• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Wow... I am speechless

How can anyone be amazed when both Fox and OJ are involved? I'll be amazed when Fox refuses to show a program on moral grounds. It really makes you wonder how a company that defines moral depravity also manages to find a home for ultraconservative rightwing douche bags. As for OJ, I'm waiting with great anticipation for they day they have a "Where are they now?" show and pull up to the dumpster he's living in with his crack whore wife... who he just killed.
 
If he's innocent, he is desperate to clear his name.

If he's guilty, he's either the most moronic murderer or the most despicable one.


Well it's not like he can get charged again. And he probably wants the cash; he's getting several million for the book deal.
 
Oh, I didn't know that. Are you saying the case could never be reopened?


Nope, not as far as I know; from the murder angle anyways. He was aquitted of the crime, so he can never be charged again for the same crime.
 
Nope, not as far as I know; from the murder angle anyways. He was aquitted of the crime, so he can never be charged again for the same crime.
Unless he bribed Judge Ito or the jury... Hmmm the jury....
 
You know, I'm still pretty surprised he would bring this kind of attention to himself.

Maybe no "US court" justice in his future, but what about vigilante justice?
 
Pardalis said:
If new evidence is found could a case like this be reopened?
You can't be tried for murder twice. It doesn't matter if new evidence comes to light. The state gets one chance and has spent it. (As a general principle of justice, this is a good thing)

I find nothing in the news story to indicate that he is innocent or guilty.

If he's innocent, he is desperate to clear his name.
Probably.

If he's guilty, he's either the most moronic murderer or the most despicable one.
Or smart. Double bluff or whatever. As for despicable, a lot of people will think this. But objectively the murder itself is much more despicable than any TV show about it afterwards.

bob_kark said:
I'll be amazed when Fox refuses to show a program on moral grounds.
Likewise. In short, for me:

—Not really a huge surprise that OJ is doing this for a number of possible reasons
—Not a surprise that News Corporation is running a TV programme like this
—Not speechless at all. Rather routine really. It would inspire boredom for me to watch it, and not very much of that . . .
 
I must admit I never followed the trial, so I don't have an opinion on whether he did it or not.

I just find it odd that a guilty man would be doing such a thing. Why risk bringing this back to the public's attention?

:boggled:
Money and satisfaction. Money is obvious. The satisfaction is in "Ha,ha, you couldn't get me then you can't get me now, I murdered them this is how I did it , Bite Me!!!"

Hope he gets everything he deserves, real soon.
 
Money is obvious.

I agree, that is often the case.

The satisfaction is in "Ha,ha, you couldn't get me then you can't get me now, I murdered them this is how I did it , Bite Me!!!"

That's assuming alot though. The "double bluff" would make him an extremely despicable human being, like if the murder wasn't enough.
 
I am speechless.
Speechless? Hell, I'm not even mildly surprised.

Give it ten or so years and Jacko will be on Oprah with a couple of his vicitms, talking about childhood days of fun, sideshow rides, exotic animals and sodomy at Neverland Ranch
 
its pretty funny that the same people who call fox media "conservative, prude, censoring" ,etc... are jumping all over to act all conservative when they dare to say something out of the fold.

Remember this is the guys who brought you Married With Children, who left and right alike loved to scream curses upon
 
In the future, could you include a more descriptive title for your theads? "Wow... I am speechless. O.J. to speak about the murders" allows those of us with slow connections to easily determine if we want to open the thread.
 

Back
Top Bottom