was planned.

its just all silly to me now. and intensally paranoid. CTists talk about the neo-cons and the media spreading fear to control the masses...well what do you call all the claims about a zionist/illuminati/freemason/pnac/cfr/cia/federal reserve plot for world domination? i personally feel the fear spread by alex jones is 100% worse then what bush does (the neo-cons and bush also spread b.s.).

most importantly....whether i agree with them or not...muslems do have a motive for attacking us. we have been messing with their nations and politics for so long..is it that hard to believe they would hit back? CTists seem to think that either radical muslems really dont hate us, dont even exist, or dont have the means to hijack an airplane (been done hundreds of times). the arabs invented algebra, i think they can take over a plane and pilot it into the three largest buildings in the usa.

 

[uruk]

Your explanation for why the wrong tower fell first is about as bad as your explanation for why they both fell the wrong way. Actually you never did explain why WTC 2 fell the wrong way and never did explain why the body fo WTC 2 went east while the top went west.

Basically you and your bsufucating group are trying to cover your evasion with repetitive questioning,

You've never provided evidence proving that there was a proper sequence or direction for the collapse of the buildings. Your making claims without any substantiation. Your just making things up as you go along.

 

[beachnut]

Tell that to the families that have to live with their relaitves that were ground up being buried in a land fill.

The already know it, you disrespectful concrete core liar.

You have been waiting for a long time and the answer is;

NO, the buildings did fall; but there was not total pulverization.

No, you can not answer the question because it did not happen, end of thread, end of question.

No ---- because there was not total pulverization.

 

[hcmom]

If you do not have a leg to stand on, what do you need socks for?

Every now and then, you gotta think, "Wow, he can make sense!"

 

[Christophera]

The already know it, you disrespectful concrete core liar.

You have been waiting for a long time and the answer is;

NO, the buildings did fall; but there was not total pulverization.

No, you can not answer the question because it did not happen, end of thread, end of question.

No ---- because there was not total pulverization.

Where were you when the firefighters were mystified because they could find no remains, when the largest piece of anything found which was recognizable to a firefighter was 1/2 of a phone key pad out of all 100's of the desks, chairs, file cabinets and computers in the towers?

Do you suppose that whole bodies were over looked by grief striken rescue personel? Do you suppose families stood by while intact remains were hauled off in trucks to be buried in land fills. Do you suppose they created a masive stink about their loved ones being buried in a dump because the hundreds of searchers just missed the bodies in all their searches?

Deny for as long as you can stand it.

All the evidence is against you on this one. I've posted the links that show it is common knowledge that the towers were pulverized and I've authored a page that explains it.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html

 

[Christophera]

i watched "screw loose change" last night.

You are new to this thread. You don't know that I believe some deeply manipulated Muslims did fly planes.

You have not provided a logical explanation for this, which IN NO WAY represents a collapse.

Plane hit the towers and there were fires but that had nothing to do with the towers coming down.

If you think they did then find one image of the steel core columns that were supposedly in the center of the towers, but first, try reading the last 190 pages and you will find that not one image of those core columns from the demolition at some elevation above ground has ever been posted.

That is because FEMA lied and the towers had a steel reinforced cast concrete core.

http://algoxy.com/conc/core.html

And it was built with high explosives centered and distributed throughout and encapsulated in concrerte to protect it for 33 years so detonators could be planted to initiate the demolition of 9-11

 

[delphi_ote]

Where were you when the firefighters were mystified because they could find no remains, when the largest piece of anything found which was recognizable to a firefighter was 1/2 of a phone key pad out of all 100's of the desks, chairs, file cabinets and computers in the towers?

Reality.